>children's game defend this

>>32726312
>Kids have mommies
>Mommy-type pokemon

I fail to see the problem here.

dont question the furbait

>>32726326
>furbait
>has no fur

It's scalie you absolute brain-dead mongoloid.

>>32726326
Listen to >>32726336 you fucking idiot cunt piece of shit

is this the most sexualized pokemon

>>32726336
>>32726344
>furrries taking it personally when compared to "scalies"
Who cares you stupid dogfuckers, they're animals and you want to have sex with them. Furries.

File: 2edbddf204dafabf8a188596de5d73c8.png (292KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 800x1000px

>>32726350
Hah, no, that honor would go to heliolisk

>>32726352
>w-who cares if i'm retarded, your opinion doesn't matter
Stay mad cunt, I don't even fap to Pokémon

File: 1490643828535.jpg (348KB, 1000x960px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1000x960px

>>32726352
Not really, since I could actually be considered a partial scalie, so whatever.

>>32726364
>n-no u!
furries btfo

>>32726352

Pokémon are not animals.

>>32726350
>sexualized

I don't think you know that word means.

>>32727614
if this isn't it, then what IS the most sexualized pokemon?

File: airballoon.png (3KB, 80x80px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 80x80px

>>32726312

>>32727615

There are no sexualize Pokémon.

>>32727653
I don't you know the definition of sexualized if you think even a pokemon based on playboy bunnies and a pokemon that literally includes the words "reverse harem" in its dex entry aren't sexualized.

>>32726312
well id probably go with Quagire and mandibuzz cover its weaknesses pretty well

>>32727610

>fictional beings that are based on animals, look like animals and act mostly like animals aren't animals because I want to fuck them

File: sexualize.png (64KB, 471x525px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 471x525px

>>32727666

I think, You're confuse.

>>32727676

They are consider a different species from animals.

>>32727687
You're telling me the concept of playboy bunnies and reverse harems aren't inherently sexual, and that attributing them to pokemon doesn't count as sexualizing?

>>32727676
when was the last time animals shot ice beams, thunderbolts and spit fire at will?

>>32727693

>different species from animals

Do you even know what an animal is? Any living being that isn't a plant, fungi or protist is an animal.

>>32727693
You're talking out of your ass. Bulbasaur is often questioned whether it's a plant or an animal Pokemon, so fuck you some Pokemon (Camerupt) are animals and some (ice cream) are retarded horse fuck. Or a plant if it's an Oddish or something.

>>32727706

>fictional animals with elemental powers aren't animals

I guess any human able to use magical powers in fiction isn't a human either? Idiot.

>>32727666
>even a pokemon based on playboy bunnies and a pokemon that literally includes the words "reverse harem" in its dex entry aren't sexualized
[citation needed]

>>32727737
The OP and lopunny, just go check any pokemon site ever.

File: Not sexualized-1.jpg (76KB, 651x699px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 651x699px

>>32727700

Nothing in Pokémon is sexualized.

>>32727716
According to the Pokédex.
Pokémon and Animals are not the same thing. You're a complete idiot, if you thought Pokémon were animals.

>>32727718

Pokémon are not animals. According to the Pokédex.
They are consider a different species than animals.

Is that you, Richard?

>>32727776
by your own definition, it is.

>>32727776

>unless it has visible tits it's not sexualized

Are you 12?

File: rVNTR3R_d.jpg (242KB, 436x2498px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 436x2498px

>>32727803

Yes.

>>32726312
It's a salamander.

>>32727812
No. There are no Sexualized Pokémon.

>>32727831

There are no sexualize Pokémon in the Pokémon Universe.

>>32727834

It's a Salazzle. Salazzle likenesses is based off a salamander but It's not a salamander. a salamander is animal.

>>32727844
you posted an image with the definition of "sexualized", and by that definition, with the cases I mentioned, there ARE sexualized pokemon.

>>32726312
who in the hell ever said officially that pokemon is a children's game?

oh wait fucking NO ONE.

>>32727871

>autist triggered by the fact his precious franchise is indeed targeted at children and not manchildren like himself

This thread was a mistake

File: 1496991976331.jpg (5KB, 196x110px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 196x110px

>>32727871
This, pokemon is a porn franchise now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17bj4_bglYI

>>32727866
sexualizing = making sexual.

It's not sexual at all.

>>32727910
again, how is a reverse harem and a playboy bunny not sexual?

>>32726312
With its overly feminine design and dex entries revolving arond reverse harems and pheromone control, you might argue gamefreak really just wanted a lizardbait pokemon and there's nothing deeper about it, and you wouldn't necessarily be wrong; they might just be trying to appeal to furries and scallies for all I know.

However, I think salazzle's true reason to exist is that they wanted for Plumeria's ace to be analogous to her role and thus they came up with a lizard big sis (plumeria) that controls tiny little thug lizards (skull grunts). Salazzle even has similar pink marks reminescent of some of Plumeria's clothes. Also, do note that literally no grunts during story mode use salazzle at all, this is a mon only Plumeria uses within team skull.

The same way, I think Gardevoir, which for most is the "original waifubait", was just made inspired by a guardian angel, as it was to become Wally's ace in RSE, and he being a sickly child, gamefreak might have felt a guardian mon would be appropiated.

I honestly think most of the time gamefreak designers are just incredibly, extremely innocent and oblivious to what weird things the fans will feel about these mons. On the other hand, there are times where it is incredibly difficult for me to believe that they don't know what they're doing, like when they make mons like Lopunny or Tsareena, for example. Each designer might have different goals or demographics, who knows.

>>32726312
We play to it, so yes, they're kid's game.

>>32726312
> No Tits
> No Vag

>>32727925

Because, there are no sexualized Pokémon.

This is a undeniable fact. It can't be debated at all.

>>32727964
shield yourself in fallacies if it makes you feel better I suppose

>>32727931

Fanon.

>>32727968

I repeat myself again. There are no sexualize Pokémon.

File: 1429769375518.jpg (42KB, 618x518px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 618x518px

>>32727871

>>32727984
A "reverse harem" is inherently sexual.

>>32727732
How the fuck can you even call that an analogy.
The humans you are talking about are still humans, the specie exist in real life.
But an Arcanine or a pikachu don't exist in real life they are fictionnal beings.

Pokemons are to animals what elves,dwarfs and orcs are to humans.

grouping humans with other humans to justify grouping animals and fictionnal monsters show your intellectual dishonesty or your lack of brain power in either case, you shouldn't participate in any kind of argument.

Furfags and scalefags

I must leave before I contract autism

>>32726312
children's media has been getting seductive animal characters for dozens of years now, this is not a deviation from the norm

>>32728342
Not the same Anon.
Pokemons (or most of), elves, humans, dwarfs and orcs are all animals.
They born, they eat organic matter for creating their own matter, they breath, they (theoretically can) reproduce, and they die. All these things show they're animals.

>>32728252

No Pokémon are sexualized.
Why do you keep denying facts?

>>32728429

According to in-game canon information.
Pokémon are not animals, idiot.

Still waiting for a proper argumentation.

>>32726352
>Who cares you stupid dogfuckers
Don't be disgusting. It is lizardfuckers.

File: IMG_1713.jpg (40KB, 800x447px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 800x447px

>>32726312
>>32728422
>>32728495
Seriously. How do people only notice this in games?
>>32727716
>any living being that isn't a plant, fungi or protist is an animal
In the real world, sure.
Plenty of Pokémon are said to be as sentient and smarter than humans or even to be reincarnated humans and there are animals in the Pokémon universe. So no, they're no animals. Wanting to fuck, say, Gardevoir (Picking it because waifubait and could consent in canon) isn't furry, it's whatever wanting to fuck aliens is.

>>32728459
What is not sexual about a "reverse harem" ?

Children like bad games, and Pokemon Sun/Moon is a bad game.

>>32728629
For fuck sake stop asking him that you retard, he's taking the piss and you're actually starting to make me agree with the moron.
A harem isn't sexual because it doesn't make sexual, attribute sex or a sex role to anything unless you include "wives" or "mate" in terms of animals. In the latter case, that's biological not sexual so fuck right off.

>>32727971
That's not what fanon means. That's called design. You can say "Gamefreak don't think that much about their design" but that's just as much speculation to say they do

>>32728670

I said no Pokémon is sexualize.
which is a undeniable fact.

>>32728761
Either you're samefagging yourself of you're a fucking retard, that's literally what I said.

>>32726352
Lizards are animals?

>>32728783

well, you better know.

>>32730666

Yes.

>>32730666
Yes they are, damn Satan get it the fuck together

>>32727831
>I get a hard on after watching a slightly curvy salamander cartoon
I get the feeling you are the horny prepubescent.

>>32728603
how do I fuck this thing?

>>32730806
buy his pots of joy

>>32730816
>his
nevermind

>>32727893
>implying Japanese suzue likes Pokemon any more than western Stacy

File: 1496798751010.png (33KB, 130x108px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 130x108px

>this thread

is /vp/ more autistic than /r9k/

>>32731415
fuck no

quality thread

>>32731415
/vp/ is

>20% underage
>55% /r9k/, furfags, scalies and other assorted degeneracy
>15% 20 somethings with too much spare time
>5% shitposters
>5% normal people who like the game

and 100% autistic

>>32731509
>5% normal people who like the game
if pokemon hasn't turned you into a furry, you don't really like the games

File: 1494975602214.jpg (33KB, 402x416px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 402x416px

>people complain /vp/ is dead
>it gets active
>people realize how terrible it really is
>they leave
>the cycles continues

genuine question

gen 5/6 forward really has a lot of anthropomorphic pokemon, the OP being a great example

do you think they know about the furry audience and are catering?

or are they so desperate for ideas that they dip into furry OCs

>>32731566
they have known since gen 3, gen 4 at latest

>>32727776
imma need that sexualized pic uncensored....for research purposes....

>>32731415

/vp/ is to /v/ what /mlp/ is to /co/.

>>32731535
This pretty much tbqh.

File: lopunny01.png (88KB, 500x458px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x458px

>>32726312
Children don't realize it's sexualized.
Adult players realize and enjoy it because they are sexualized.

May I also ask: Wouldn't the existence of curvy sexy moms to their kids be just as offensive? People are different.

>>32727776
sexualized sauce?

>>32731538
I started getting into /vp/ last spring and i remember it being like this. Once SM comes out, I wait for 3 weeks or so because I didn't get the game for a while. Once I finished it, I came back to /vp/ I found it was dead and there wasn't anything too interesting about it accept for things like drawthread. I still surf 4chan but out of compulsiveness for about 3 months and then think "wonder whats happening on /vp/ now?" check to see a new direct is out. I've dropped my other vidyas and have gotten back into pokemon again.

People like me are the ones shitting up the board. I'm sorry that people find /vp/ only interesting if it has shitposting and that only happens during pokemon hype times

File: hot phox.png (1MB, 1748x2480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1748x2480px

>>32731719
>>32731924
http://68.media.tumblr.com/96e03e4a83f919b1436ae5de89b9d1e0/tumblr_ok5gxi59JG1tdpo1ko1_500.jpg

found it

>>32731924
just look up Salazzle on e621 fampai

File: youkiddin'meboyo.jpg (7KB, 250x185px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x185px

>>32726336
>calls above anon a mongoloid for calling Salazzle furbait
>proceeds to say that she belongs "to scalies"

Hey, bud. Just wanted to let you know that amphibians don't have scales.
Fucking retard.

>I want to fuck this animal but I dont want to be a furry
>I'll just call it sexualized and blame GF

classic

File: 420340981.jpg (113KB, 886x886px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 886x886px

>>32727892

File: 1487983542830.png (6KB, 283x285px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 283x285px

>>32731945

>those legs

File: 4e962acc680ace7298c6c6f9899fd010.png (375KB, 1726x1756px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1726x1756px

>>32731990
yeah, it would be better with humanized legs imo but whatever

>>32731535
new banner right here

File: tumblr_oqyotxSBHw1uh3x51o6_540.gif (1MB, 540x370px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 540x370px

Who else has a shiny lizard queen?

>>32726312
I can't. Gen VII was designed my degenerates. It's a sex game.

>>32727931
this desu

>>32732272
not me ;_; i want a white queen.

>>32731566
salazzle and tsareena confirmed that Game Freak looks at the Rule 34 and learned how to turn our boners into cold, hard cash

>>32732362
Get a cute charm Sylveon boy, climb the volcano, find your shiny lizard lady. Don't let anything stop you.

>>32726312
Only zoophiles see this lizard lewd.