Too many casuals!!

File: bkub2.png (195KB, 417x578px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 417x578px

>>32107973
A pity post, from me to (You).

what is this?

File: 1489811525557.png (151KB, 797x449px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 797x449px

o shit Popplio line lover whose favourite Generation is 5

File: Screenshot_2017-03-18-21-32-40-01.jpg (149KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 540x960px

Had the hope this wasn't writed right
Good pasta though

I really hope you're falseflagging cause this shit isn't even worth a (You)

File: 6F56740B-54F6-47BE-B91A-101258C5E7ED-354-0000003FB032A2CC_tmp.jpg (11KB, 247x204px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 247x204px

>>32107973
>Gen V designs
>Better than Popplios line
Absolutely irredeemable shit taste.

>>32107973
All I wanted was a national dex. Thats all.
It wasn't too much to ask, but I guess exploration and collection are taking a backseat to making a visual novel.

File: 1484480381486.png (263KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1000x562px

Gen 7 was good, Popplio is good and Gen 5 also is pretty good. Why do people in /vp/ (I know this goes for everywhere on 4chan, but here is 10x worse) are so concerned with normies and casuals by the way? Is it because they are cringy or some stupid shit like that? What did they ever do to you?

You are probably a casual at something too OP, don't forget that we are all just vagina farts.

>>32107973
I dislike the Popplio line's floppy, too long flipper-arms but fuck off dude, we get enough shitposting as it is. I love both gen 5 and 7.

Nice b8, looks like people fell for it hard

>>32107997
Thanks anon.
>>32108094
Die.
>>32108098
Can't you read? It's not a pasta.
>>32108101
Fuck off and choke on a chode.
>>32108140
Just because you have Shit taste anon.
>>32108151
This.
>>32108168
Gen 7 was NOT good.>>32108173
Yes, but, unfortunately, I'm neither shitposting not lying.
>>32108187
It's not bait either.

All and all, you've failed. All of you. You either said I had Shit taste, called it a pasta, bait, or just straight up shitposting. Some of you even shitposter yourselves. Only 1 anon got even close to it. I'm truly ashamed to frequent this place. I mean, what kind of sick twisted delusion do you have to have just to think someone isn't being 100% serious just because you disagree? Well Fuck you guys. No wonder /vp/ is dying.

File: 1488050013593.jpg (265KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1280x720px

>>32109120
>tells others to die for liking a Pokemon
>wants to be taken seriously

File: Stardust Keksaders.jpg (204KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1280x720px

>>32109120
I can smell the euphoria from here

>>32109120
>Only 1 anon got even close to it.
If you mean >>32108151 then that was me.

At least somebody around here agrees with me I suppose. Keep fighting the good fight, even if they call you a shitposter.

>>32109144
>telling cancer to die for summing up what used to be a good board
>having anything to do with an ugly starter, and somehow nothing to do with the anons throwing (you)'s out like candy and calling everything shitposting or pasta
Oh wow anon, it's almost like I miss How /vp/ was before Gen 7 and Go, when the normies and >>rebbit invaded. Shocking, huh.

>>32109157
Well, I mean, I'm mostly just trying to prove how cancerous gen 7 made this board, not that Go didn't help. These days it's all weavile/goodrafags, "le pasta/shitposting/gen 7/Primarina tranny" memeing, or (you)ing something just because. We used to be something, right? How did this smut become us?

>>32109120
>>32109217
I don't think you're a falseflagger because you hate Gen 7. Let's face it quite a handful of people here do, and there's valid reasons too. It's the fucking cringy disclaimer, P.S. and the fact you posted it soon after a thread shitting on Gen 5 fans by poor coincidence. Also Gen 5 is the root of plenty of the flaws of the gens that came after and you know it. Introducing over 150 new mons and the PWT don't change that.

>>32109217
You have porn spergs shitting the place up every so often really asshurt when you report their shit.

Some time ago the entire board was just 100% furry shit, porn, and shitposting until a mod finally showed up. The cracks were s howing during X/Y, but everybody held out hope gen 7 would have more content.

Since it didn't, here we are. Nothing better to do but shitpost apparently.

>>32107973
>Thinking his opinions are facts
Go shove a stick in your ass.

File: 1480218655885.jpg (460KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 900x900px

>>32109178
>I miss how /vp/ was before gen 7 and go
It's always been shit here, anon. I've been here since halfway through gen 5 and not once have I thought to myself "this is a good board." There are always normies, there are always underage, and there are always idiots like you trying to pass their shitty opinion off as if it were a fact. If you can't deal with it, get the fuck out.

File: voltorb (pokemon).png (239KB, 1482x895px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1482x895px

>>32107973
All you young whippersnappers with your Gens 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

The last good Pokemon game was Crystal.

Also:
>However, I have an amazing sense of style, excellent taste, and a mind for the facts
Appeal to authority fallacy. You can't just be like "my opinion is substantiated on facts" but then not actually share what those facts are. If you let yourself use that kind of rhetoric, there's no way you can know your opinion is based in fact, no matter how knowledgeable you are.

>>32107973
Already replied but going in for a more detailed critique.

>However, I have an amazing sense of style, excellent taste, and a mind for the facts, so, while you may disagree, it's safe to say that my opinion is as close to fact as any subjective piece of literature can be, and it's probably a good idea to think on my words here today.
appeal to authority fallacy (see previous response)

>As far as I'm concerned, anyone who says Gen 7 was good, Popplio is good, or Gen 5 is bad, is a filthy casual, a normy, and has no right to be here.
I have a considerable multiplex of qualms with this opinion.
1) You've said nothing to defend Gen 5 except by saying Gen 7 is worse. Personally I dislike them both. Gen 6 was a huge upgrade to the technology of the main series, but other than that, it wasn't very good either. Gen 3 was decent-ish, Gen 4 was where things started getting a little silly, Gen 5 went completely off the rails, and the series has been shit ever since.
2) I'm not a casual gamer. On the contrary, I MAKE games. That's about as far afield of casual as you can get. But there's nothing wrong with being a casual gamer. Casuals aren't "filthy casuals," they're just casuals.
3) Same thing with conforming to social norms. People who choose to live out their lives conforming to social norms aren't "normies," they're just normal. Also, you shouldn't equate casuals to normal people. Not all casuals are normal people, and not all normal people are casuals. Some don't even game, and some are very involved in gaming but are also very involved in their ordinary and unremarkable lives.
4) Everyone has a right to be here until the mods say otherwise. Websites aren't democracies, they're totalitarian republics: places of discourse upheld purely as a service to the people, which may be voluntarily revoked if and ONLY IF said people act contrary to the will of the provider of said service, whose word is law. Your opinion has no bearing on others' rights.

>>32108098
what the fuck happened to your screenshot

>>32109780
>The last good Pokemon game was Crystal.
>implying anything before Gen 5 was good

kys

>>32109780
What's Crystal?

File: 2b4df1f4e76abd80b15bb82846b4c1fb.png (193KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 800x533px

>>32109780
>the gen that reused kanto pokemon like crazy and has the worst level balance in the series
Shut the fuck up. I love johto but to say the last good game was crystal is ignorance.

>>32107973
Gen 7 was shit.
>small
>easy
>small
>no post game
>small
>no nat dec
>small

I m neutral for popplio line. I was not excited at all but it's pokemon I can't be seriously mad about it.

Gen 5 is my favorite. I ve replayed it more times than I d like to admit. (B2W2 specifically)
I think they really took pokemon a meaningful step forward on gen five that wasn't on the aesthetic/new technology/3d side.

>>32110058
>the gen that reused kanto pokemon exactly as much as they deserved to be reused and has the level balance in the series that makes for the most interesting and varied training experience
ftfy

>>32110090
>varied
>interesting
According to what I see here that's not the case. Unless using Ampharos, Pidgeot and a Gen 2 eeveelution 1000 times is interesting and varied.

>>32110090
Are seriously telling me you would rather reuse the same kanto pokemon then try new pokemon? Every game should be like BW, new pokemon only and old ones in the post game.

Also
>wild pokemon after the 8th badge will still be around early-mid 20's
>"balance"

I love johto, I seriously do, but it is shitty in a lot of ways. They were too scared it might not be the success that was kanto and were too safe.

>>32110164
>Every game should be like BW
No, it should be like B2W2, a good half and half/slight new Pokemon bias. And no, before you make the same fucking projection everyone like you does, I don't cry about not using a team of specifically 6 Gen 1 Pokemon. The all new Pokemon thing was the only thing that made me able to stand BW actually, it's just that the idea reeks of "stop playing like how I don't want you to play". New Pokemon being more prominent than old Pokemon while not being the only thing there retains the flexibility while still clearly showing off the new options frequently.

>>32110164
>Are seriously telling me you would rather reuse the same kanto pokemon then try new pokemon?
No, I'm telling you I'd rather have both than either. And that's what Gen 2 gives us. The generations that come after are too focused on the new Pokemon.

>wild pokemon after the 8th badge will still be around early-mid 20's
This is a good design choice. It makes you spend longer training them. Pokemon is at heart a calm and meditative game, you shouldn't always be in a rush to get to the next gym or beat the champion. What was the slogan again? "Gotta catch 'em all?"

>>32110145
>According to what I see here that's not the case. Unless using Ampharos, Pidgeot and a Gen 2 eeveelution 1000 times is interesting and varied.
Who the hell even plays like this?

>>32110179
Fine, I get you. Gen 5 did it best, new only in first game and a mix in sequel. I admit I was being a bit extteme but seeing people like that guy pisses me. They're the people that complain about pokemon without ever trying anything new, the people that use the same six pokemon every playthrough. Just hate those people.

>>32110204
see: >>32110195
>No, I'm telling you I'd rather have both than either. And that's what Gen 2 gives us. The generations that come after are too focused on the new Pokemon.

>>32110195
>too focused on new pokemon
How fucking retarded are you? Of fucking course they are, new pokemon are arguably the biggest reason to play a new gen. Having a balance of new and old is good but johto is not that. You seriously think people found pokemon like murkrow, slugma, dunsparce, heracross, and so many more without a guide? Hoenn did this good, mostly new with some old thrown in in case you want a favorite back.

>>32110195
Just saying almost every GSC team feels at least 50% the same here, and who could blame people. This is the game where the level curve is it at its most annoying and Pokemon lose the opportunity to get great TM coverage compared to others for not having arms so there's not much to work with. I tried doing a playthrough without what I considered to be the 6/7 most commonly used mons in GSC ingame teams. Pretty much had to rely on the Gen 1 trade evos, and though I will say I had fun, it felt like most mons I'd want to use were garbage to the point using them wasn't fun. I mean of course that's not to say that's always the case, but it just goes to show that Johto's amount of fun options feels very cramped. I'd get your point on the low-leveled wilds if Pokegear rematches were more frequent or, preferably, there were a lot more optional areas with trainers to meet and battle. That way leveling your Pokemon would feel more like you're bonding with them in battle against other trainers rather than the chore of grinding down Raticate. Sorry if I did a shit job getting my point across cause I feel like I just typed an incoherent mess.

>>32110204
The reverse applies to me. People like you tend to get trigger-happy because of some people being sad they can't reuse maybe just one bro that might not even be from an earlier gen. I will say I'd still be okay if somehow they decided to do all new Pokemon again. Probopass has been in 4 games in a row now anyway, I think I can go a game or two without my nigga.

>>32110227
>How fucking retarded are you? Of fucking course they are, new pokemon are arguably the biggest reason to play a new gen.
If you introduce new Pokemon, you have to keep the old ones. Otherwise, you're just sculpting the same world with different artwork. If you want to create the impression of a new world, you need the old world there to compare it to and intertwine it with.

>Having a balance of new and old is good but johto is not that. You seriously think people found pokemon like murkrow, slugma, dunsparce, heracross, and so many more without a guide?
Huh? You mean you didn't?
Do you mean to tell me you actually had trouble getting Pokemon such as Stantler, Ledyba, Aron, Swinub, Hitmontop, Togepi, Elekid, Phanpy, Houndour, Teddiursa, and Delibird?

>Hoenn did this good, mostly new with some old thrown in in case you want a favorite back.
Not enough old. They made the mistake of almost entirely replacing the old world with a new world that wasn't different enough to stand on its own as "new" in a profound way. They should have included more Gen 1 and/or 2 Pokemon, if you don't have something to compare it against then it just feels like the same shit with a new coat of paint.

>>32107973
>I have an amazing sense of style, excellent taste, and a mind for the facts, so, while you may disagree, it's safe to say that my opinion is as close to fact as any subjective piece of literature can be, and it's probably a good idea to think on my words here today.
This is the mentality of a pre-teen.

>>32110259
>Just saying almost every GSC team feels at least 50% the same here, and who could blame people. This is the game where the level curve is it at its most annoying and Pokemon lose the opportunity to get great TM coverage compared to others for not having arms so there's not much to work with. I tried doing a playthrough without what I considered to be the 6/7 most commonly used mons in GSC ingame teams. Pretty much had to rely on the Gen 1 trade evos, and though I will say I had fun, it felt like most mons I'd want to use were garbage to the point using them wasn't fun. I mean of course that's not to say that's always the case, but it just goes to show that Johto's amount of fun options feels very cramped. I'd get your point on the low-leveled wilds if Pokegear rematches were more frequent or, preferably, there were a lot more optional areas with trainers to meet and battle. That way leveling your Pokemon would feel more like you're bonding with them in battle against other trainers rather than the chore of grinding down Raticate. Sorry if I did a shit job getting my point across cause I feel like I just typed an incoherent mess.
I think I get what you're saying, but there's a sweet spot you're leaving out in-between "every good team feels at least 50% the same" and "every team with variety is shitty." The sweet spot is where you play through with the realization that there's no need to have the best team. I've actually found the game is more fun when I use the Pokemon I like and settle for the fact that they'll never be strong enough to OHKO everyone, because frankly I'd rather be challenged. But not so challenged that it becomes unplayable, which is why I don't use a team of six Sunkerns.

>>32110269
So you think every gen needs to bring back enough kanto pokemon to not "replace the old world"? But if you bring kanto back every gen does it not get tiring? Also how would bringing more new pokemon then old "feel like the same shit with a new coat of paint"? Mayne if you playec the last game then you would know how the new ones differ.

Also on the issue of those pokemon if you honestly think the average player found most of those you're just an idiot. A majority of johto pokemon were either hidden in ridiculous spots, made kanto only, had a less then 15% chance to encounter, appeared at a specific time of day, or a combination of these. They were neglected since GF was probably nervouse that gen 2 wouldn't be the success that kanto was. That's somewhat understanable but it sucks.

>>32110312
The closest thing that can be gotten to sweet spot as far I can see in GSC is having a couple of the mons on almost every team like Red Gyarados and Umbreon or something along with a weak link like Ariados or almost any Grass in the maingame snuggled in there. I've used less optimal options in single player before I mean I took a Nosepass to the E4 in Emerald a while back, but even something like that feels more fun than trying to use a good majority of the shitmons in GSC. I guess it could be argued that it makes team composition more important, but still.

>>32109178
>/vp/
>ever good
>/tr/
>ever good

>>32110195
>Pokemon is at heart a calm and meditative game

"All of the objective flaws in Johto are actually boons when you look at the series from my completely subjective point of view"

>>32110327
>So you think every gen needs to bring back enough kanto pokemon to not "replace the old world"? But if you bring kanto back every gen does it not get tiring?
No, not Kanto Pokemon specifically, just previously established Pokemon in general. It would indeed get tiring if in every generation, you brought back the same old Pokemon.

>Also how would bringing more new pokemon then old "feel like the same shit with a new coat of paint"? Mayne if you playec the last game then you would know how the new ones differ.
It's exactly like if you played Legend of Zelda for the NES, you liked it, and they came out with Zelda II, but instead of being Adventure of Link, it was just Legend of Zelda again, except with an all-new overworld map and all-new dungeons. That's not worthy to be called a game in its own right. There are two directions you can go from there: you can make various overhauls and advancements to the fundamental format of the game, and/or you can tie it into the prequel to give a sense of continuity. The Zelda series usually goes for both, but the Pokemon series has carved out such a small and specific sort of genre for itself that it has to go for the latter technique, because any innovation it could seek through the prior technique would be either not enough to justify calling it a new game, or too much to justify still calling it Pokemon.

>Also on the issue of those pokemon the average player is just an idiot.
ftfy
>A majority of johto pokemon were either hidden in ridiculous spots,
>patch of grass in the middle of a required section of the game
>ridiculous spot
kek
>had a less then 15% chance to encounter, appeared at a specific time of day
If this is enough to stop you from finding a Pokemon, I don't know what you think you're doing calling other people casuals; hate to break it to you, but you're clearly one yourself.

>>32110366
Okay, I really thought you meant you want the same kanto pokemon to appear every gen just to say "You do remember kanto exists right".

On the encounter thimg then whatever. The average player who is just playing to battle isn't going to walk in circle trying to encounter whatever pokemon. I play only to battle, collecting has never held appeal to me. If that makes me "casual" then whatever.

>>32110269
>Aron
uh

>>32110377
>The average player who is just playing to battle isn't going to walk in circle trying to encounter whatever pokemon.
>The average player who is just playing to battle
Wow. There are people who really feel this way?
>I play only to battle, collecting has never held appeal to me. If that makes me "casual" then whatever.
No, it certainly doesn't. It makes you "casual" with regard to collecting, but definitely not with regard to battling -- and, by extent, definitely not with regard to the larger game, because the larger game is about both. But still, it's just bizarre and fascinating to me that there are even people out there who like Pokemon but don't care about collecting.

To me, Pokemon is about the Pokemon. It's not a strategy game; it's not a collecting game; it's a virtual pet game with strategy and collecting as key elements. I see collecting Pokemon as a way to meet them, and battling and move customization as a way to grow closer to them and take good care of them. (I know they're just mindless pixels on a screen, but I do get quite attached to them anyway.)

I've always just taken it for granted that that was what Pokemon was about. I've never even considered that some people don't feel that way.

>>32110414
..........
Are you human?
Do you like actually exist?

Are you sure your name isn't Red?

>>32110414
When I say battling I don't mean competetive. Competetive pokemon is garbage in both smogon and VGC. Pokemon is imbalanced and too RNG based, which is fine but not in competetive. What I mean is just havong fun battling. I mostly play more silly stuff like multis online with people around here. Most of my favorites are kind of shitty so I find fun ways to use them. Collecting is cool but feels pointless to me since most of the pokemon will do nothing but sit in my pc box.

>>32110440
>Collecting is cool but feels pointless to me since most of the pokemon will do nothing but sit in my pc box.
This is fair but I guess that comes down to your style when it comes to training. I always make a point of using the weakest Pokemon in my party the most at any given time, and pride myself on the narrowness of the gap between my weakest and strongest party Pokemon. I don't mind pulling out a disproportionately weak Pokemon from my box and grinding it for awhile if it would confer me a type advantage in an upcoming battle or a good use for a TM or HM; in fact, I find it more rewarding to train weak Pokemon to accomplish tasks than to just use the ones I already know are capable.
>When I say battling I don't mean competetive. Competetive pokemon is garbage in both smogon and VGC. Pokemon is imbalanced and too RNG based, which is fine but not in competetive. What I mean is just havong fun battling. I mostly play more silly stuff like multis online with people around here.
Oh.
For some reason I assumed you meant single-player battling.
Probably because I don't play two-player or multiplayer games.
This is probably also why I think Crystal was the last good Pokemon game.

>>32110414
Honestly? I admire your outlook on the series, but I don't think most people share this view of the game. It's... kind of a dated way to look at it.

That's not to say your view is wrong, just that when Pokemon first came out, Gotta Catch 'Em All was the catchphrase and it seemed actually attainable. The battle system was pretty poor, the story was lacking, but that didn't really matter because it was crazy fun to link cable up with a few buddies and try to get them all.

But there's a reason the catchphrase went away. There's so damn many of them. It's easy to say "fucking casuals are too impatient to just collect them like we always have", but get real here. There's 800+ of the damn things now. Can you do it? Yeah. But it's no stroll through Kanto like it used to be. It's a long haul stretch goal. Hell, SM doesn't even have a NatDex anymore, they seem to be sending the message that Gotta Catch 'Em All as we used to know it is dead. The catchphrase came back, but now it feels more like they're just accentuating how many monsters they are. Not "go get them all", but rather, "see how many there are? just fucking try".

The battle system became much more robust and claimed the spotlight. New types came in to balance the scene. Physical/Special split. New mechanics with hazards, weather, stage conditions, terrain. Double, Triple, Rotation (lol), Inverse (rip), Royale battles. To say the battle system isn't the forefront of the game, if not at least on par with the collection aspect, is disingenuous.

I can see why you're disappointed with later installments in various ways, but the short answer to why they make these design choices is because Pokemon simply isn't that kind of game anymore. Not in whole, at least. Is that a bad thing? Maybe. It's all subjective.

>>32110476
>playing pokemon alone
This is no longer an argument. It's now a pity party.
I mean I don't think I've ever met someone who was this much of a loser.

>>32110487
This is probably why I think Crystal was the last good Pokemon game. It was the last Pokemon game of the kind I wanted to play. People who get into Pokemon these days, they want to play the kind of Pokemon that's all about battling and doesn't have much to do with collecting anymore, so they look back on Crystal and don't think it was any good because that's not the kind of game they think of when they think Pokemon. It's not so much that Gens 1 and 2 were better or Gens 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were better, but rather, between those two groups, there's an impenetrable fence of mutual betterness, where either side you're standing on looks like the better side because you value it more for what it is.

>>32110522
Except that just isn't true. Do you know how many times I've been in a game store and see a kid ask for a gen 1 or 2 game? Pokemon games are still highly valued today, copies of gen 1 and 2 games go for as much as sun and moon honestly.

And honestly, if crystal was the last good one to you why stick around here? Is there really that much for ypu here when you limit yourself?

>>32110522
Yes, exactly. This is why /vp/ is always such a bipolar shitstorm when it comes to games. Everyone holds all the games to different standards, usually the standard of the game that gave them the best experience. Crystal seems to have given you the best experience, so you hold all the games up to Crystal, and since the more recent titles don't resemble Crystal at all, you see flaws where other people see completely valid and coherent gameplay. Likewise all the people here giving you (You)s are probably holding Crystal up to something else and see everything you hold up about the game as crippling flaws. There's really no way to compromise other than simply saying we look for different things in what we play.

Sometimes I wonder if some of the people who are shunned as genwunners are actually people like you who just liked the games for reasons GF don't seem to embrace anymore.

>>32110535
>Do you know how many times I've been in a game store and see a kid ask for a gen 1 or 2 game?

Not OP, but do you even know how many kids have never even HEARD of these games? I'm willing to wager significantly more than any number of kids you've seen.

>Pokemon games are still highly valued today, copies of gen 1 and 2 games go for as much as sun and moon

There's demand for them, sure, but you also have to consider the vast differences in supply. Sun and Moon are expensive because they're new retail copies. Gens 1 and 2 are expensive because there's so little stock that the people who actually want a copy have to fight with their wallets to get it.

>>32110535
>Except that just isn't true. Do you know how many times I've been in a game store and see a kid ask for a gen 1 or 2 game? Pokemon games are still highly valued today, copies of gen 1 and 2 games go for as much as sun and moon honestly.
Maybe it's not so much a generational thing. But I do nonetheless maintain that there is a fundamental qualitative difference or genre split between Gens 1 and 2 and Gens 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, and personally I prefer the prior genre--although I do now acknowledge this as purely a matter of personal preference.

>And honestly, if crystal was the last good one to you why stick around here? Is there really that much for ypu here when you limit yourself?
Actually I'm a newfag. I came here because I started playing Pokemon again the other day. Been playing a Crystal romhack that makes all 251 obtainable, with mythical Pokemon obtainable by story-related in-game sequences like ordinary legendaries. Even though I don't like most of the games, I DO like ALL of the mons, and this seems like a nice place to discuss them.

>>32107973
>Disclaimer: This is my opinion.
the fuck is this, your personal blog?

>>32110633
whatever it is, it's a lot fucking better than waifutheads

>>32110642
It really isn't.

>>32109120
Disclaimer: This is not a pasta. If you think this is pasta, you can't read. You don't need to reply, but these are my actual thoughts.
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

>>32110642
>waifutheads

/vp/ is illiterate. Completely and terribly illiterate. I don't mean spelling something incorrectly here or there, or not knowing a quadrisyllabic word. I mean that this board, centered around a game that touts itself as helping young children read, cannot even spell the names of the majority of the monsters that are its subject. People will spell names of Pokémon and characters incorrectly on a regular basis, and be unable to comprehend even slightly more advanced sentence structures. This board is filled with people whose intelligence, when measured on a metric of the ability to read and comprehend written language, would be far below the average in any first world country, and arguably 4chan as a whole. Why is this? Is the absurd nature of the Pokémon series affecting your ability to read? Perhaps because Pokémon attracts autists (colloquial jargon so adequate in this situation,) we have people who spend more time memorizing charts than how to properly read them. However, people with autism actually typically score higher on IQ tests and reading comprehension tests, so it doesn't make much sense to label that as the reason. I'm completely astounded by the collective lack of knowledge that this board displays.

>>32109983
Had my residence and email so edited it in snapseed quickly

>>32109120
Is about that fucking cringy disclaimer not your opinion idiot, you are entitled to have your autistic opinion but believing yourself an authority or some shit like that and not thinking people will think this a bait thread or good pasta is stupid

I'm gonna save a screenshot of that disclaimer for cringe threads.

>>32111788
I am gonna copy paste that disclaimer for future shitposting.

File: hqdefault (1).jpg (27KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x360px

>>32111739
the correct word is crungy