Alright, I just need to say something real quick:
There's a difference between Owlfags and people who just like Decidueye. Owlfags insult anyone whom doesn'tit, want to fuckit, and just generally give people whom just like decidueye a bad name. Any thread that's just a decidueye thread suddenly becomes an owlfags thread.
So, saying this, can we please just have a nice Decidueye thread? No owlfagging? Just celebrating a cool mon? Other owls welcome too.
I want to marry her
>>32052185
We just had a thread less than 2 days ago
>>32052185
>Owlfags insult anyone whom doesn't it
those bastards
>>32052200
Literally JUST SAID. NO. FUCKING. OWLFAGGING.
LEEEEEEAVE
>>32052185
>>32052185
>Other owls welcome too
Rowlet et al. isn't really my thing, but I do like Hoothoot. Noctowl too, but to a lesser degree than its pre-evolution.
>>32052277
Too bad there aren't a lot of art of Hoothoot by itself; most of what I have is with a group of other 'mons.
>Expecting a spotless clean thread with no hostility and/or forgery of some kind in /vp/ by posting a warning
I already learned that the hard way, anon, it's no use. That doesn't mean I don't want this to become a good thread, because I want it to. But this place is dumb as fuck and people really do just want to fuck with other people just for fun.
owlfags are also owl fags because the only reason they picked it is for the edgy hood.
Honestly I kind of feel bad for you owlbros. I don't mean this in a condescending way of course by which I mean the reason I feel sorry for you guys is because of the constant stream of true owlfags on this board, building Decidueye as some sort of god compared to the other two when its stats sadly don't reflect that.
I have nothing but respect for you owlbros on this board, but nothing but contempt for owlfags.
>>32052388
>building Decidueye as some sort of god compared to the other two when its stats sadly don't reflect that.
>implying stats matter instead of design