How would you feel if Necrozma fusing with both Solgaleo and

Just like bw2 seeing the original dragon

>>32747609
I do still believe that they're going for a dragon form necrozma. Why else would its concept art go to such lengths as to specifically identify each body part with its position in a dragon-esque creature if they weren't going to show it in-game?

>inb4 the original dragon is also implied and will never appear anyways

It's different. There's no concept art of anything remotely resembling the original dragon, or any notes indicating how kyurem and reshiram's bodyparts assemble to become one, just lore references and dex entries. If necrozma was equivalent to this (and for it NOT to have a dragon form), it would have to a) be an implied mon that never really appears and doesn't have a canon design or b) have no notes on its concept art and just a dex entry in the lines of "it is said it appeared after the crash of an ancient dragon whose its remains have never been found" or so.

so necrozma is just a helmet and gloves for other pokemon? interesting

>people still believe in this retarded theory

>>32747636
Plot Twist
>Necrozma is the original dragon