>when someone refers to Cobalion, Virizion, Keldeo and Terrakion as "the Muskedeers"
>>32194581
>when someone refers to the legendary dogs as "beast bros"
>>32194581
I want to give Virizion my sword.
>>32194581
I'm going to start doing it from now on actually, I like the sound of it
>>32194591
>when someone refers to the legendary beasts as "the legendary dogs"
>>32194581
>legendary birds
>legendary dogsinb4 they're not dogs!, whatever
>The reggies
>Lake trio
>Genies and musketeers
>i don't remember what the gen 6 legendary group was
>Tapus
>>32194607
>i don't remember what the gen 6 legendary group was
There wasn't one, which is why Gen VI is the_bestgen
>>32194612
since when does the presence of a sub-legendary group make a gen the best? What a faulty qualification that is.
>>32194607
You forgot the UBs in gen 7
>>32194612
someone fucked up
>>32194637
To be fair though, Ultra Beasts are the only group with a given name that people always use when refering to them.
>when someone refers to pokemon as "bros"
1 2 3 4
>>32194682
WHAT DOES HE HAVE IN STORE?
>>32194674
The absolute worst
>>32194674
>>32194714
>when someone refers to a legendary pokemon as their "bro"
even worse
>>32194581
Yeah, "the Muskedeer" is the proper term for plural still.
>When someone refers to the Legendary Beasts as dogs
Suicune I can understand, but fuck you got to have the biggest case of autism to call a sabertooth tiger a dog.
>>32194581
>when someone refers to the eevee line as eeveelutions
>calling pocket monsters "pokémon"
Kill them all.
>>32196666
REEEEEEEEEEEE N GEEEEEEET OUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTT
>not "loving" all Pokemon
>>32196666
>>32196424
>eevee
>line
Here's the point.
.Here's your head.
>>32194581
>when someone refers to frogposters as people
>>32194607
>The dogsThey're owls.
>The reggies
>Reggies
My sides. Why did I never think of this before.
>>32194744
...True.
>>32196424
>Eeveelutions
Isn't that canon tho?
>>32194581
>when people call the Kami the "Genies"
>>32194593
Me too.
>>32194593
I want Virizion to give me his sword