Lel

>>32306729
Bring uluB to the last frame with the hen.

File: tapu koko.jpg (9KB, 172x206px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 172x206px

>>32306729
100% accurate

File: 1488571345857.jpg (126KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 640x640px

>>32306729

File: 1491684742551.gif (341KB, 213x199px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 213x199px

>>32306729
>rooster
>female

File: 1472686171611.png (69KB, 356x265px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 356x265px

>>32308265
>based on a rooster
>that means it's literally a rooster

>>32308265
It's some weird legless floating humanoid with a shell shaped like a roosters head.
It's not a literal rooster.

File: 1482785023159.png (777KB, 956x785px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 956x785px

>>32308266
>based on rooster
>wouldn't be male like a rooster
your mental gymnastics are impeccable

>>32308287
that's why blaziken is male only, right?
and why primarina is female only too, right?

>>32308287
>male mawile exist
>female machamp exist

File: 1491100636902.png (148KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 222x293px

>>32308298
blaziken is primarily male, yes
and we aren't talking about seals, we're talking about roosters
>>32308304
>more mental gymnastics
might as well start assigning genders to steel types, eh?

>>32308310
I didn't say primary, I said only
if it only counts as primarly then why are you sperging over female tapu kokos?

>>32308310
>blaziken is primarily male, yes
Primarily != 100%

File: not-an-argument.jpg (59KB, 415x859px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 415x859px

>>32308287

File: 1490752262626.png (422KB, 341x589px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 341x589px

>>32308318
>female tapu kokos
because there's only one, not multiple you dumbfuck
your mental gymnastics are mindblowing
I should be asking you why you're so insistent on a fucking fictional animal being female you furfag

Are there actually people who think Tapu Koko is female?

>>32308349
never underestimate the power of autism

>>32308349
Are there actually people who think Tapu Koko has gender?
FTFY

>>32308349
female koko started as a meme but then it became popular with japs. Now koko has more female porn than male porn.

>>32308342
>he thinks there's only one
You probably think there's only one mewtwo and mew too, good to know I'm arguing with an actual retard.

File: 1485219954192.jpg (53KB, 478x515px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 478x515px

>>32308358
and why should I believe there's more than one?
the burden of proof is on you anon

>>32308369
the games have canonized the multiverse multiple times, ignorant dummy. But I guess you'll default to "hurr durr not an argument", because you seem to ignore any argument you can't comprehend and post another ebin reaction face.

>>32308382
>>32308358
>KFC harem
Sounds gud

>>32308382
Wouldn't multiverse versions be identical? And therefore also have no sexual dimorphism?

>>32308415
>Wouldn't multiverse versions be identical?
you don't even understand what the multiverse is, do you?

>>32308425
>implying multiverse has to mean cartoon multiverse where everything is the same apart from one wildly different aspect like everyone is genderflipped

>>32308415
Did you not get the Cosmog in the post game?
In one universe nebby evolved into Lunala, and in the other into Solgaleo.
And the cosmog evolutions are based on gender.

>>32308434
considering how the theory goes, yeah, there's bound to be some that are as simple as that. Remember those little simple differences are what the games themselves consider canon, as we can see from ORAS where they say that the evil team is dependent on the universe or something like that.

>>32308443
That's a creature with the power to cross between universes. It makes sense that it could reproduce sexually. Tapu Koko can't, and therefore has to reproduce asexually or not at all.

>>32308487
that has nothing to do with the point trying to be made. The amount of goalpost moving so far has been ridiculous, we went from your logic being baseless to this trite. Just accept you're wrong already.

File: 250px-416Vespiquen.png (56KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 250x250px

>>32308266
Wut?

File: gardevoir-mega.jpg (22KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x300px

>>32308508
wow, look at that obviously feminine design! how could this NOT be female only!
We can all nitpick, but the general rule is that just because it is based on something doesn't mean it has to be exactly like it, see >>32308298
>>32308304
>>32308322

>>32308493
Okay, maybe I lost track of the point being made. I just figured that anything that there was only one of in a given universe couldn't really have a gender. Might have gotten too far up my own arse

>>32308357
Really?

>>32308520
then let's put it this way: koko didn't manifest from thin air, something made it. The only pokemon that is arguably self-made is arceus. So if koko had to be made, then there's a plethora of variations of how it was made, there's male kokos, female, genderless, and some alolas where it doesn't even exist. That's all based on the game interpretations of this and game information too.

>>32308532
>What is gemmation?

>>32308544
something that doesn't happen to koko

>>32308553
Maybe :^)

>>32308298
game starter gender rates aren't canon since they're used to make breeding harder

>>32309141
They are canon, stop being an autist.

>>32309156
no can do senpai

>>32309159
listen, even if they aren't canon it doesn't fucking mater, gender ARE canon, and blaziken can still be female and it's based on a rooster, primarina can be male and it's based on selkies, mawile can be male and it's based on a female yokai, the list goes on and on. The point is that just because its based on something it doesn't mean it has to follow it 100% when making a pokemon out of the concept.