We're getting another rushed shitty game next year.

>>32276434
As long as it's at least as good as XY/ORAS/SM, and not as bad as DP/PT/HGSS, I'm fine with it.

File: image.jpg (82KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x480px

>>32276434
>we're never getting an expanded game with lots of fun content again

>>32276438
why does everyone suddenly hate gen 4? I've been on /vp/ for a few years now and all this gen 4 hate just sprang up out of nowhere.

>>32276438
I can not lie, this is finely crafted bait. A masterwork if I've ever seen any.

Just stop playing then.

>>32276434
>And people will buy it.
Just think from the perspective of GameFreak. The games sell no matter what. So why even try making it good again?

>>32276438
>implying HG/SS are bad
Nice bait, made me reply.

>>32276453
It's a futile attempt to stop Sinnoh Confirmed. It's not going to happen.

File: (you)zma.png (556KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 800x1280px

>>32276438

>>32276453
Sinnohfetuses are being cancer calling everything a confirmation for their remake. Same with gen 3 years ago.

File: download.jpg (3KB, 150x145px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 150x145px

>We're never gonna get content like Platnium, HG/SS, BW2

>>32276434
*this year.

>>32276434
Name literally one Pokemon game that wasn't shitty and rushed.

>>32276560
Emerald, Platnium, HG/SS, BW2...or hell everything pre gen 6

>>32276585
>Emerald, Platnium, HG/SS, BW2
These are the best games in the series.
But to be fair, GF already had almost all the resources done for those games in a previous game. So they could focus on making the stuff that made the games good.

>>32276453
Its literally because Gen4 remakes and or SM/Kanto are most likely the next games to be made. People are making remake threads almost daily and that does piss people off. When Gen3 remakes were approaching it experienced the exact same thing. Can you imagine what would happen when Gen5 reaches it turn for new games/remakes?

>>32276560
>P-Pokemon was never good
Fuck off /v/

>>32276438
Bait

>>32276691
How intelligent of you