http://www.strawpoll.me/13146497
It's time to know the truth.
Would be more effective had you made several options asking for age, not just underage/not
>>32726941
Retard
Anon, youre getting nowhere
Underages wont just say "yeah im 15 and fap to fictional animals"
>>32726962
why? there's no consequences
Underage is also different between countries. Canadians aren't underage in Canada when they're 16, for example.
>>32726962
they're not going to say here, but they honestly have no reason to lie on the strawpoll, nobody knows who is who
>>32726975
You idiot it's clearly referring to the site's 18+ rule
Personally I'm not underage but I don't quite get the +18 rule on this board. /vp/ is already a completely SFW board to a franchise aimed towards CHILDREN. It sounds ridiculous to me that the Nintendo's target audience can't post here, on probably the biggest concentration of Pokemon fans in the Internet.
As the poll shows, there are already underages among us posting, keeping it quiet in fear of getting banned. Not to mention the potential boost in site traffic if the restriction was removed.
>>32727115
It's still 4chan. Legally the site can't give teens free reign to post, even Facebook has age restrictions.
>>32727115
>Not to mention the potential boost in site traffic if the restriction was removed.
why are you saying that like it's a good thing?
>>32727126
Yes, but Facebook is 13+.
Is it really impossible to remove an age restriction on specific boards?
>>32727135
Because more traffic = more money from ads = better financial situation of the website.
Remember when Hiroshimoot said the website doesn't make enough money to sustain itself?
>>32727115
>Personally I'm not underage but
Underage spotted
>>32727115
>even a pokemon based on playboy bunnies and a pokemon that literally includes the words "reverse harem" in its dex entry aren't sexualized.
>>>/global/rules/2
You have to go back.
>>32727770
>>32727770
Enjoy your one year ban.
>>32727075
>18+ on a blue board
>>32726941
Being underage has no meaning when you consider that moot created 4chan when he was 15
>>32727770
Pretty sure every single underage that voted is at least above 13, otherwise we'd see a lot of "lol xDDDDDD" on this board.
>>32727770
>>32727792
Hello underage
>>32727115
>/vp/ is already a completely SFW board
People post porn and other gross fetish shit related to Pokemon here almost everyday.
>>32727770
bye
I'm guessing >>32727770 got banned because he "Lol yES I'm underage up top XD"?
>>32726941
I feel the underage are gonna say they're not.
The ones saying yes are probably of age and trolling you, OP.
Did you honestly expect accurate results?
>>32728096
>mods not doing their job
>>32728862
So you're saying the results are the opposite of what it really is?
The truth revealed :^)
>>32728884
I never said directly opposite.
Just potentially horribly inaccurate.
You assume people were honest with those answers? I know I wasn't at least.
>>32728096
As they do on Facebook, but in both instances it is forbidden and quickly removed
>>32726941
>/vp/
>for underage
There's a reason why /sug/ was moved to /trash/. There's a reason why MLP was given it's own board. That reason isn't just because it's popular and clogging up the threads, it's because people keep putting shit in those boards like foot fetishes, vore, and stuff that isn't SFW.
>>32728096
>almost
>>32729961
>quickly
>>32728900
Underage detected
>>32726973
>being this new