ITT

[insert interesting obscure animal here]

>>32580647
What am I looking at here?

>>32580657
Wobbegong.

>>32580657
What satan said >>32580666
Is a kind of flat shark

>>32580647
Isn't stunfisk kind of like that?

File: Flounder_camo_md.jpg (393KB, 1531x1021px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 1531x1021px

>>32580894
Nope.

>Sharpedo

Thats a stonefish

>>32580647
Literally Relicanth

>ITT: people who don't know what the glorious wobbegong is

>>32582196
>tfw too intelligent

>why is [insanely obscure fish] not a Pokemon yet

Yes because the one thing that Pokemon definitely needs more of is fish.

>>32582267
There are almost four times as many known species of fish as there are mammals, and there are much more pokemon based on mammals.

File: mooseusfwryanhagerty.jpg (387KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 800x533px

This still isn't a pokemon, so don't trip over some random fish

>>32582325
what is stantler

>>32582267
The wobbegong isn't obscure though? I've known about it since I was very young.

>>32582333
A reindeer not a moose?

>>32582333
Not a moose.

There are two types of deer in Pokemon: Bambi-esque in the grass/normal type which seems based on dainty white tailed deer and the derpy Stantler that seems based on large barely tailed elk.

And Xerneas is a god deer.

File: basking_shark_1.jpg (43KB, 640x395px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x395px

But all fish look the same, right?

File: Platymeris_biguttatus.jpg (1MB, 2073x1660px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2073x1660px

Let's get some non-fish up in here.

>>32582196
What is a Wobbebong, never seen that in England

File: stone.jpg (235KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1920x1080px

>>32582449
Yes, like this ordinary stone.

>>32582381
>a god deer
>not a deer god
One job anon. One job.

>>32581983
Relicanth is based on a coelacanth.

>>32582475
A flat shark from Australia that hunts by lying flat on the seabed and then opening its giant mouth really fast.

File: image.png (257KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 500x500px

>>32582337

File: 7LkZTwG_d.jpg (113KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x426px

Now look at this bug, that I just found...

>>32582643
They should probably make a name pun and make the Wobbebong a literal bong with a paper shark inside

File: whythefuckisntthisapokemon.jpg (114KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 800x534px

every thread until we get one

>>32582832
This one needs to have forms like Gastrodon, one grass type green iguana and one water type marine iguana

File: thebestfakemon.png (317KB, 1024x467px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1024x467px

>>32582884
fuck yes

File: bombardierbeetle.gif (2MB, 413x231px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 413x231px

Bombardier beetles literally shoot boiling liquid out of their ass.

File: Porcupine Ray.jpg (76KB, 526x343px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 526x343px

Fish thread?
Surprised we don't have a stingray yet.

File: images (1).jpg (6KB, 280x160px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 280x160px

I cannot fucking fathom any remote fucking possibility that this mind-blowingly amazing shit isn't a fucking Pokemon yet.

Gamefreak must be run by fucking baboons if they don't think that this is best shit that could ever possibly be a Pokemon.

I can't express my utter awe at the ineptitude at whoever designs anything other than a Pokemon based on this shit. Holy fuck.

>>32582475
>>32582801
t. Brit-tard who can neither read nor spell

File: 46be305270e17b88f0791971c2d24ba8.jpg (35KB, 453x640px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 453x640px

>>32584066

File: ed6bffb7d1895c18f042f569906824f0.jpg (195KB, 919x960px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 919x960px

>>32582738
neat

>>32584098
subnautica lookin ass

File: fesh.png (946KB, 1193x701px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1193x701px

>>32580647
we've gotten 6 variations of moth/butterfly and no flying fish!!! REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

File: Wolf Eel.jpg (111KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 640x800px

Done.

>>32582889
The little green one evolves in either of those other ones depending on the location, right? But why is there one without a map/location?

>>32584301
That's the creator debating on whether or not to use one design or the other, as indicated by the question marks. I guess he just couldn't decide which one.

>>32584091
Bug/Dragon pseudo when.

>>32582363
lol benis

>>32582508
>God tier deer

>>32582769
>Groudon

>>32584051
>Be Britfag
>See Wobbegong
>Call it Wobbebong as a joke and because I am British
>Retard thinks that I am some kind of special needs retarded kid and doesn't recognise it was a joke
wtf

>>32584115
This should have been the Hawaii region's regional "bird".

>>32584200
>>32584206

A guppy with local or cross regional variants like this would be amazing.

WHERE'S MY MERMAID POKEMON REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>32587469
Primarina.

>>32584135
Ooooooh, it's cute!

>>32584118
>What are Finneon and Lumineon
>What is Mantine
>What is the wind-sock design that is Gyarados, a water/flying type since Gen I

I agree that a true flying-fish inspired fish Pokémon would be cool, but I can see how the designers would think we already filled that niche.

>>32587634
Finneon and Lumineon are freshwater butterflyfish being interpreted literally. Their butterfly-wings aren't used for flying at all. They're just decorative and help them send out their light signals. Fuck, Lumineon is more closely connected to deep sea than the surface with how bioluminescence is the attribute that GF put the most emphasis on aside from visually being a fish that resembles a butterfly. No flying elements at all.
Gyarados is a fucking sea dragon, and its Flying type is one of the least justifiable typings in pokémon history. Literally no connection to flying fish unless you think that every Water/Flying mon would be a Gyarados rip-off.

Mantyke and Mantine are the only ones remotely close in terms of behavior, since they actually are known for hovering just above the surface. They look nothing like flying fish though.