Why doesn't GameFreak do DLC?
>>32741959
Because they're idiots
They do. All third versions are just DLC for the price of a full game.
>>32741974
ding ding ding!
>>32741974
Why not both?
They could be optimizing their revenue tho
Release tons of small downloadable DLC
image a hundred 5$-15$ options
>>32741959
>Thinking GF has the capability to make DLC
>>32741974
>I don't know what DLC stands for
Because Masuda has some level of scruples
>>32741959
Event Pokemon are DLC
>>32742056
But those are free
I want them to CHARGE ME for fucking DLC
>>32741990
>wanting this
>>32742046
>I don't get sarcasm
>>32742059
>I want them to CHARGE ME for fucking DLC
Full games are easier to get 6 year olds to beg for for Christmas.
>wanting dlc
>in anything, not just Pokémon
the nickle-and-diming nature of the game industry today is holding it back and kills consumers. If gamefreak does one thing right, it's not charging for DLC or anything like that.
..Although Bank is basically the same thing.
>>32742069
triggered much?
like it or not, DLC is fun.
>>32742212
>DLC is fun
leave
>>32742302
>can't come up with a good counterargument
sounds like you just enjoy being contrarian and edgy
DLC makes good games better
>>32742059
>ITS JUST NOT THE SAME IF I DONT PAY FOR IT
>>32742059
>>32742212
>>32742318
>>32742322
>>32742326
>poorfags who can't afford five dollar DLC that enhances gaming experience
w e w
>>32741959
Even though GF are just as cashgrabby as the other companies, I appreciate the fact they have never released paid DLC. Releasing DLC might seem cool at first, but it just encourages developers to release half-assed games, so then they can charge us more and more to get the full-on game. Just look at Mario Kart and Pokken for Wii/Switch.
>>32742318
Honestly their versions were essentially DLC with a $40 price tag. It made good games better, but the fact that everything runs on money throws the idea integrity out the window. DLC just seems like a "pay if you wanna play the FULL game"
I would've bought ORAS battle frontier dlc if they made and released it tho.
>>32742348
What...
This is not truth
>>32742059
>I want to pay money for what I'm currently getting for free
America, everyone
I hate this country
>>32741959
Because, It's terrible.
>>32741959
Why sell $10 DLC that one third of the customers will buy when you can save the content and release a full game every year that 100% of the fanbase will buy.
>>32741959
Because they know they can resell the same fucking game for full price instead.
>>32742348
That's often true but not always. Mario Kart 8 had good DLC. Pokken was okay up until they decided not to bring the arcade stuff over. Switch ports are basically Game of the Year editions. Some of Nintendo's DLC has been bullshit (see Fire Emblem, especially with Echoes and THAT FUCKING PRICE), but MOST of it has been developed after the fact.
>>32741959
I wish they released extra male costumes as DLC.
Masuda or someone said they don't like to have DLC because the game is for children and they think its wrong to continue charging people for extra stuff.
Usually what ends up happening is shit that would probably be DLC in another game is saved and reworked into a new version a few years later.
I really wish they'd do something with the fucking amiibos though
>>32742056
Event Pokémon are already programmed into the game. The events to get them are DLC, but the Pokémon themselves are not.
>>32742318
That argument is invalid because you want to pay for it and say free content doesn't count.
>>32741959
>Normalizing DLC.
I'm glad they still bring out complete games, although it feels like SM was a beta test if they already announce USUM.