Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: 1493349871818.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1280x720px
Anyone else think this was a little too lewd for children? I mean, you can clearly see their cute pink armpits. how did this ever get passed green lit?
>>
>>32483324
Because most normal people outside of basement dwellers don't get turned on by toddlers.
>>
>>32483324
Because it wasn't lewd. You've just trained yourself to look for lewd and interpret anything as lewd if it can remotely be construed as such.
>>
File: 11326598_958429087535142_1446987290_n.jpg (88KB, 640x640px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 640x640px
You're the one looking at them in a weird sexual way.
>>
>>32483324
Because toddler armpits turn on about .5% of the population. If you give a fuck about such a small group, you can't greenlight anything because someone somewhere is turned on by everything.
>>
They are too old to be sexualized
>>
File: 1492697676848.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 640x360px
>>
>>32483324
They're just miniature Lanas, I don't care for them.
Give me mom porn. Lots of mom porn. Foot fetish art would also be nice. None of that soles-pressed-to-the-camera crap though.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3