why /vp/ dont want a new pokemon game on switch?

I don't want to buy a console for like, 1 or 2 games.

>>32178018
Terrified of change. These kids still haven't gotten over the switch from DS to 3DS, poor things. It's tough moving on from your first platform.

>>32178067
This, people here still whine because the transition to 3d

File: 1394683645150.gif (1MB, 270x235px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 270x235px

>>32178067
>wanting main series pokemon to be moved to a DOA Console

>le /vp/ is one person maymay
Ebin.

That said I don't mind the series moving to a new platform. But not right now. It's too soon from Sun and Moon's release for new games.

Poor Fags

File: 1443482385490.jpg (60KB, 509x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 509x720px

>>32178124
>DOA Console
HAHAHAHA

File: switchtansides.jpg (103KB, 1000x639px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1000x639px

>>32178124

I would like a switch game

>>32178194

It won't get third party support. Guaranfuckingteed because it is so underpowered.

No system can be successful without third party support. First party alone can't save nintendo, but them losing 4 consoles in a row sure gives me lots of hope! (I know the wii was successful but not software attach rate wise)

>>32178183

Maybe you rich people can make the Switch a success like you did the wii u!

Fuck off

>>32178264
>I know the wii was successful but not software attach rate wise
The attach rate of the wii as 9:1

>>32178289

Yeah, for wii sports and carnival games and dance waggle 2012

>>32178264
Wii had an amazing attach rate and won its generation by any metric you care to name.

As long as they drop the 3DS I don't care what its on.

Poorfags. That's literally the only reason.

>muh portability
it's BARELY larger than a 3DS XL. If it bothers you that much just get a fucking bag just like anyone else with a tablet.

>muh battery life
stop pretending you actually play your 3DS outside enough to need more than 3 hours. As long as it's lasts for a bus or a train ride it's good enough.

>>32179130
There another one anon, Nintendo do't deserve support, the Switch could had much better if Nintendo took the same risk that it did in the 3DS price cut

>>32179130
>it's BARELY larger than a 3DS XL. If it bothers you that much just get a fucking bag just like anyone else with a tablet.
It's more bulkier than a 3DS XL isn't?
>stop pretending you actually play your 3DS outside enough to need more than 3 hours. As long as it's lasts for a bus or a train ride it's good enough.
Fair enough, this is true

>>32179202
>It's more bulkier than a 3DS XL isn't?
It's just wider but thinner. In terms of weight they're almost the same. Lighter than the 3DS XL without joycon and slightly heavier with joycon.

>>32178018
Because the switch is more expensive than any of the previous new consoles before it, Pokémon is literally the only thing I would want to play on it and the Switch apparently bricks itself if you look at it wrong while the stars aren't aligned.

>>32178231
Okay, that's a new one. Saving.

>>32178264
Nintendo is reaching out to the Steam Indie crowd, which is why we're getting / have gotten 24 indie titles in the upcoming months.

Still looking forward to Yooka Laylee, despite the politics thing.

>>32179536
Bricks itself? The only problem I've heard of is the left joycon thing (the manufacturer put the antenna on the inside of the grip, causing interference), and Nintendo is offering free replacement on those, hell, fixing it only takes 1" of antenna wire and a bit of solder, if you DIY.

>>32178067
>le underage meme

Nice "argument".

>>32178018
I have only one problem with main games on Switch

GF clearly struggled with 3ds, you can easily see how much less content we've been getting in 3ds games in comparison to the DS ones.

Im afraid with Switch it will be even worse. Im pretty sure first Switch game will be filled with problems if DP and XY are any indication. The difference here is that after DP gamefreak recovered and all the games Pt-BW2 were awesome. But after XY GF showed pretty much the same level on ORAS and SM. Thats a bad sign for the future

>>32179130
>not wanting to mindlessly throw your money at Nintendo means your poor

Simply epic. Let me know when the Switch has a decent library, then I'll buy it. Not spending $300 just to play Pokemon.

I don't don't know why you fags are pretending the 3ds had some spectacular third party support.

>>32179601
Personally I think GF was restricted by the 3ds shitty hardware. They clearly wanted to make something bigger with SM.
At the very least we can get rotation and triple battles back.

>>32178018
isn't the switch intended to replace the wii-u, not the 3DS? i don't imagine we'll get a mainline game on it if that is the case.

>>32179607
>Let me know when the Switch has a decent library, then I'll buy it.
It already does.

>>32179615
I dont buy that they tried to do something bigger

They're a company with a massive experience and this wasnt their first 3ds game, it was third so they should've known what are their limitations. Look at freaking Yo-kai watch games. Whether you like it orr not there's no denying its a good example of a well done game at least from technicalities prepective. GF tried to do better graphics and it failed on may levels, limiting their options. Look at all those unfinished cities and halfbaked caves. Then there's all the lags and empty post game. Thats not a job well done

i want a pokeymans maingame for switch.

>>32179627
>Look at all those unfinished cities and halfbaked caves.
I think you guys need to accept that no pokemon game is fully finished.
Gen 1 had like 36 missing pokemon. GS was supposed to have a Safari Zone.
If they remove stuff its usually because of their deadlines, the hardware, their incompetence or all of them.

>>32179633
too bad the only thing you have to look forward to is 3rd rate party games and a lame concept game made by an unknown developer

>faggots think there'll be a 3ds successor

>>32179646
Sure first two gens were also unfinished but they were on Gameboy and that was the beggning for them. Gens 3-5 showed that they're capable of so much more but then gen 6 and 7 showed they've started to struggle again. SM is even more disappoinint than XY in that regard since they had a lot more free time this time around and most of the Pokemon models came from XY anyway

>>32178018
Because I don't want a fucking tablet for a handheld, nor do I want to pay online for Pokémon.

>>32178067
>terrified of change
How to spot someone without an argument. The go-to excuse for anything.

File: IMG_0149.png (70KB, 365x434px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 365x434px

>>32179621
>doesn't even have first party titles besides Zelda, which is already on the Wii U

>>32179682
>Wii U
Well fuck me, I am gonna to purchase the game for a know dead console. Fuck the SWITCH, there is no promise, no future there.

>>32179713
>know
*known

Because switch is ass and definitely not worth 350€, not counting any games or extra equipment

>>32178018
I'm not paying $400 for the switch and "accessories" just so I can play yet another one of GameFreak's cheap games on Nintendo's cheap console

>>32179653

Game Freak has always been incompetent. If it wasn't for Iwata stepping in during Gold and Silver's development, then we wouldn't have been able to go to Kanto.

>>32179872
>Game Freak has always been incompetent.
this

File: a90e255a2ab53f89bd129cae41de36f9.png (581KB, 593x396px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 593x396px

>>32178018
>no second screen for menus

>>32179956
so things go back to how they were during "the good ol days", why is this a problem?

>>32178067
im not a cuck who'll go from wiiu to switch
im a fag who learns his lessons
switch is gonna flop too, and almost noone in japan will buy a switch to play pokemon for 3 hours

Honestly it's because at the moment, the Switch just seems like a liability.

Well, I'd only be getting the Switch for Pokemon, and:
>>32179601
>GF clearly struggled with 3ds
>Im afraid with Switch it will be even worse

This. Unless they are completely restructuring their staff and who is in charge, I have little faith in the next title. It usually takes a whole for GF to get used to a new development platform, and this is going to be their biggest leap yet.

>>32179615
>Personally I think GF was restricted by the 3ds shitty hardware.
That is absolutely wrong. Square Enix and Level 5 have made far more competent Jrpgs that have taken advantage of the 3DS hardware far more than any 3DS Pokemon game, and they all run better too.
GF can't even figure out the advantage of using lower poly battle models for Pokemon.

>>32179646
They should outsource the development and dedicate to what they are good for: marketing.

>>32178018
because i don't have a switch yet

>>32179956
Not like SM really made use of them anyway, did it? Switching to a menu screen works fine in other games, provided it can be done quickly and the UI isn't shit.

So not looking good for Pokemon anyway, but still.

>>32179989
>Wanting a useless second screen
>Believing in a 3DS successor

File: IMG_0221.png (104KB, 258x248px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 258x248px

>>32180824
>using second screen to reduce clutter is useless

>>32178018
Dual screen Pokemon is hard to give up.

>>32180835
It was fine in the GB/GBA, it will be fine in the Switch

>>32179130
Well, high demand and low volume kind of fucks it and 300$ is more of a console price than a handheld price.

A certain amount of sellthrough is expected before they make more portable friendly SKUs.

File: IMG_6923.jpg (849KB, 2097x1388px) Image search: [Google]

849KB, 2097x1388px

>>32178264
This was from the Nintendo Switch presentation back in January. Lots of companies are jumping aboard the switch train.

>>32180898
Oh wow I can not wait for 2011 so I can finally play Skyrim.

I don't play video games enough to warrant a 300 dollar purchase + paid online since I bought my last 3 consoles/handhelds just to play Pokemon and Animal Crossing. I'd feel like if I didn't play everyday I'd be wasting the money I invested in it.

>>32179851
What accessories do you need that add $100 to the price tag?

>>32180904
>modless skyrim in 2017
they must be planning some kind of crossover content pack or something, what other incentive is there to purchase this version?

>>32180921
Is the Special Edition,updated graphic,DLC included (if I don't remember wrong),and....that's it,I don't remember if there is a Mod compatibility too.

To be quite honest I'd rather buy a dedicated Pokemon console.

>>32178018
because i don't want the bottom screen- UI shit to overlap my precious sceneries and you know gamefreak is stupid enough to do it.

>>32180920
pro controller

>>32178274
Get a fucking job. Don't complain about pokemon on switch because you can't afford it

>>32181408
What if I complain about the switch being a busted piece of shit

>>32180851
Yeah if you want GBA games. The other games actually utilize the second screen without having to clutter the main screen.

>>32181418
Have u seen the 3ds. The main gimmicks. Pokemon doesn't even use 240p. It's garbage

>>32178018
paid online, no more bottom screen, hardware is baraly above the 3DS anyway, hope some miracle will happen in the future and GF separes from Nintendo (while retaining full rights to the franchise) and decide to start releasing their games on Steam like Giga Wrecker

>>32178018
GameFreak is lazy and incompetent, the more they increase production values, the more problems we're going to run into.

>>32181599
>le graphics autism
wew laddielad

>>32178018
Because paid online is going to suck hard if all I want to do is use the wonder trade every once in a while and maybe enter a Battle competition for a mega stone of my favorite Pokemon.

>>32181620
>being this wrong

Game Freak is the problem, not Nintendo.

Who the fuck enjoys 2 screens

>>32181620
>hardware is baraly above the 3DS anyway

I hope you're not serious.

>>32181750
both are shit but Nintendo is just pure cancer

It's a shit console that requires me to buy a second screen I'll never use.

>>32180898
This is before release anon, I'm sure after companies see the awful sales they will back out you just wait :)

>>32182863
Are you not aware of how well the switch had been selling?

>>32184041
Well for Nintendo I guess since they're so used to doing so bad right now. This is coming from a very big nintendo fan as well stop being so blind

>>32180898
BTFO NINTENDO FAGS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6q96pkpLFI&list=LL37HR1vNjaYTX9ahTadSO0w&index=1

>>32181750
boii
if it was up to gamefreak only they'd stick to 3ds only
it's no secret that they give two shits more for the japanese fanbase than for the western fanbase

and since jap gaming is mostly reduced to portable consoles as tiny as their dicks it's brutally obvious how the switch, with it's three hour battery life and relatively big size, won't fucking fly with them

>>32178018
I expect a pokemon main game coming to nintendo switch in november 2018, that's why they haven't announced anything for this year

>>32181620
>hope some miracle will happen in the future and GF separes from Nintendo (while retaining full rights to the franchise)
It will never happen , an if it happens pokemon games will go to smartphones not to steam

Reminder that the switch has the exact same battery life as the 3ds and is roughly the same size.

>>32184402
>if it was up to gamefreak only they'd stick to 3ds only
Given the technical quality of their last three attempts at 3DS titles, that's not exactly a good thing. It's just been getting worse too. Either Gamefreak needs to change direction and buckle down on optimization that other JRPGS have managed to do right with the 3DS, or just move over to the Switch where at least they'll have some more breathing room for their incompetence for another gen or two.

>>32185915
>They only did okay in gen 3 and 5
I don't think that hardware is the problem

File: the richfag argument.png (38KB, 578x712px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 578x712px

>>32178067
>le terrified of change maymay :^)
No, it's called being smart with your money.
There's literally no reason to buy a console that will either:
1. Break easily
2. monetize off of trading, and battling online. (Hell, we're already cucked for transfering.)
3. Will be scrapped by Nintendo for not meeting sales expectations like the Wii U.

>>32178018
I dont want to pay 330$ for a new console. Still. I CAN'T pay 330$.

>>32181426
Other anon is stupid
What he should have said is "it was fine for Battle Revolution"

File: 1482269173763.png (118KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 540x304px

>>32179973
>m-muh good ol days
nostalgiafags are the cancer killing pokemon

Let me put it this way; if the Switch Pokemon and Switch Fire Emblem are like Fates and Sun/Moon, I'm not buying it.

I like both of those games, but I don't want them again.

>>32178264
Autism: the new age

>>32178018
Honestly the main thing that bothers me about it is the paid online service.

That and the fact that the only game worth getting on it right now is Zelda. If a Pokemon and Monster Hunter game were already available for the Switch I'd be more inclined to buy it.

>>32187813
then just wait until those games come out if they ever do no one is telling you to buy one now

>>32180807
That's probably because GF knew about switch previously and removed yet another feature for future games.

>>32187813
Not even shilling but BoTW runs better on WiiU if we were to believe the ultra autists that speedrun the game

>>32178067
Gen 2 worked on a 1989 Gameboy, there was no reason for the change other than for Nintendo to shill their new gimmick console.

>>32188854
it's true actually
weirdly enough it's a port with less optimization

>>32180000
Well it's good thing they already all bought one for Splatoon.

>>32178018
I've got a Switch and would love the next game to be on it, but I doubt it will be if it's this year.

Historically, Game Freak have always waited until a console has a high adoption rate and a reduced price before releasing a game on it.

Gen 2: 1.5 years after GBC (plus it could be played on original Game Boy)
Gen 3: 2 years after GBA
Gen 4: 2 years after DS
Gen 6: 3 years after 3DS

>>32187813
>I don't want Pokémon to be on the Switch because I don't want to buy one
>I don't want to buy a Switch because there's no Pokémon on it
Huh.

>>32178018
autism resulting in to change

anyone with a brain would look at sun and moon's performance and see the necessity to move to more powerful hardware

>>32179655
>I don't want a tablet, I want a fisher price clamshell flip phone!

It's the SAME SHIT you tard

>>32189536
*aversion to change

>>32178018
Because Pokemon is becoming shit, and once it switches to a new console I'm done with the series. Not because I'm afraid of change or some shit, but because at this point it's not worth a buying a new console over, especially a console I'll never use again after I beat the game (which would surely have no post-game content).

>>32189489
>gen 8: 4 years after switch

>>32178264
>It won't get third party support.
So every Nintendo product ever since the end of the Sega wars?

>>32189560
why are you here?

>>32189598
Hope.

>>32180898
Not that guy, but literally every console gets a picture like that of a load of developers who end up releasing one port, which everybody ignores, then never doing anything again. Wii U had a huge number of companies to boast at its announcement. Wii had a huge number of large developers active for it, but they weren't games anybody wanted.

All of the Switch's best-selling games will be 1st/2nd party games and after two years 3rd parties will stop bothering.

>>32188854
Even in handheld mode?

>>32189668
Why would handheld mode run better? I assume speedrunners would pick the mode that runs the best regardless of how inconvenient it is.

Cry babys, the thread.

>>32189682
Handheld mode is widely reported to run better, probably because it runs at 720p rather than the 900p that docked mode uses.
I don't really know why they wouldn't just keep it 720p for both though.

>>32189682
Handheld mode is 720p and docked mode is 1080p.

So, same reason a PC game runs better at lower res.

File: ihatetotellyoubut[1].gif (14KB, 300x355px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x355px

>>32189703
>1080p

>>32189690
>reported
Again, I trust autistic speedrunners over clickbaity articles or shills that don't actually know what they're talking about, see the comment below as example

>>32189703
>1080p
see this is what I mean, just shills not even aware of what they're talking about, why should I trust them over the autists that watch the same cutscenes 100 times a day?

>>32189716
What? are you basing 900p on Zelda?

Because the Switch supports 1080p, it was just forced down to 900p for BotW because it wouldn't run properly.

Luckily, I think consoles are retarded and literally never dock my Switch.

>>32189726
>Luckily, I think consoles are retarded and literally never dock my Switch.

Now this is autism

You realize it's the exact same thing, right?

File: IMG_0761.jpg (45KB, 188x280px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 188x280px

>>32189536
>thinking more powerful hardware solves everything
>when the issue is Game Freak's incompetence while other developers can get more out of the 3DS than them

>>32180921
welcome to nintendo

where they throw an event to celebrate playing a 6 year old game because they think nobody buys other consoles

>see: bayonetta, Mass effect, Resi-evil Etc.

>>32189534
>buying a console for one game

"Mommy buys my shit" detected

>>32189718
>>reported
documented

>>32178018
>Posts youtube video of nothing but Switch Issues since Launch
I refuse to buy an early beta of the eventual Switch XL

>>32190137
it's "the same thing" except now i have to chain myself in front of a TV i will never use for anything else to use it.

the only use for consoles is better specs. the switch has the same specs regardless, so fuck that.

>>32190137
the dock is an almost empty piece of plastic with barely a charger and a screen converter

File: oh god no.png (195KB, 295x316px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 295x316px

>>32190137
>Not wanting the dock to scratch my screen

>>32178099
It's been 4 years, if people aren't used to it by now they need to move on from gaming as a hobby.

>>32189534
What the fuck are you talking about? I said my main issue with the Switch is the paid online service. If a Pokemon game on the level of Colloseum and Gale of Darkness gets released on the Switch I'd be hyped as hell.

>>32178045
>I don't want to buy a console for like, 1 or 2 games.

you bought a gameboy, gameboy advanced, ds, and 3ds all for pokemon. what do you meann

>>32188854

That is impossible. I've played both versions and Wii U BOTW shits itself up majorly when I'm in Kakariko. Switch only slow downs in Korok Forest, and it does it less than Wii U did.

File: 1485903424566.jpg (994KB, 1200x1734px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 1200x1734px

>>32178018
>underpowered for a console
>too big for a handheld (can't fit in my pocket)
>expensive, but won't have any games

I still hope for Gen 4 remakes in Gen 7. If a switch game is not main-series I will not care about its existence.

I do want a new game on Switch, preferably in around 6 months to a year when I'll be moving out of my current place

>>32178018
Because mommy won't buy them a new console.
>You already have a Nintendo

How about you switch board back to /v/, shill faggots.

>>32192217
We just got done with the forest on the Wii u with no slowdown, so maybe this isn't all that cut and dry

>>32192217
If the game slows down at all the console isn't good enough

>have to buy two switches if both my kids want to play
>much more expensive than handhelds
What a load of rubbish, just another gimmicky cash grab.

>>32194895
>Much more expensive than handhelds
3DS was $250 at launch
Switch was $300 at launch

With inflation, that's almost exactly the same, and significantly cheaper than PSP or Vita.

dont really want a total new game but a port would be cool, its hard to enjoy sun/moon with all these fps drops.

>>32194938
Inflation rates aren't the same in the UK as they are in America.
3DS was £229.99 at launch from HMV, Switch is £279.99. Inflation rates for 3DS original would have it at over £20 cheaper today.

>>32194990
*£20 cheaper today than the Switch is.

>>32194938
>>32194990
American inflation rates put the Switch at $30 dollars more than the 3DS would be today. Double that an extra $60.

>>32194885

By your logic every single Nintendo system is not good enough because every single one has had games too big for constant 30 or 60 FPS. The 3DS being particularly bad since it has framerate issues in a super non-interactive RPG like Pokemon. Hell it stutters a little in Mario 3D Land if alot is going on-screen.

Scratch that to every system. Bloodborne has drops in PS4 Pro.

>>32178194
>this is what /v/ really believes
man so many kids on this website nowadays and they never even grew up with the GOOD Nintendo.

>>32194895
can't they just share?

>>32187721
I feel you. I expect a console mainline Pokemon game to be a brand new experience, or at least a huge leap in presentation and content. Not just a new 3DS game with better graphics. If we end up with the same battle animations as the last two generations, I might be taking another break from Pokemon.