>tfw protean gren hasnt been banned in OU yet
>>32734035
I bet my metaphorical left ballsack it'll be suspected this month
>>32734041
London?
>>32734035
Even Jobber has a leg over it. What did ya expect?
>>32734044
I lost my boys in Afghanistan
>>32734056
London, Afghanistan. What's the difference anymore?
>>32734035
Are you being happy you can use the frog in OU, or are you being sad that it's not seen as strong enough to be Uber anymore?
>>32734035
>A POKEMON FAST AS FUCK
>CAN TURN INTO ANY TYPE
>HIGH SP ATK
>BROKEN EXCLUSIVE MOVES
not ban
>blaze Blaziken
ban
>>32734075
you cannot separate mons by their abilities otherwise tiering would be an absolute clusterfuck
although greninja is an exception to this rule
>>32734075
>high special attack
lol
>>32734143
Sand veil Garchomp is banned
Rouhg skin Garchomp is not
Speed boost Blaziken is banned
Blaze Blaziken is banned too
???
>>32734143
>although greninja is an exception to this rule
How? Because it's not.
>>32734205
Regular Greninja and Ash Greninja are tiered differently like Mega Evolutions, they have seperate usage stats and a seperate tiering as a result. Just because Protean Greninja gets suspected doesn't mean Ash Gren will too
>>32734035
>Removing a Landorus-T check
B R A V O
>>32734243
Anon, do you not understand how Mega Evolution tiers work? Imagine. If Garchomp is banned to Ubers. But only Garchomp. Mega Garchomp isn't seen as that big of a threat. Can you, in this situation, use Mega Garchomp in OU? No, anon. You can't. Because to get Mega Garchomp, you have to use Garchomp in OU, as without Garchomp in a OU battle, you can't Mega Evolve it into Mega Garchomp.
See? Similarly, if Greninja is banned to Ubers, you can't use Greninja in OU. If you can't use Greninja, you KO with a Greninja and get a AshNinja. So if Greninja is banned, AshNInja is too. Now, the only way around it is to ban Protean Greninja only, but that's the Blaze Blaziken situation again. It requires complex ban, as you're only banning a single set of Greninja, something Smogon is against.
>>32734197
>Sand veil Garchomp is banned
No it isn't. Also banning abilities is different than banning a singular ability on one pokemon
>>32734292
It's almost like you don't smogon anon. In the case of the Greniggers they are literally different pokemon. Not to mention Ash-Greninja can't breed because It inherited Ash's asexual gene
>>32734327
It's still the same Pokemon anon. It's still a Greninja. It's a special Greninja, sure, but that doesn't make it not Greninja. It's got literally everything a normal Greninja would have, minus the ability to breed.
>>32734607
They are treated as two different creatures in the tiering system
>>32734197
sand veil garchomp is not banned