Those noses were clearly eyes in an early iteration of the design.
>>32946117
I'd really like this pokemon more if it didn't have faces. It'd make it freakier somehow.
>>32946133
I know, right? I do remember an edit of Klink that had three holes instead of its eyes, though.
>>32946117
Is klink to magearna what farbunk is to diancie?
>>32946450
>farbunk
>>32946117
To be clear, all of its dots/eyes/noses/everything on its "faces" is supposed to be ambiguous. I'm pretty sure that's the gimmick of its design.