It's not mandatory to buy a Pokemon.
It's call of duty or Fifa. Every year comes out new features, new players. You pick it up any time you want.
But the amount of shit posters is nuts on here. They feel an entitlement for kids games.
Maybe gamefreak isn't getting worse but your getting older
>>32705577
Because they're manchildren who only play Pokemon. They've never moved on from Babby's first JRPG.
>>32705577
Can't handle a different opinion? wrong place kid.
>>32705631
I would gladly accept it. If there was actually information of the new Pokemon. Instead of shitting on it without any purpose.
It's a different opinion. It's pure ignorance
As someone who didn't like SM, I'm actually quite surprised at the mixed response this announcement got. And it's not just here, I see it on other sites as well with people complaining for various reasons.
I was expecting a positive response considering, well, this is Pokemon. Guess it's good that SM already set my expectations low, I'm mildly interested in USUM at most.
>>32705577
Because it looks like a lazy cashgrab.
>release game
>release game+ next year, that will be $40, kid