Favorite Starters

>>32664603
Absolute garbage taste besides Sceptile.

>>32664612
you can only sling shit if you post your own, cuck

File: Best_taste.png (357KB, 1364x1016px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1364x1016px

Here's mine

>>32664603
Meh.
Typhlosion, Meganium and Blaziken are way too high.

>>32664622
Don't feel like wasting my time on making the chart. Also
>furries pls go
>has Blaziken in 4th place

>>32664603
All the starters are shit. I choose a random one and box it whenever i reach the pokemon center.

File: 1496552881732.png (357KB, 1364x1016px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1364x1016px

>>32664629
Yours is pretty close. I could party with you.

File: 01.png (289KB, 1364x1016px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1364x1016px

Here is the only good taste in the entire thread

File: ratethestarters.png (579KB, 1138x626px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 1138x626px

This took way too long. I'll try to explain my choices.
Every mon selected here was based solely on the pictured form; for example, I love cyndaquil but hate typhlosion, so it's low despite my love for the first stage, and I hate chimchar but love infernape, so it's placed high. Megas are ignored too, which leaves venusaur so low. For the last column, blaziken is what I consider to be the diving line between good/decent starters and bad starters. Chesnaught avoids the bottom three by virtue of being a glyptodon, albeit an awful one. Samurott is a tremendous mess that fails spectacularly in every area and I'm baffled that it has any fanbase at all, though it is the best in game starter in BW, so maybe the kids who started with it are posting here now. You know it's bad when the creator even said it was a product of writer's block. I know serperior isn't exactly popular, but I think snakes are cool and I think the theme is fun. Blastoise is so high because of nostalgia, which I freely admit. I think that covers everything.

>>32664603
>blastoise at 9th
you seriously believe that down syndrome crocodile is better?

File: gatrtime.png (359KB, 480x281px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 480x281px

>>32664841
pretend swampert's in the default, whoops
>>32664891
I like gatr, too. Blastoise is good, but crocodiles > turtles, so gatr wins by default

>>32664603
Hello Op, I think you have a good taste, but your rating by Region and Type don't make sense.

Gen 3 is rated as your best by region, but when you rate by type, your "average" ranks are better for Gen 1.

>Gen 3
Sceptile 1
Blaziken 2
Swampert 4

>Gen 1
Charizard 1
Blastoise 2
Venusaur 3

Juding by these numbers, how they add up, your taste is so inconsistent that it changed while you were making the chart.

I would kindly ask you to reconsider your listings.

File: blastoise.png (552KB, 662x700px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 662x700px

Actually believing there's a starter better than this pussy soaking bastard right here means you have shit taste

>>32664918
post your autismchart, blastoise anon, I want to see how you rank the rest

File: Blastoise-1.png (184KB, 723x768px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 723x768px

>>32664940
heres my chart
/thread

File: check it.png (302KB, 1364x1016px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1364x1016px

>>32664603

>>32664629
7/10 Your fire placement is all kinds of fucked up.

>>32664662
8/10 Primafag and Chestnot way to high.

>>32664706
3/10 Blaziken and Empoleon are placed well at least.

File: 1490600741655.gif (1MB, 540x280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 540x280px

>>32664639
two legs =/= furry

talk shit about Blaziken IRL and see what happens

>>32664905
Charizard is first, but Blastoise is 6th and Venusaur is 11th while Sceptile is 2nd and Blaziken is 4th, what don't you understand?

Or look at it this way
>Charizard > Sceptile > Blaziken > Blastoise >>>>> Venusaur > Swampert

All three Hoenn starters are great when I feel Charizard outshines the other two Kanto starters. Get it? Although I guess all 6 are great, but fuck you.

>>32664603
Is it always the same guy starting this threads? horrible taste, by the way

>>32665498
I haven't started a thread in years besides this, so no.

But kill yourself, furfag.

>>32665501
Alright, foot faggot

disclaimer:
Primarina and Delphox being anywhere but the last 2 slots invalidates your opinion.

>>32664603
>furries pls go
>charizard, sceptile, and feraligatr in top 3
Scalies are still furries, anon

>>32664603
Are you 12 years old?

>>32665564
the difference is that lizards/reptiles aren't traditionally sexualized like foxes and dogs and stuff by animalfuckers

if you're going on to say that I'm a furry for liking Charizard then pretty much liking anything makes you a furry, no?

and besides, I usually draw the line of distinction on whether or not you want to fuck X thing

File: 1470543412059.jpg (61KB, 678x678px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 678x678px

>>32665566
Why? Because I don't like the fox in a dress? Or the seal with pig tails?

File: 07b8ef75c2728537809f6ef5efb9590a.png (111KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 300x300px

>>32664603
>>32664841
>>32665516
Anyone fucking mind posting template?
Incompetent OP

>>32665571
>Incompetent OP
rearrange the pics, you retarded fuckface, you want a blank template and have to google 50 pics and resize them all to fit in that box?

File: 1477812560735.png (364KB, 1148x626px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1148x626px

not OP, I always save al templates when I see them.

>>32665575
>Rearrange
All those pictures are shit quality, and I like using sprites.
A good OP posts the template so people can make their own shit.

>you want a blank template and have to google 50 pics and resize them all to fit in that box?
Yes, fuck you, pig

File: 1478353194560.png (604KB, 1148x626px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1148x626px

I'll share mine again since we are all bored right now.

File: image.png (248KB, 976x1104px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 976x1104px

>>32665479
Literally a furfaggot in denial. But don't worry, I'm doing the opposite instead

>>32665479
>IRL
talk about a man trapped in a fursuit

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2149x3035px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2149x3035px

>>32665842

>>32665931
Hot

>>32665934
Blaziken is a cute and pure wife!

>>32665963
Now post bara Gatr stuff

File: image.png (1MB, 1280x914px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x914px

>>32665978
kay

File: image.jpg (143KB, 540x1200px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 540x1200px

Something pure

File: 1495906574245.jpg (583KB, 1379x1116px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1379x1116px

>>32665990
T-that's a bit TOO bara
>>32666003
This is cute

File: BTFO.png (810KB, 1024x724px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 1024x724px

>>32665657
>>32665990
>>32665997
>>32666003
Fucken baras, can't wait to oneshit you with my Hidden Power Water and Leaf Blade Decidueye

File: image.png (631KB, 825x1157px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 825x1157px

>>32666016
Decidueye a slut! A SLUT!

File: image.jpg (312KB, 1000x1600px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1000x1600px

>>32665943
Other version

>>32664603
>god tier
Hoenn starters
Kanto starters

>high tier
Alola starters
Sinnoh starters

>mid tier
Kalos starters

>low tier
Unova starters

>shit tier
Johto starters

File: Wotter3.jpg (227KB, 777x1029px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 777x1029px

>>32664841
>I'm baffled that it has any fanbase at all
Because its an interesting take of a samurai-influenced design? Its pretty cool if you visualize it as an underwater knight or something. And can you at least acknowledge that using your leg armor as a sword scabbard is a bit clever for a samurai themed-animal?
>You know it's bad when the creator even said it was a product of writer's block
Yet for some reason, the execution is immensely original. Only shat on by babies who wanted a fursuit otter.

>>32664662
>>32664953
lmao typhlosion fags are so fucking delusional

>>32664841
>You know it's bad when the creator even said it was a product of writer's block.
Source? Genuinely curious.

>>32666144
interesting and or original =/= good, and it was dead on arrival as a quadrupedal swordsman. The leg scabbards aren't cool because they look tacked on and don't make sense. Same with the tail.
I don't like the rest of the line, either, if that makes you feel better.
>Its pretty cool if you visualize
The fact that you have to put it in pretend scenarios to make it look good says it all.
I'm not saying you can't like it, I'm just saying it's vehemently hated for good reasons.

>>32664603
God tier
Gen 1 and 4 starters

Good tier
Gen 3 starters

Meh tier
Gen 2

Bad
Gen 5,6 and 7

Shit
Ash-greninja

>>32666499
Sorry, I can't find the interview. He basically said he didn't know what to dew with dewott, so he ended up at the zoo and decided to make it a sea lion.

File: Pokemon+and+digimon_02b65b_3416036[1].jpg (173KB, 775x1153px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 775x1153px

I am consoled at the thought that as bad as some Pokémon designs are, they will never be worse than the Digimon designs.

File: 1496572004572[1].png (603KB, 1148x626px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1148x626px

I based it on a combination of factors. I always thought that Swampert was ugly, but I like the first stage enough to tolerate it. Primarina does not get the same gesture, because it looks too feminine.
I think that mine follows the general pattern of what people like. But whenever I see somebody hating the Johto starters, I am at a loss for words.
>>32666438
At least you hate the other fire starters.
But I fail to understand why anybody could hate Typhlosion.
There are so many different factors that go into how much people like starter Pokémon... But I think that these are the correct answers. Compare.

mega meganium when?

>>32666438
t. meganiumfag

>>32667380
i like it how you removed "oh shit motherfucker"

File: goku and Vegeta head bob.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>32665516
I just wanna bring attention to the fact that this guys favourite is decidueye, but incineroar is decently high up too. Way to be not another black and white starter war fag. you can like both, and not be a cunt while you're at it

File: Peeved Saur.jpg (7KB, 291x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 291x204px

>>32664953
Your taste is all over the place.
Places speedy special attacking grass reptile sceptile in top tier, Places speedy special attacking grass reptile serperior in shit tier. Places slow bulky grass torterra in top tier, Places slow bulky grass chesnaught in shit tier. I could do this more but you get it. You can like one and dislike the other, but to put 2 pokemon that are very similar in exact opposite ranks seems really weird to me.

>>32668821
>Typhlosion at the top
this by itself should tell you a lot

File: Excellent taste my brother.png (80KB, 589x264px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 589x264px

>>32664662
mine and yours are different, but I think you have the most reasonable and respectable chart in the thread

>>32668821
>gameplay is the only reason to like a Pokémon
You just might have genuine autism.

File: 1496175993321.jpg (92KB, 1024x348px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1024x348px

>>32666733
>liking bara gator and bara fish

File: Starter Tier.png (414KB, 1148x626px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1148x626px

>>32664603
>>32664629
>>32664841
>>32664953
>>32665516
>>32665657
>>32666144
>>32666733
>>32667380
>>32668743
You gays are so based
>>32666121
except you, you have good taste

>>32670836
>all this contrarian taste
>Hoenn starters last
Absolutely based

in terms of how i feel about the starters overall, 6>4>5>7>2>3>1.