why do people want new pokemon?

File: 4749387589323425.jpg (64KB, 322x333px)

64KB, 322x333px

>>32738035
>Less content is good
You must be the same kind of person who defends the removal of the Battle Frontier.

>>32738054
If the games dindt had new pokemon, pokemon games woud sell over 20m+ rn

New pokemon damage the sales, BF doesn't

>>32738062
>New pokemon damage the sales

Trolling, or just an idiot?

>>32738095
It's true man.
More people will buy GEN 8 if there's no new pokemon
New pokemon ruin the fun of the game.

If they didn't introduce new Pokemon, people would realize that Pokemon is a stale and mediocre RPG series.

>>32738113
>More people will buy GEN 8 if there's no new pokemon

I repeat: Trolling, or just an idiot?

>>32738035
bruh, just play Pokemon Yellow

>>32738128
This faggot that captializes GEN every time is just baiting really hard right now, he's made multiple threads recently, just ignore and move on.

I wouldn't mine a game with no new mons added but a new region with lots of things to do.

I'd really like to be able to join the evil team or join like one of a few different teams that all see themselves as the heroes but the others as enemies.

>>32738128
The more Pokemon introduced in a gen the less it sells.
See gen 3 and 5 selling less than 2, 4, 6 and someday 7.

>>32738128
I legitimately don't understand how you think the guy saying "Pokemon games would do better without pokemon" might not be trolling

>>32738119
This is pretty much the reason FOR adding more Pokémon.