Hmmmmmm
>>32777583
Anyone can replace text on a picture from amazon :D
where's the link?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0721792SJ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_qDQqzbHVEQXJT
>Jan 1, 2030
>>32777583
>The page is real
What do they mean by this?And $70 for a game?
So they have listings for Yoshi and Kirby and they say "unconfirmed title" so is Stars the confirmed title?
>>32777643
Placeholder you retard
>>32777631
>£70
That would be about 90 dollars for you sir. Nah, the prices are just placeholders until the item is actually out
January 1st 2030. I would be 34 years old
This is the third time this thread's been made today
Can you fuck off already?
>>32777646
If it was a placeholder it would be called just Pokemon, like yoshi and kirby
>Starcucks can't recover
So, what does this shit mean?
Someone from amazon is a Starsfags?
>>32777583
Some amazon employee probably saw the stars rumors and made a placeholder. Even though USM are basically stars
>>32777583
>pokemon
>e
Also, who cares what the title is going to be? I doubt it's stars unless they're rehashing the same game a third time
Hypetrain
>>32777583
shitty edit, OP
>>32779782
>https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0721792SJ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_qDQqzbHVEQXJT
>edit
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>32777583
>>32777646
People who believe in this stars shit need to die.
1. There was absolutely no proof other than someone saying 'Pokemon Stars on the Switch' and all you idiots believed it for no reason at all. I can do that too, 'Pokemon Queef' on the Switch next year!' So I can expect all you retards to believe it?
2. Gamefreak already said that a core series game is coming, it's not fucking Stars, since when has Gamefreak made only 1 core title? Every core title game/Gen comes in pairs and has been for the last 21 years, they're not gonna stop it now.
3. THE SUN IS A FUCKING STAR - Why would the name a game after something that is already a game but under another name.
4. Why is it so hard to accept that it's not real? stop holing onto something that isn't happening, Stars isn't a codename, if the game isn't coming for over a year, hell maybe even 2 years, they've probably only just started on the concept stages and probably don't even have names yet.
5. Enough with this Stars bullshit, I can't believe how stupid people are and yes I am triggered cause I'm honestly sick of seeing it all the time.
>>32784192
I'll throw out that Blue(JP), Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, and Platinum were core titles that were not released in pairs. With that said, if we adjust it to games that introduce a generation, it becomes true.
>>32784192
Wasn't everything else from that leaker completely fucking wrong anyway? Like Mario being a launch title, BoTW being delayed a couple months after launch, Splatoon being a port and not a sequel, etc.
>>32784227
I think everything came from different sources, a huge mess really.
Not that it matters, the Switch game is still a way's off and I'd be almost impressed if they made 3 Alola games in a row.
>>32784227
Yes, he also thought MK would be an entire new one.
>>32777631
>.jpg
>>32782081
>PokemonStop
Was Go originally versioned?!
>>32784283
I didn't have the gif,thanks anon.
>>32782081
Why so many duplicates?
>>32784192
>since when has Gamefreak made only 1 core title?
Pokemon titles are always single versions when on home consoles, anon.
>>32784203
Yellow and Blue(jp) I'll give. But the rest are newgame+s with a $40 pricetag.
>>32784192
1. It actually came from multiple sources and reputable leakers.
2. They also made sequels instead of a third version, did zero third version, and now a third version that's split into two games. Are you really going to claim muh patterns as your defense? Nintendo literally admitted they enjoy doing the exact opposite of what people are expecting.
3. Stars was said to be the code name, like Rainbow was for Sun and Moon.
4. Yes, leakers said that was the code name. More than likely, development has already started. You do realize they are constantly making games right? They don't release a gen then start on the next one.
5. Wow you sound mature enough to be here.
>>32784227
Yes, but they did correct the BotW release date ahead of time. Sources don't get all information correct, and the leaker said to take it with a grain of salt as things change, get canceled, misinterpreted, etc. Not leakers fault people ran with it.
>>32784633
You'll give me the two that added the least, but not the ones actually worth getting? And regardless of if you consider them worthwhile or not, they are still core titles.