no new game this year

explain

>>32655840
I think what OP is implying is that Nintendo isn't going to have people play competitive Pokemon online without paying some type of fee, which could mean they're waiting until a Pokemon game actually releases next year so that the paid online services coincide with one another.

Good. That means /vp/ stays comfy. Fuck, I miss 2016.

>>32655886
If anything Pokemon is one of the games. You don't have to pay for. Online is for most games not all.

I guess smash bros this holidays.

Pokemon is for kids

Nintendo said certain games are exempt from paid online,
Pokemon will probably one of them since GF said they wanna keep it free

>>32655915
>Pokemon is for kids

all Nintendo games are for kids, and its entire fanbases is kids, even if they're 30 years old

>>32655944
Smash bros Wii u and zelda was E10+

>>32655886
is it gonna be on 3DS you fucking retard

>>32656002
NO STOP I NEED TO JUSTIFY MYSELF BUYING A CONSOLE ON LAUNCH REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1469402260533.gif (3MB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x320px

>>32656002
>is it gonna be on 3DS you fucking retard
>thinks there will be a 3DS pokemon game will be out next year
Nice proof you got there. Can't wait till E3 and no new Pokemon game is announced.

If anything they'd want it out this year to get people hooked on the online, then want to pay to keep playing that way.

>>32656420
Yeah because we are all SO hooked up to play SuMo online today 3rd of June 2017 half an year after its release, right?

>>32655891
Why the hell would you miss 2016? 2016 was when we had that horrible Pokémon GO flood with so many newfags. I never want to endure that again.

>>32655988
Are you retarded? Sun and moon has more adult content than this games, the Esrb are full of morons.