How can they worm their way out of this one?
>>32748936
>Chuggaaconroy
rewrites
>>32748936
oh shit, completely forgot about that
>>32748970
he's a good kid. a fine autist.
Wait what is it trying to say? I am confused
>>32748992
Rowan is talking to the three of them about evolution and then asks numerous questions, such as if Legendary Pokemon are already mature since they don't evolve.
But this generation introduced two Legendaries that can evolve.
>>32749018
Solgaleo and Lunala aren't Legendary Pokemon tho, they're Ultra Beasts
>>32748936
i hate chugga cause he reminds me of myself. that is to say visibly autistic
>>32749047
They're both.
>>32748936
Phione evolves into Manaphy and it's Gen 4.
Rowan just doesnt know. I mean, Sycamore doesnt know about Megas and Lucario Town exists in his own region
>>32749054
Ultra Beasts =/= Pokemon
>>32749057
let's not
>>32749047
Rotom says Cosmog, Cosmoem, Solgaleo and Lunala are Legendary when you register them in your dex.
>>32749067
Rotom is also an electrical jellybean who has an IQ of 115
>>32749072
Higher than the IQ of most on this board
>>32749055
Phione doesn't evolve, Manaphy is Mythical, and Phione's Mythical status is disputable.
>>32749072
Rotom gets all of its knowledge from a PokeDex invented by human scientists and researchers. Humans came up with the Legendary/Mythical classification to begin with. So humans can call them Legendary if they want.
>>32749055
>Phione evolves into manaphy
>And I've gotten reports that there are supposedly legendary Pokemon in Alola that are part of an evolutionary family
>>32748936
They could actually leave that bit of dialogue completely untouched and it would still work.
Instead of "The legendary Pokemon(the collective lot, all legendaries) that don't evolve)" it becomes "The legendary Pokemon that don't evolve(addressing specifically the legendary Pokemon that have no evolutionary lines, the majority but with the few exceptions we now have)"
Alternatively, it could be left mostly the same, but with an added line like "And what differentiates those legendary Pokemon that do evolve from those regular Pokemon that also evolve?"
>>32748936
Make it so he's specifically talking about Sinnoh's legends since none of them actually evolve. Seems easy enough.
>we could make tens of millions of dollars
>but we won't, because of a throwaway line of dialogue
Wait, there is a legendary pokemon that evolves?
>>32749277
Cosmog line
>>32749055
>>32748936
The question's fine. What DO they make of them that don't evolve? Some of them do. Even if it's just one line.
>>32749055
Mega evolution was supposed to be unknown outside of Kalos, too. Look what happened with that.
>>32749277
>>32749294
Type: Null too, technically.
>inb4 "B-but type null and Silvally aren't legendaries!"
Game code puts them into the same category as the Tapus, Legendary Birds, Regis, etc. When searching the GTS, if you choose to exclude legendaries and mythicals, Silvally and Type: Null are also excluded from search results.
>>32749091
Kek. Underrated