What went wrong?
No one understands to appreciate the humble anymore. People actually want those overdone Digimon designs instead of just animals.
>>32085216
Nothing, you're just exaggerating. We still get plenty of simple looking bugs.
If you compare something like this to Butterfree you know where I'm coming from.
>>32085236
this.
>>32085235
fuck off, lots of pokemon still look like animals, like komala
>>32085256
The fuck are you babbling about nigger?
How about make a non-retarded comparison, like Ribombee.
>>32085256
Still not really over-designed. The design has some unnecessary features but it'd be boring without them.
>If I cherry pick it will show people im right!
I can cherry pick too!
>>32085295
next-gen ready
>>32085345
you really can't
>>32085235
Yeah fuck new pokemon, none are animals.
>>32085373
What actual Pokemon is that supposed to parody you blind fuck? Certainly not Golisopod.
>Another "People who have absolutely no experience in character design or marketing complain about a successful franchise" thread
>tfw no one on /vp/ takes me seriously when I say I prefer gen 1's designs because of faggots like OP
>>32085216
Look at this edgy, overdesigned nu-gen bug. Fucking horrifying.
>comparing butterfree to deoxys
Cartoon butterflies are simple and isopods are detailed, that's why Butterfree and Golisopod look like the way they do. You could do the same with, say, Cutiefly and Scyther: Bee flies are simples and mantids are detailed, therefore Cutiefly is simple and Scyther is detailed.
>>32085256
Yeah, just look at this overdesigned piece of shit
>>32085420
>neo-nostalgia
>retard genwunner trying to recycle things yelled at him unsuccessfully
>>32085256
Hey pal, did you just blow in from stupid town?
>>32085445
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
>>32085453
out of arguments already?
>>32085460
I never made an argument, I asked a question and received a tantrum. So I suppose all my theories are solved.
>>32085468
>1489682759861.png
name it file.png next time
>>32085473
>tantrum
Do you even know what this word means or are you intentionally using it incorrectly?
>>32085473
>I suppose all my theories are solved.
Post them. All of them. Post all proofs and experiments you conduct to prove your "theories".
>>32085520
Why are you so angry?
>>32085533
Make sure to give credit to me when you post this epic troll on r/4chan.
See you in three days, OP.
>>32085533
>>32085473
>question
>Why are newgenners so defensive of modern designs? Is this neo-nostalgia?
You asked a leading question filled with shitflinging buzzwords. That's not an inquiry, that's you indirectly calling people defensive in a pathetic attempt at damage control.
Your thread is shit. Learn to argue.
>>32085557
You're acting way too toxic, not even capable of conversation.
>>32085581
>You're acting way too toxic, not even capable of conversation.
>>32085533
>Why are you so angry?
>>32085473
>I asked a question and received a tantrum.
>>32085580
This isn't my thread, I just got here.
If I worded myself poorly before then I apologize, but I'm genuinely looking for an answer because this interests me.
It seems as if we've crossed the threshold where Genwunners were once constantly flagged as biased and unreasonable, but now it seems the same can be said for newgen apologists.
>>32085593
It's not healthy to see a fight where there isn't one.
>>32085609
Point me to the biased and unreasonable "newgenner" arguments in this thread.
>>32085581
>too toxic
>genwunners are still autistic
>>32085625
For gods sake, that's not what I'm suggesting at all.
I give up, consider this 'internet fight' your victory.
>>32085477
made improvements
>>32085664
>make baseless claim via loaded question
>throw tantrum when asked for evidence
classic
Honestly I don't understand the appeal of kanto designs, I don't get the hype. The only one I _like_ is Sandslash, and even then it's not in my top 10. After having played Red I didn't think I'd ever get into pokemon. There are some bad new pokemon designs, I agree, but there are many more designs that are appealing to say the least, much more than kanto.
>>32085772
okay
>>32085779
That's it? No rebuttal? No asking me to post my top 10 so you can shit all over it? What happened to /vp/?
>>32085785
rebuttal to what? you said I like this and not that. not sure what that has to do with OP's fallacious comparisons.
time moves forwards instead of the universe forever existing in a fixed moment and i am fucking pissed about it
>>32085814
>>32085703
Chicken-chan is dank!
>>32085785
post your top 10 so I can shit all over it
as far as i'm concerned there are only 3 continents
the ones they added later are gimmicky and overpowered
>>32085826
How is she so perfect?
>>32085845
>yfw you're actually right
>>32085845
Is Antarctica considered the new world?
>>32085958
nobody gives a shit about that worthless expansion
there is basically no content
if you actually spent time and money on that shit for some new animal npcs and costumes then you are a moron