It's never coming...
Good I'd rather get Fire Emblem than this shittier reskin without MARRIAGE
>>32327064
it's a crossover game anon unless it's really popular it's no gonna get a sequel
Do you want to feel bad? the last pokemon ranger was released seven years ago
I really liked the game, even though there were definitely a lot of issues. If there were to be a sequel, there'd need to be a lot of revamping. If you're actually interested in Pokemon Conquest, read this review, I think it outlines the major issues.
https://www.gamefaqs com/ds/654723-pokemon-conquest/reviews/151024
>>32327134
>Initial release date: 6 March 2010
DELET
>>32327105
>marriage is a good thing
Holy fuck, kill yourself.
I don't care if it's bait or not, just kill yourself, you flaming faggot
>>32327105
Please tell this is bait
>>32327064
>>32327789
:'(
>>32327064
I think Pokemon conquest sold better than another nobunaga's game
>>32327064
this makes me sad
Nope, just like how Pokémon Snap 2, a third Orre game and/or a Pokémon Stadium 3 that looks more like 2, 1 and Japanese 1 are never happening too.
>>32329625
I just want more kid's corner/pokepark style minigames. The exploration was good too.
>>32329686
I would concur, but the platformer is now almost the sole property of Mario, and anything else I would want to have done to it would be far too extensive. (have it be more like an action RPG and you can play as any pokemon that's available)
>>32327789
>mfw they could have do this with Pokebank instead of just showing boxes
>>32330190
Then they wouldn't be able to have nearly as much capacity, and it makes updating the list far easier.
>>32327789
Holy FUCK I have a shiny fug and a darkrai in there I forgot all about this shit