Abilities that are good but have drawbacks

>>32213098
1.1 sounds good enough, crits are janks anyways, most people don't rely on them so it's still essentially a free 10% damage boost

>>32213131
Crits are needed to balance the metagame. Many 1850+ ELO OU competitive players rely on critical hits to get them out of stall battles.

Depending on the Pokemon it could them a better sweeper. But being able to crit kill things is a big deal, it changes a bunch of 2HKOs into 1HKOs on almost every offensive Pokemon, which is arguably better then more consistent power. It'd be a neat ability with either number, but I doubt the trade off would be worth it in the long run, at least at 1.1. I'm way to lazy to confirm that with a damage calculator however.

>>32213098
This only would work on Pokemon with already high attack/spa stat.

Too low and it's not worth it. Crits are necessary

>>32213152
I guess I'm ignorant then
Still, a 20% boost is huge, you'd have to balance the pokemon around that ability, not just give it to anything

Sounds like a worse sheer force ability.

>>32213190
Not really. You still get secondary effects.