Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: confused-nigga.jpg (14KB, 431x431px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 431x431px
Ok, riddle me this:
>The fact that Landorus-T can run multiple movesets AND items to check it's problem matchups proves its versatility and gives you more reason to run it
Ok, fair enough.
>The fact that Meta Metagross can run multiple movesets and can possibly answer counters/checks means it's too strong and unhealthy for the game
Why's this argument a thing? I understand anything else against Megagross but why the fuck do they use this to justify something being good and something being overpower at the same time? Is it really fine that Meta Megagross can run X to get rid of its problem matchups is considered "problematic" but Landorus-T with Flynizium Z Fly can blow away Tangrowth being OK?
Enlighten me, I'm lost.
>>
Lando has a 4x weakness and can only supersonic skystrike once. Megameta can do the murderfuckery multiple times.
>>
>>32708421
So? He can run Focus Sash and blow back most "Ice Beamers" like Greninja and Magearna.
>>
File: 1496811111249.jpg (8KB, 250x250px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 250x250px
>>32708421
>le 4x weakness
>>
>>32708411
smogon doesn't make sense at all. They just ban whatever they feel like and then claim that anyone who disagrees just "isn't good enough" to understand.
I will never for the life of me understand why anyone gives that website any credit.
>>
Mega Metagross is in a godly speed tier with the same attack as Lando-T, and with its great movepool it leaves it with little to no checks. It also has the capability to sweep once it gets an attack boost from Meteor Mash.
And yes, Lando is great, but it's not broken and as retarded as it sounds, it keeps OU "balanced" by cheking lots of mons
>>
>>32708520
do you even play any of the Smogon meta's?
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2