Would a Pokemon/Digimon crossover game work?
>>32633049
No, fuck off
No.
>>32633049
no digimons rep would be dragged down
>>32633275
what rep? kek
there are too many digimon to choose from and no real fan favorites aside from a handful. not to mention people generally only have 1-2 digimon instead of possibly hundreds of pokemon. that and there are a lot more digimon that surpass godhood than there are pokemon, balancing would be a mess and it would probably have to devolve into something similar to pokken, rumble, orsnap
>>32633049
Only the nonhuman shaped ones.
>>32633049
I think the best way to do so its a card game. As in, an in universe cardgame(like the pokemon tcg video game). So you're allowed to excuse the differences in power and lore between the two. And tcg are important parts of both franchises.
Either that or tweak digimon's rules. Digimon is used to that anyways.
>>32633584
Most of the main ones have at least one humanoid stage.
>>32633049
No, Renamon.
>>32633049
>what are mega evolutions
>>32633275
Kind of hard to get dragged down from its perch of 'completely dead in the West'.
>>32633714
Which is why we have gotten 2 games in the last 2 years with a third early next year right?
>>32633049
No. Most Digimon designs are too inappropriate or edgy for a kids game and the RPG elements in Digimon are too convoluted for Pokemon's simple yet deep system.
Also, what game would it be? Puzzle? Fighting? Platformer? Racing?
>>32633614
something that has nothing to do with digimon.
Based Digichads living in Pokémonetty's head RENT FREE
>>32633803
No. Most Final Fantasy designs are too inappropriate or edgy for a kid's game, and the RPG elements in Final Fantasy are too convoluted for Disney's simple design philosophy.
Also, what game would it be? Puzzle? Fighting? Platformer? Racing?
>>32633714
>completely dead in the West'.
I hope it stays that way. The western Digimon fanbase is cancerous as fuck.
>>32634000
t. /vp/