Ugly thread

>>32201875
beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so no pokemon is objectively ugly, since nobody can say what constitutes objective beauty and thus determine what the lack of it would look like.

File: 1418308350-29692_max.jpg (250KB, 1261x720px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1261x720px

The ugliest.

>>32201885
Most people find it ugly though.

>>32201887
Waifusnek did nothing wrong

>>32201888
>most people
Contrary to what some autists believe, vp is a vocal minority of the fanbase

>>32201888
Most people =/= all people
Objective facts are universal, so the point still stands

File: image.jpg (27KB, 285x215px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 285x215px

>in b4 barafags rush to defend this

>>32201898
Every normies that I've talked to liked Decidueye more than the other 2

>>32201927
Just because they like one doesn't mean they think the other one is ugly

>>32201927
And every casual/normie player I know either picked Litten or Popplio. You can't make assumptions about an entire fanbase based off a few people you know.

I am a hardcore Primarina fan and even I must admit it is one of the worst designs the franchise has ever seen. Just what the heck was GameFreak thinking!?

File: Tumblrina.gif (105KB, 489x488px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 489x488px

>>32201875
Shitmon

>>32202196
agreed

>>32201927
Most normies I know went with the cute seal or the cool archer.

Whatever remaining Littenfags there were where I live have since shifted over to the other two when Incineroar was revealed. Except one guy.

Trannyseal is ridiculously overdesigned.

File: IMG_0110.jpg (54KB, 326x343px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 326x343px

>>32203712
>poster count didn't go up

File: tumblr_olhxutsQeb1w65hcwo5_1280.png (104KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 600x375px

>>32203712
Begone

File: numale maymay so funny kek xstarterfags btfo.png (977KB, 1280x1146px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 1280x1146px

There. Now that we have all three out of the way can we get back to topic?

>>32203789
what topic
there is no topic, this whole thread is a piece of shit made by and for bitter and angry grown-ass men to piss off other grown-ass men dumb enough to take to heart the ""beauty"" of a fictitious magical monster.

File: 1490839444082.png (238KB, 1708x1472px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1708x1472px

>this thread

File: image.jpg (33KB, 329x404px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 329x404px

>>32203789
No

More starter wars pls

File: 250px-154Meganium.png (42KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 250x250px

Not that it's THAT ugly per say, but it is bland as fuck.

File: 1466588711186.jpg (72KB, 531x471px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 531x471px

>>32203772
>He says while posting a tumblr filename

>Mfw this proves that trannysealfags are all smelly tumblrinas

This is /vp/, not tumblr. Go back to your shithole.

>>32202196
This is my favorite image of Primarina. It looks super cute

File: Disgusting.png (60KB, 179x217px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 179x217px

>>32203836
>He says this while posting a mobile phone filename

>Mwf this proves that shitposters are all phoneposters

Look, I can make stupid generalizations too!

>>32203840
Agreed, super good model for an already amazing design. I love that thing

>>32202196
well said man

>>32201875
I'm going to FUCK the tranny seal

>>32204510
God dammit I told you, WAIT YOUR TURN
Back of the queue, m8

>it's a trannyfags try to make owlfriends look bad by falseflagging episode

>>32201888
No, all normal people find Primarina pretty.
Just /vp/ is blind

>>32204534
>no one shitting on Primarina even mentions being an owlfag
What is it with starterfags and their victim complexes?

>>32201909
It's pretty good except for the wacky hands

>it's another one of those threads where one anon replies to himself 15 times

>>32204587
It's a dank meme at this point my man, don't take them seriously.

>>32204631
acting like a retard doesnt change the facts

>>32204628
Fuck off, falseflaggers are a serious problem and you know it. Stop trying to make light of falseflaggers to make it seem less like a problem.

>>32204534
>>32204638
This. Owlbros did nothing wrong yet we're constantly targeted by jealous trannyfags and barafags. It's not fucking fair

>>32204638
if you make light of them they become less of a problem. The only reason they're still around is people like you being triggered so easily. Grow a thicker skin and learn to live with what you like without needing validation or feeling attacked when someone else doesn't like it.

File: yinyangbigbang.png (213KB, 580x430px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 580x430px

Look at this ugly act of debauchery!
UGLY!

File: 476.png (167KB, 431x431px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 431x431px

I guess I'll be the one posting an actually ugly thing in this thread.

>>32204665
>actually ugly
see >>32201885

>>32204662
How repulsive! Finally a contribution to the thread that is actually ugly, now post more so we can keep feeling the ugliness.

>>32204674
Fuck off with that bullshit. Humans have standards, and anything that doesn't meet those is considered ugly. If YOU don't find it ugly, you're the weird one out, the one with unusual preferences. Simply put, the one with shit taste. Not that you're the only sane one.

>>32204674
>Being a contrarian
Kill yourself. Just fucking die.

>>32204696
Humans have different standards.

>>32204705
Yeah, no shit. And I'm telling you that your standards are low and your taste is shit if you don't find Probopass ugly.

>>32204696
if I don't find it ugly then it isn't objectively ugly. You can consider it ugly, you can say most people think it's ugly, but saying it is actually ugly is an objectively wrong fact by virtue of the definition of that word. Sorry it's too hard to understand. I don't like that thing, or most steel types for that matter. Do I have shit taste? I don't know, maybe, but it doesn't change the fact that the beauty or ugliness of pokemon I like or dislike isn't objective.

>>32204703
>telling somebody to die because they don't want others to incorrectly use a word and devalue its meaning
how sad

have we reached the point where people are falseflagging as falseflaggers? how deep can the meta go?

>>32201887
Samurott is a bit weird but they're all at least average-good. I don't know why Gen 5 gets so much shit when Gen 7 is way worse.

>>32204719
No one is talking about objectivity.
And your definition of what is objectivity is completely off. What you think doesn't matter. You can think Pokemon is actually pronounced "dick". Doesn't mean shit. You can think Pokemon doesn't exist. Doesn't mean shit. You can think that the sun is made of Ice Cream. Doesn't mean shit. You think say life isn't a thing. Doesn't mean shit. Even if you don't find it ugly, it doesn't mean shit. Learn what objectivity means before trying to sound like an autist.

YOU FALSFLAGGING BARAABRATRANNYTUMBLRNEETEDGELORDPOOPOOHEADGRENIGGERDRAGONTURTLETOADDINOSAURBADGERALIGATORCHICKENGECKOMUDSKIPPERFISHTHINGTORTOISEMONKEYPENGUINSNAKEPIGOTTERFROGFOXCHESTNUTHEDGEHOG FAGS ARE MAKING REAL OWLBROS LOOK BAD

Objective quality is a lie because everything is inherently meaningless until we bestow subjective value onto them

>>32201875
>Primarina
>Ugly
Pick one.

>>32204765
What the fuck is wrong with you? Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.

>>32201875
What do you think Primarinas throat feels like?

>>32204760
You're the one who doesn't understand what objectivity is. Something is objective when it is one way and only one way regardless of what anybody thinks. Math is objective, because regardless of how much you think 2 + 2 is 5, it will always be 4, but beauty isn't objective because it can be attributed to a myriad of factors different people can grade differently and be right, so it can have multiple right interpretations.

And if you say "time to post something actually ugly" you're implying it's obviously ugly, which it isn't because people can find it endearing or appealing, next time use the proper vocabulary if that wasn't your intention.

>>32204801
also this >>32204767
it's quite sad you're too dumb to understand how qualitative faculties aren't objective 90% of the time and have to retort to insults, buzzwords and backpedaling to argue in your favor

File: Sawsbuck.gif (58KB, 53x100px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 53x100px

this ugly sunuvabitch
i want my deerling back

Why do I feel that the people here are the same ones that browse the drawthread

File: Arceus.png (52KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 250x250px

>>32204680
UGLY!

>>32204719
Objectivity in art is just a different word for consensus. It doesn't matter if you think the doddle you made as a kid is as good as something from Picasso. That is, as far as everyone but you is concerned, objectively wrong. Same words being used differently isn't a new thing. Unless the ones who find Probopass to be not ugly make up a considerable number, it doesn't matter.

File: 1488382183620.png (9KB, 454x288px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 454x288px

>>32204873
>Objectivity in art is just a different word for consensus
Is it now? I'd like to see some kind of proof of that, because it doesn't sound true. If it is I concede you're right and say that probopass is objectively ugly.

>>32204637
leeee my obinion es fagt eben doe no phroof ad all
> Xdddxdxddd ::::DDDDD

File: 1490814352681.jpg (141KB, 1027x709px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1027x709px

>>32204858
disgusting!

>>32204656
>Implying he's not a falseflagger desperately trying to give meaning to his life

>>32204851
Shit taste

>>32204939
I'm not sure what sort of proof to present. All I can do is just explain my perspective on it. Art is a human thing. It means nothing, objectively. It means nothing to the universe. Humans decide what is art, and what is good or bad art. When the consensus that something is good reaches a certain point, that is treated as good in art. At a time, making realistic paintings was considering good. The realistic it was, the better. Then came surreal art. I would image a lot of people dismissed it at first, but when enough people liked that to have a noticeably effect on the consensus, it was considered good.

Other than what the consensus decide, there is no objective "good" or "bad". Nothing is objectively good. It is objectively true that the majority of people think being alive is good, but that's it. You can't say being alive is an objectively good thing. The entire concept of good and bad is a human thing, and I just assumed objectivity, when it came to that, just meant what humans decide. The same word, used differently.

>>32202196
this man is right

>>32205005
I see, I understand and mostly agree with what you say. I admit I was wrong in my assertion about how no pokemon is ugly or pretty, thank you for opening my mind a bit anon.

>>32205012
>replying to your own post
any retard can html edit, your fake screengrab can't fool me

>>32205023
Kek Probopassfags FUCKING TOLD

Now kys you jewloving faggot

>>32202196
true

>>32205038
>Poster count didn't increase

>>32205023
I mean, I'm not saying you were wrong in saying that no Pokemon is objectively ugly or pretty. That is true. I'm just saying I, and I assume a lot of others, treat the word "objective" a bit differently when it comes to art.

>>32202196
Fucking this.

>>32205065
>Poster count still doesn't increase

>>32205049
>That is true
Don't know anon, now I'm on the other side of the argument because of what you said, we can apply the idea of objectivity in arts to that of beauty, as a consensus, and given pokemon designs are essentially art pieces it fits quite well.

Primarina is beautiful.

>>32205096
It's ugly as fuck

>>32202196
Absolutely this.

>>32205126
It's beautiful as fuck.

>>32205096
Absolutely this.

File: b8.png (23KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x275px

>>32201875
>>32201881
>>32202196
>>32203712

File: trees.png (49KB, 260x200px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 260x200px

I'm just surprised that the thread hasn't been deleted yet.

>>32205137
That moment when the "b8" is actually correct

>>32202196
>>32203525 >>32203840 >>32203951 >>32205012 >>32205038 >>32205065 >>32205085 >>32205126 >>32205137
Fuck off sealfags stop trying to make us owlbros look bad with your falseflagging

File: 389.png (43KB, 536x493px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 536x493px

>inb4 turtlefags try to defend their ugly bara starter

File: worried.png (65KB, 209x209px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 209x209px

>>32205148
Same desu
I don't get it

>>32205154
Stupid falseflagger making real penguinbros look bad

>>32205148
>>32205161
I've noticed mods deleting falseflag threads related to the owl but not the other two starters.

The mods have an agenda.

File: vapeoreon.png (274KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1024x768px

Fuck the smogon fags, use your bros!

File: IMG_1408.jpg (39KB, 602x757px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 602x757px

>Mfw typlosion is the greatest starter of all time, and no one can say otherwise.

>>32205151
dobody gibs a shidd aboud owlbaggs
de datural edeby ob sealbaggs is barabaggs
liderally doobodye gibs a shidd aboud u, stob wid your bigdim gongblex :DDDDDDD

>>32205164
No, you are the falseflagging monkeyfag/turtlefag. Empoleon is perfect and that's a fact.

>>32205177
Primarina falseflagging threads get deleted usually, at least the obvious ones like this.

>>32205187
Why would sealfags hate barafags? They're both degenerate furshit lovers so I expect them to get along quite well.

File: 1487577531368.png (55KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1000x1000px

I don't even know what the fuck is going on anymore

>>32205183
Falseflagging Aligatorfag making us Weaselbros look bad!

>>32205221
*ratfags

Typhlosion is a rat. Get it right.

>>32205218
Falseflagging abragfag making us real owlfags look bad!!!

>>32205220
Fuck off Mewfag. You are clearly a falseflagger trying to make us Mewtwobros look bad.

>>32205151
Owlfags make themselves look bad. You're a pretty good example of this.

File: lol.png (88KB, 287x363px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 287x363px

Until the thread does die; post images you don't normally get a chance to use.

>>32202112
kys falsefag.

File: 1469500600917.png (667KB, 1075x856px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 1075x856px

>>32205229
mew(2)fags are friends, not enemies

>>32205242
pic actually related

File: Haha Benis.gif (603KB, 786x749px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 786x749px

>>32205242

>>32202112
I agree, fellow sealfucker!

File: 1482676364458.jpg (39KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 375x375px

>this thread

File: Drowzee (1).png (227KB, 536x422px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 536x422px

>>32205242
.

>>32205263
Sauce?

File: fucks roulette.gif (167KB, 270x223px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 270x223px

>>32205242

File: 1487722515328.png (607KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1000x1000px

>>32205242
pic related is banette getting out of this thread

File: 61902627_p0_master1200.jpg (408KB, 890x1200px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 890x1200px

>>32205242

>>32205276
Can't find it, sorry. It's not porn, if that's why you want it.

File: 1486332822007.jpg (681KB, 805x1142px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 805x1142px

>>32205242

File: 1482388699734.png (52KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 250x250px

>>32205242

File: Drowzee (2).png (182KB, 472x324px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 472x324px

>>32205242

File: 1470567426707.png (170KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1024x640px

>>32205242

File: 3E7B8FC1-02BD-4DA7-A95A-AC51D85D2DFE-763-000000D7771D6D28_tmp.jpg (110KB, 800x360px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x360px

>>32205242

File: IMG_0100.gif (114KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 512x512px

>>32202196
Yeah! Take that ugly seal!

File: 1470917978613.png (199KB, 1484x526px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1484x526px

>>32205242

File: 1477768585012.gif (3MB, 469x264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 469x264px

>>32205242

File: 1489761984126.png (438KB, 900x819px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 900x819px

>mods still didn't delete this thread

>>32205442
Mods have good taste. They know full well about the shittiness of the ugly seal.

>>32205457
You are the only one talking about Primarina, though
no one else is

>>32205462
>>32205242

>>32205462
>implying the post quoted have no ugly mons
the guzma one is a meta post so it counts too

>>32205462
>deleting the post
pussy

File: 1189201-ludicolo04.jpg (39KB, 446x501px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 446x501px

Look at this ugly fucker and tell me that there is a good God watching over this plane.

>>32205459
How dare you insult my child

File: img000035.jpg (997KB, 1127x1600px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 1127x1600px

>>32205242

File: 1475366181618.png (700KB, 1024x1002px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 1024x1002px

>>32205242
>tfw N

File: 1490288019520.png (7KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 205x246px

>>32205242

File: image.jpg (97KB, 800x615px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 800x615px

>>32205242

>>32205469
Read the thread, dumbfuck

>>32205995
I did, one person is talking about primarina negatively. If it's more than one, it doesn't look like it anymore because of all the falseflagging.

>>32206010
Whoops, meant to say samefagging.

File: 250px-729Brionne_FULL.png (742KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 1280x1280px

>>32202196
Can this get 1,000,000 replies?

File: 1479306843259.jpg (1MB, 1600x2121px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x2121px

>>32205242

>150 posts
>4 unique IPs
really strains the old noodle

File: f16bd3516d27ab29fb8dd9b88a65ae8153355d9d_hq.gif (784KB, 499x374px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 499x374px

>>32205242

File: 145 vs 41.png (2KB, 161x48px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 161x48px

Why is this allowed?

>>32206039
>psywave for poison and fighting
>bywave
this page fills me with many feelings

File: 1490885666846.png (144KB, 381x367px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 381x367px

>>32206042