This is how models will look like on the Switch

File: IMG_2274.jpg (737KB, 1440x1920px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 1440x1920px

>>32886584
Nah, that doesn't look right. They will look like pic related

>>32886914
oh god yes please.

and fix the sizes of all pokemon please.

I want that it looks right when a massive giant wailord is next to clefable

>3ds
>they have nearly the same size
fucking kek 3ds shit

>>32886914
This looks awful

>>32889249
>and fix the sizes of all pokemon please
The sizes are already correct in that arcade game.

File: 5555858+_5a39ed7a8f67543b578835bed0d863d1.jpg (78KB, 832x584px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 832x584px

>>32889259

>>32886584
i dont know why but MMd models that arent vocaloids or at least actual 3d models from the pokemon games look weird.

File: pokemon_battle_revolution_009.jpg (54KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x480px

>>32886584
Guess again
Except GameFreak instead of Genius Sonority

>>32889289
because they're made by nerds in their basement instead of a professional team

>>32886914
Seems likely enough.

3DS hardware predates the implementation of competent hardware lighting effects on mobile/ARM based hardware while Tegra X1 stacks up to graphics card tech made between 2010 and 2014.

The lighting effects will probably be good enough so that they drop that attempt at cel-shading or they'll do it even better.

>>32889265
even better !
fuck, now I want this.

>>32889330
The 3ds is 240p

>>32889307
this looks too good in design
gamefreak always creates trash designs when it comes to 3d.

>XY
>ORAS
>SM
>retarded creepy giant eyes faces that only smile perm.

>>32889421
And runs on gamecube tier hardware

>>32889421
Resolution isn't really all that holds it back, anon. It's dated 3D hardware that can't push that many polygons out and it doesn't support as many lighting effects as GameCube or Wii does.

File: ace.png (129KB, 692x571px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 692x571px

Trainer models sure look very polygonal in contrast with the Pokemon ones. How much can the Switch handle anyway?

>>32889307
Was Battle Revolution really worth the shit it got?

>>32889498
It has the same power of 2 wii u

>>32889516
I don't care what other says, I love this game.
Is was competitive, it had great designs and graphics , the characters you could use are awesome and the soundtrack was s-tier too.

>>32889516
It was more of a tech demo for Wii that happened to have Pokemon battles in it. It isn't bad, it just could stand to be a whole lot better.

>>32889498
Far more than 3DS can handle, rest assured.

>>32889597
New 3ds

804 MHz ARM11 MPCore quad-core + extra weaker single-core (one reserved for OS)[

The switch

Octa-core (4×ARM Cortex-A57 & 4×ARM Cortex-A53) @ 1.020 GHz

>>32886584
are these models MMD like the anon above said?

>>32889618
ARM11 (2002) is pre-Cortex hardware. At best you could compare it to flip-phone hardware or so before the age of the iPad. Not that phones of that tech couldn't do 3D, but for reference the Cortex-A series started with A8 in 2005 just after the ARM11. PSVita a Cortex-A9 based system from 2007.

Switch uses A57 and A53 cores, both of which were the first 64-bit ARM line of CPUs (2012). Not the best on the market, but I would imagine it's like trying to pit a Pentium 3 against a Core2 Duo.

>>32889289
Given those models are pretty damn bad.

>>32889307
Dawn model rip when?
>>32889516
It was like a shitty Pokemon Stadium, you only buy it to see battles in 3D.

>>32889799
I don't know.

The Models Resource had its priority on the Pokemon of all things. No trainers whatsoever have been dumped there. Maybe elsewhere?

>>32889259
Show us what you would want them to look like then, tryhard

File: 1474383578299.png (502KB, 772x576px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 772x576px

>>32889259

>>32886584
Op, those models look horrifying jfc

>>32889498
>Trainer models sure look very polygonal in contrast with the Pokemon ones.
That's because the Pokemon ones are made for the purpose of being reused in future generations that will have higher resolution graphics, while the Trainer models aren't going to leave the game they were made for.

>>32889307
That's ugly af they should pull a digimon and hire an artist with a good design

>>32889709
>releasing literall 2002 hardware in 2011
How did nintendo get away with that?

>>32890291
It was a step up from the DS, that was the important part.

>>32890129
That wasn't made by GameFreak, they'd probably have a more sensible modeling practice in-house. Gen VI 1:1 models weren't bad.

>>32890291
t. Cocksucker

>>32890383
The only faggot here is you

File: 1485823592629.png (359KB, 1160x1080px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1160x1080px

>people still think gamefreak will fully utilize the switch hardware
>actually believing the switch graphics will be anything more than a marginal improvement from the 3DS

gamefreak has always let us down, why do people think the switch pokemon games will be so great this time?

>>32890514
Because they will be HD and will look great

>>32890053
Retards need to get over their crippling desire to not be able to criticize anything they can't do.

Imagine you are a no talent hack at everything (lol, as if anyone making this argument has to imagine this considering their demonstrable lack of brain power) and you showed up at a friends house. Your friend has a band and he plays you their new piece. Do you accept this nails on a chalkboard garbage as the best music ever because you can't make it?

No, you wouldn't, because it doesn't fucking matter. You can know something is shit without being able to make it yourself.

Need another example of why you're a retard? Over to you, Dave...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByglxFeQBOY

>>32890784
Only problem being that it really wasn't criticism at all, not to mention the guy is flat out wrong.

>>32889259
shhh anything that isn't what Game Freak's doing will instantly get praise even though they're pretty much doing exactly what they should for the general aesthetic but are held back by shitty hardware, shittier coding, and screen resolution

>>32890514
I think you're missing the point.

3DS has some okay looking titles, but ghost samurai armor tech demo or not, Pica200 was still pretty dated hardware. All they really need to be is Wii tier which punches WAY about the New 3DS' weight, Xenoblade on 3DS is proof of a gimped experience. The high poly models Creatures provided probably won't even have to be tweaked or optimized as the Tegra or the Switch's dev tools have plenty of safeguards the 3DS couldn't provide due to being unable to support certain development tools or middleware that's already in the Switch's wheelhouse.

Switch may not be a PS4 in terms of hardware, but it's in no way an HD 3DS either.

>>32889543
I'll agree on the music.

>>32890291
>>32890365
That the new 3ds I wrote which came out in 2015.

The 2011 3ds was Dual-Core ARM11 MPCore, single-core ARM9

Which is even worse

The fps drops playing sun and moon on old 3ds is nuts

>>32891873
Point still stands, ARM11 with more cores still is nowhere near a Cortex.

>>32890129
Are you talking about the character designs or models ??
Because Ken Sugimori sure is much much better than the Cyber Sleuth artist who barely can draw tits correctly.

File: Leaf17.jpg (30KB, 240x270px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 240x270px

>>32886584
>implying Leaf would get a model

>>32893233
Not even a Leaf fan, but it would be nice if she did or at least customization allowed you to be her in some form.

>>32886914
they should keep the cel shading style

File: Leaf16.jpg (299KB, 600x682px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 600x682px

>>32893244
We can dream