THERE NEEDS TO BE A POKEMON BASED ON EVERY ANIMAL

>>32554267
>animal is named dik-dik
>50% female
Explain this shit

>>32554336
It's a trap.

>>32554344
>traps
>female

>>32554267
>still no mammal or other synapsid fossil pokemon
>still no amphibian fossil pokemon
>still no fish fossil pokemon unless you count relicanth
>still no terrestrial arthropod fossil pokemon
>still no fossil plant pokemon, with lileep being based on an animal
>still no cenozoic fossil pokemon

We've had mesozoic reptiles for 3 gens straight at this point. It's ridiculous. At least Mamoswine, Raikou and Chesnaught cover pleistocene mammals.

>>32554516
>still no terrestrial arthropod fossil pokemon
Yanmega?

>>32554267
>We have a Pokemon based off of a movie character
>No Pokemon is 100% based on Hachiko
>Western Cartoons have referenced this dog mord times than on of the biggest franchises in Japan

>>32554267
And platypuss

>>32554380
>what are reverse traps

>>32554267
>Still no dolphin Pokemon.
No, Kyogre doesn't count. That's like considering Groudon to be a mole Pokemon.
Kyogre is a Leviathan, Groudon is a Behemoth, any similarities to other real creatures is mostly just coincidence.

>>32554787
Psyduck and Golduck are basically just platypuss mixed with kappa.

>Every pokemon has to be based on a single specific animal
End your worthless lives in the most painful way you can think of, please.