Pokemon and Sexuality

>>31983182
DON'T MAKE ME COME THROUGH THIS SCREEN AND PIMPSMACK YOU LIKE A BITCH, OP.
I'LL FUCKING DO IT!

>firsty

/vp/ is illiterate. Completely and terribly illiterate. I don't mean spelling something incorrectly here or there, or not knowing a quadrisyllabic word. I mean that this board, centered around a game that touts itself as helping young children read, cannot even spell the names of the majority of the monsters that are its subject. People will spell names of Pokémon and characters incorrectly on a regular basis, and be unable to comprehend even slightly more advanced sentence structures. This board is filled with people whose intelligence, when measured on a metric of the ability to read and comprehend written language, would be far below the average in any first world country, and arguably 4chan as a whole. Why is this? Is the absurd nature of the Pokémon series affecting your ability to read? Perhaps because Pokémon attracts autists (colloquial jargon so adequate in this situation,) we have people who spend more time memorizing charts than how to properly read them. However, people with autism actually typically score higher on IQ tests and reading comprehension tests, so it doesn't make much sense to label that as the reason. I'm completely astounded by the collective lack of knowledge that this board displays.

>>31983226
You confused colloquial autism with the scientific spectrum. Actual autists do score higher in IQ tests, but the way 4chan and other boards use "autism" has nothing to do with the scientific diagnosis.

>>31983182
>It would not be the same as you trying to have sex with her dog.

This doesn't fit with the syntax of the rest of your post, OP. Is this a freudian slip? Who does this hypothetical dog belong to?

OP, did you have sex with someone's dog? Did you call it Growlith? Furfrou?

WHAT DID YOU DO TO THE DOG, OP?

>>31983269
A dog has no idea what you are trying to do to it while a Pokemon seems to have more idea of what is going on.

>>31983182
considering dolphins rape people on a monthly basis, I imagine many pokemon (specially human egg group ones) would sometimes engage with humans.

However, I find the concept of egg groups more interesting. Is it defined by their reproductive system? is this why it's called "human-like"? but then how can some things be in a "mineral" egg group, literal rocks producing offspring, or sometimes things like computers generating eggs with dittos. Furthermore, do these differences fully prohibit intercourse or only limit them to not being able to have offspring? could an arcanine fuck a gliscor, or would their system be so different they literally wouldn't be able to do this? We need to know more.

>>31983182
>Can we be sure the pokemon can consent?
>Can we be sure the pokmeon doesn't suffer?
Same questions when it comes to bestiality OP.
If yes in both case then who care? if no in either case then no.

>let's have an intelligent discussion about sexuality of fictional creatures in a children's game

Let's not.

>>31983226
Oh hey, this pasta again.

>>31983290
Don't evade the question, dog fucker. You said "her dog" not "a dog." Whose dog did you have sex with, OP?

>>31983304
That is interesting. We don't know what type of sexual organs Pokemon have either. However, since they categorized by male and female, we can assume they have penises and vaginas.

>>31983314
grow up.

>>31983314
You're the one in a board filled with grown men talking about said children's videogame, either spending hundreds of hours on it, bitching about the features or shitposting about their FoTM waifu

>>31983326
Oh wow, I didn't even notice. I probably wasn't paying attention. As stated here: >>31983226

File: BLACKED.jpg (50KB, 400x444px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 400x444px

Semi-intelligent post coming through

I think there would be Pokemon/human sexual relations, but with obvious limitations.

First physical, meaning most Ghost types would be off the list.
Legendaries would also probably be off the list, due to them being rare. Than there's anatomical limitations. Pokémon which are made of inorganic material such as Klink, Magnemite, Garbodor and Metang to name a few, I would imagine would be difficult to derive some sort of sexual pleasure from since there literally just hunks of metal and or literal garbage.

There's also "mental" limitations. Basically is the mostly Pokémon instinct driven, or is it more "conscious"? Pokémon like Rhydon, Rhyhorn, Garchomp, Druddigon, Tyranitar, Nidoking/queen, Kommo-o line, most bug type Pokemon, and Tentacruel are Pokémon I would consider to be more "instinct" driven rather than having a definite conscience to them.

Then there's social limitations. Like which Pokémon would it be socially acceptable to have sexual relations with? Than that limits your choices of Pokémon to have sex with at the expense of social relations.

And there is where I think you would your definitive answer. Yes, but it would only be with Pokémon who society considers traits that are "human."


I hate to sound like a shill NEET, but yes, that would include most if not all waifus like Gardevoir, Braixen, Roserade, Tsareena, Medicham, Primarina, etc. It would also include Pokémon like the Hitmons, Jynx, Electabuzz line, Machamp line, Lucario, Infernape, Bisharp, etc.

>>31983350
Would you only have sex with fully evolved Pokemon? Would having sex with pre-evolutions be considered pedophilia?

>>31983378
Would a 30 year old Braixen be sexually mature? I would imagine so.

>>31983350
http://pastebin.com/n4DYBsWP

File: do you really expect me to read.jpg (404KB, 544x750px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 544x750px

>>31983226

>>31983411
>201,574 keyhits with space
fucking lol

>>31983304
the fuck man? This is a kid's game.

>>31983314
Let's never

>>31983443
So? Elm was studying this very topic

>>31983411
My post was coming more from the mindset of "If you were to drop Pokémon universe into a real world setting."

But that thing is way too long to read, but from what I read it sounds like more of a fanfic and headcannon rather than an actual hypothesis.

>>31983457
>>31983443

Why is /vp/ so afraid of sexuality?

>>31983411
what the hell is this

File: everything wrong with MLP.png (245KB, 850x800px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 850x800px

>>31983314
>>31983457

/mlp/ here, its perfectly normal to enjoy excessive amounts of visual and written pornography of child media and discuss it in public

>>31983350
>Infernape
gimme the chimp titties

File: Hark.png (229KB, 1051x1393px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1051x1393px

>>31983182
Ignoring any backwards justification for your waifu of choice, and ignoring my bitter, frothing hatred for you and your kind:

>Intelligence
This is the most difficult. All Pokemon are frequently portrayed all over the spectrum of awareness, intelligence, wisdom, and the like, very literally varying from "technically it has a brain" to veritable godlike minds. This is not something you can pin down without bringing in bias, and makes *any* given Pokemon a potential failure or pass: For example, Psychic powers do not equal intelligence, let alone awareness, and being a bug does not equal being a robot or childlike.

>Communication
This is the easiest, since Pokemon are often portrayed as having their own language that is somehow shared among them, and can understand human speech. Pokemon have and do get demonstrated needing to be taught commands and words for simple things like battle, though, much like how real world animals get trained, and this ties into the Int issue.

>Sexual Maturity
Evolution is often as tied with getting stronger as it is with age, which makes this more difficult than it needs to be. You're generally going to want to avoid NFEs, and sexual maturity will probably involve years worth of time depending on the Pokemon, as well as evolution.

>Sexual Match
This is the most restrictive thing, that is to say Egg Groups. Even if all the other stars align, you can't do much about it being a chandelier. The Human-Like Egg Group should be fine, and some of the others are questionable, but the Grass, Mineral, Amorphous, and Undiscovered Egg Groups would, flatly, not work. Though, Undiscovered is pending individual discoveries.

File: 1484461527959.png (324KB, 1202x892px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1202x892px

>>31983585
This has got to be the most thought out post in this thread. Nice.

File: Crying.jpg (55KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 645x773px

>>31983585
>You and your magemite will never make small magnet babies

File: 1488117248879.png (100KB, 297x299px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 297x299px

>>31983585
I have to say this but, Sexual march was to be like with Human-like egg groups and other shit that has been with.

>自己

>>31983585
>Intelligence
I think this can relate back to my previous post. Would you consider the Pokémon to be more instinct driven (animalistic) or does it have conscienceness similar to that of humans?
There are also Pokémon who van learn to speak human language. Look at Mewtwo, Meowth, hell even mons like Meloetta can easily understand complex human creations like music. I would argue Primarina too, since it's primary characteristic is singing (producing musical notes), and singing for the most part is a human trait because singing is also derives from a culture. Which is also uniquely human.

>Sexual Maturity
This where I'm at a slight disagreement. I don't think sexual maturity is anyway connected to evolution for the most part. Yeah, there are baby Pokémon who can obviously not breed, but what about Pokémon like Barixen, Kirlia, etc? It's been proven Pokémon who aren't fully evolved can reproduce just fine. I think sexual maturity would be linked to the Pokemons age. And yes, I would think 25 year old Machoke and Kirlia do exist.

>Sexual Match
I'm at a slight disagreement here too. I think we can both agree Pokémon who made of inorganic material are off the table. I think Pokémon in the Field, Dragon and Monster wouldn't work either, because those are Pokémon I would consider to more animalistic than most. But why disregard those egg groups? Specifically Grass. Yeah sure you can't reproduce with them, but what's stopping you from having sex with something from that egg group?

For example, I cant reproduce with a man, but that doesn't mean I can't have sex with that man.

And there is where I think, it pretty much depends on the species and whether or not how society views that particular species. If society deans it okay to have sex with a Gardevoir, than despite it's egg group, what's really stopping you from having sex with it?

>>31983753
What the fuck did I just read? is this english?

>>31983786
Yes, why did you ask?

>>31983789
Reads like someone having a stroke

>>31983786
I am pretty sure this is chinese.
Ziji means "self"

>>31983336
>grow up.
says the faggot having a pretend discussion about sexuality in a children's game. you man children are so embarrassing

>>31983314
Pokémon is not a kid game.
It's rated E for everyone.

File: Nothing happened.png (6KB, 256x223px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 256x223px

>>31983182
How about we start with this?

>>31983182
I WANT TO FUCK TRUBBISH

>>31983835
Because the npc is speaking to a kid who probably thinks a poke stork brought him to his parents, they're not going to go into detail about pokefuckig

The only two things that matter are consent and the age of consent. If it's sexually mature and can effectively let you know that it wants your dick, you can give it the dick. Pokémon have shown that even in the wild they share an improvised language and are capable of forming tribal societies, and can recognize and respond to complex human emotions and actions which requires empathy. It's not a stretch to say that they'd respond positively to your degenerate advances, because degeneracy tends to scale with intelligence (see dolphins and chimps)

>>31983935
But why? They clearly bring up the concept of laying eggs. We know Pokemon eggs are a thing. Even kids know what an egg is. What's the point of denying that, especially after bringing it up herself?

Humans can impregnate, or be impregnated, by all pokemon. Similar to ditto.

>>31983336
>we can assume they have penises and vaginas

We can't even assume that. For all we know, males and females could release gametes into the air that combine and form the egg. Which would explain how they literally appeared out of nowhere.

>>31983783
I have no idea which is your previous post, but I would not generalise any species of Pokemon for the reasons I stated. Singing is not human culture specific by any stretch either, birds for example, whales for another.

I used words like 'generally' because while I'll adhere to what I said, I acknowledge fringe cases like older NFEs as you suggest. However, since the games ignore timeframes in favor of gameplay, that's extent of my concession.

In regards to matches, Grass was discarded because plants reproduce with spores and shit that I know just enough about to know that they're not something human parts use. I also never said you couldn't do sexual acts with [anything], you just shouldn't be expecting to be able to stick your dick in them, which is the most common definition of having sex.

>If society deans it okay to have sex with a Gardevoir, than despite it's egg group, what's really stopping you from having sex with it?
Nothing, because the Egg Group is the issue. Gardevoir has the parts to have sex with a chandelier, which me and you, presumably, don't.

>>31983935
Except thats invalid after gen 4 since the protags in gen 5 and 6 are all 15 or older

>>31984247
that pic is from gen 4, lucas and dawn are like 12

>>31983182
"It unleashes psychokinetic energy at full power when protecting a Trainer it has bonded closely with." This is the heart gold and soul silver dex text for Gardevoir. I believe it proves Gardevoir is the test case for OP's questions. As seen in the text, it only unleases it's full power for a trainer it has closely bonded with. The best question would be "Does closely bonded with mean romanticly bonded with?"

File: tumblr_lwvtxjZtuJ1r0dx95o1_1280.png (280KB, 600x540px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 600x540px

>>31984414
You can forge a close bond with someone without being romantically intimate.

>>31984545
>frienzoned

File: 1457263798363.png (632KB, 700x2264px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 700x2264px

>>31984575
That brings up another question. If a trainer isn't attracted to their pokemon but the pokemon is attracted to them, what's to stop them from forcing themselves on them?

>>31984599
literally nothing but moral boundaries. We're talking about being literally born being able to spew fire, call thunder and break rocks, if they want you they'll have you.

File: 1390299301088.png (460KB, 342x768px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 342x768px

>>31984599

>>31984599
this is my fantasy, to be dominated by my beloved Gardevoir I raised for years.

>>31984545
Name how many times it has happened without romance being the original catalyst.

File: 76f671166dcf1eebff627d8980c95425.png (236KB, 500x391px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 500x391px

>>31984624
That's a scary thought.

>>31984664
You've never had a best friend or something?

File: ththanks.jpg (3KB, 100x120px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 100x120px

>>31984698

>>31984698
You tell me how many BFFs you would be willing to put your life and future on the line for.

>>31984888
Two of them. I've known them for more than a decade each.

>>31984888
I've got one. I've known this person my whole life.

>>31983350
>First physical, meaning most Ghost types would be off the list.
It's like this poster doesn't want to get oral from a ghost. Lick is a Ghost-type move for a reason, Anon!

>>31984888
One close friend of mine, known him for almost 2 decades now.
And if we're going that route, there's also family.

>>31985020
gh-ost blowjob! woowoo woowooowoo!

File: vHMP81h[1].jpg (539KB, 750x833px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 750x833px

>>31983350
When I saw this, my first instinct was to believe Garde was the dude and 'Sharp was the chick. This went on for several seconds until I regained sanity.

What is wrong with me? What has become of me?

File: 1481157933457.gif (853KB, 436x504px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 436x504px

>>31985116
They're both girls

>>31984906
>>31985001
I think you two really might have secret crushes on your bffs.

>>31985045
You are at least brave enough to consider there might be something between you and your BFF if you think that strongly for them anon, kudos. Family might also be a contributing factor, but that would again put love on the table. My point is a simple one, to go that all out, there has to be a greater potential then loyalty or even fellowship. Love at some point has to be the motivation.

File: Egg.png (162KB, 478x360px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 478x360px

>>31983835

File: Eggs.png (110KB, 480x363px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 480x363px

>>31983835
...

>>31985215
Then you think wrong.

>>31985332
Or you think wrong, both are equally likely.

>>31983585
New anon here, thought I'd add to the discussion.
First of all, we need to specify wether "having sex with" means reproducing, penetrating (or being entered in the case of female trainers) or, by the loosest sense, doing anything which could give any of the participants sexual pleasure. I personally like to go with the latter.

>Intelligence
As this anon said, it's difficult. All pokémon are capable of understanding commands, which puts them on par with dogs at least. We know of specific pokémon being more intelligent, such as Oranguru which teach new skills not only to their own kind, but to other pokémon.
It's hard to nail down, unless the pokémon is either fully capable of human speech and its comprehension, or has the ability to use telepathy. Oh and all of this isn't even taking the Mystery Dungeon series into consideration where every pokémon is just a person intelligence wise, no exceptions.

>Communication
Some pokémon can talk, though we don't know wether it's parroting speech or if they have an understanding of human languages. Telepathy should once again solve this, so just ask your friendly neighbourhood psychic type.

>Sexual maturity
Can it breed? Yes? It's biologically sexually mature. Though, to me, it's more important that the pokémon is mentally mature enough for sexual acts. Human 15 year olds are sexually mature, but I wouldn't stick my dick anywhere near those emotional card houses.

>Sexual match
I'm guessing humans are part of the humanlike egg group, hence why it is named as such.

Bumping for interest

>>31984690
that's a hot thought

>>31985777
Yeah, I defined sex as some form of mutual sexual organ use as they're designed for. There's much less difficulty for anything to do other sexual acts, though there's still general practicality limitations.

I agree in that the mental side of sexual maturity is very important, and it is why I wasn't happy to freely concede NFE pokemon like Braixen and Kirlia, even if they can breed in the games.

>>31985409
It's more likely for the person in the situation to have a better grasp of it than an armchair psychologist anon.

File: 1480732552827.jpg (100KB, 1200x1090px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1200x1090px

>>31988606
It's legitimately terrifying.

>>31983339
>grown men
Funny meme

>>31988980
I want gardevoir to ballbust me

I wonder what fucking Banette feels like. I wonder if one can even mate with Banette. It'd be pretty plush right, considering it's a possessed doll?

>>31989479
Like fucking a doll.

>>31983378
if it evolves without a stone its prevos are not for fug

>>31983350
I would be ok with that. Humanoid pokemons are superior anyway.

>>31983182
You know, I always wondered how the human In the mystery dungeon world would act to pokesex. Since he's basically stuck in that world I doubt he's going to get a human that's will be into pokemons.

File: 41b5511d40141d1e556d5973f74bb5e3.jpg (10KB, 325x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 325x183px

>>31983304
> I imagine many pokemon (specially human egg group ones) would sometimes engage with humans.

>>31988755
I don't think evolution really plays a role. You can prevent evolution or accelerate it in extreme ways without side effects like rare candy a newborn pokemon and it will act just like any other fully evolved pokemon.

>>31990130
The games barely acknowledge the concept of time, and we have no way in game to interact with the Pokemon beyond some excessively basic mechanics. Saying the Pokemon acts the exact same as other Pokemon of it's stage is the same as judging all soldiers the same after going through the army's statistical records. Moreover, when evolution does come up in the story or other media, it is often treated akin to maturity.

File: shiggy diggy.png (244KB, 568x559px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 568x559px

>>31983182
>What do you think?
Do you remember Bayleef in the anime? Or more recently Mareanie and James?
Well then

>>31990688
doesn't mareanie think James is a mareanie too? I don't watch the anime but from the gifs and webms uploaded here it seemed so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8jgEm3fIQk

>>31983182
Well... the 1 thing is fact about pokemon being more inteligent than animals. Some of them can communicate with human without problems.

Also we have proofs that people and pokemon sometimes are getting married.

So if pokemon were real some people will try to have sex with their pokemon, especially lonely ones. Probably only these with obwious humanoid apperance (like gardevoirs, machokes, gallades etc.) of course there will be bed snug only species because of weird anatomy but still having attractive apperance ( lilligant, tapu lele etc.). Sex with other polemon will be more rare because only miniorities would fuck vaporeon and even less will try to fuck a muk.

File: Sexy muk.jpg (54KB, 400x475px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 400x475px

>>31990739
FUCK A MUK!
FUCK A MUK!

File: 1488710834518.png (349KB, 497x459px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 497x459px

>>31990820

>>31983336
there are male and female organisms that don't have penises and vaginas. do you even biology?

They fucking turn all white and glowing and shit and change forms, which requires impossible energy and shit. Surely they just are compatible and then some magic glowing egg bullshit happens.

>>31983493
>afraid
more like disgusted. afraid is not equal to disgusted. For example most people are afraid of heights, but are not disgusted by heights; most normal people would be disgusted by smelly diapers but are not afraid of them.
>sexuality
not sexuality per se, but a subset of sexuality, which is interspecies sexuality. Ooh, which by the way is taboo in almost all civilized cultures.

>>31990867
>Ooh

>>31990874
>OOH
>OH FLAREON

>>31990867
It's only taboo because animals can't consent.
Pokemon can.

>>31983585
I like this post overall desu
>Pokemon have and do get demonstrated needing to be taught commands and words for simple things like battle, though, much like how real world animals get trained, and this ties into the Int issue.
Some of this you could just attribute to trying to work in the game limitations though, it's not always consistent that way.

>>31983182
>Let's have an intelligent discussion about Pokemon and their sexuality.
Impossible.

Firsty, we know Pokemon are sexual beings. >They breed and have children like most creatures.
For all we know the stork brings them. And they ALL lay eggs if they do. The same exact identical egg.
>They also seem to have their own consciousness and could consent to humans who want to have sex with them. It would not be the same as you trying to have sex with her dog. So, you would not be taking advantage of a consenting pokemon.
No. To all of this. They do nothing but fight for survival, they are not anywhere near sentient level intelligence.
>Also, it was stated in the japanese gen 4 games that humans and pokemon were together at some point in time.
It says they were indistinguishable. That could mean everything from evolution to common ancestor
>What do you think? If Pokemon were real, would we be able to have sex with them or would it strictly only be Pokemon on Pokemon?
No, because I can not fuck a dog, and I can not fuck a horse.

>>31991049
How? They don't speak any language and are not sentient

>>31983304
Yes, and we don't fuck dolphins, now do we? Pokemon are no more intelligent then Dolphins or dogs, so no you can't fuck them

>>31991321
They're pretty clearly demonstrated to be able to communicate with each other using some kind of language and understand Humans as well in official media, they're also usually human-level in their ability to express emotions.

I don't think I'd ever be in favor of IRL dogfucking for reasons beyond the basic harkness test shit but I still won't deny that they aren't like regular animals and are usually rendered as at the very least children in animalistic bodies.

>>31991316
>They do nothing but fight for survival, they are not anywhere near sentient level intelligence

sounds bullshit.
who is TR's Meowth?
who is Wobbuffet (saw it film with a camera or drive a vehicle before) and pretty much any other psychic type?
what are pokemon who show any sort of empathy towards other mons and humans too?

>>31991321
Says you, it's been clearly stablishef by games and the anime that they understand human speech at a basic level and can do things as simple as nod or shake their heads

>>31991316
>No. To all of this. They do nothing but fight for survival, they are not anywhere near sentient level intelligence.
There's several Pokemon that actively try to help people by making them happier, sharing things with other Pokemon also only for happyness, Pokemon capable of telepathy, Pokemon that have their own language, and even Pokemon that purposely do things that make them less likely to survive, like mimikyu hiding its terrifying true form which could easily scare off all other mons in favor of a Pikachu cloth (also, how many animals can sow clothing again?).

If fucking their own survival for things like friendship, empathy, a desire for love and companionship from a different species and intelligent symbiosis isn't enough to make you realize their not just animals, you are biased as fuck

>>31991327
Pokemon are smarter than dolphins though. And that wasn't even the point I was trying to make. It was about how Pokemon themselves would try sometimes to fuck people.

>>31984083
We do know some of them have mammalian organs what with the milk drink move.

I FIRMLY believe that pokemon fans have a subgroup of a subgroup that will become increasingly dangerous to both children and animals and one will breach the news and generate a label for all of us with their lack of self control

File: 1381211987184.jpg (370KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1200x800px

>>31983304
What does dolphin raep feel like?

>>31991953
You're retarded beyond belief if you genuinely believe that and know nothing about human psychology and the way people feel about fetishes.

>>31991953
You do realize you can say that about literally any group of people ever, right? Of course one guy out there is a complete retard, sexual deviant and plays Pokemon, but you can find those playing all sorts of games and finding weird stuff in those kinky.

My point is you're exaggerating. Saying one guy will make everybody think Pokemon fans are deranged is not only such a broad statement you can swap Pokemon for almost any other game and still be right, but is also incredibly misguided by assuming one bad case will make everyone generalize so much.

>>31992046
>>31992014
You're both dumb
I clearly articulated that people will negatively stereotype pokemon fans based on an inevitable group of people's actions, not that the stereotype is true.

Look at WOW or any other game slapped with brief periods of insulting stereotypes. Dare I bring up minecraft?

>>31992046
I take that back you're not dumb

>>31991953
Fucking pedos. How could anyone get off to the idea of removing a little girl's clothes and licking her tiny body all over, nibbling her neck and kissing her adorable little nipples? Only a heartless monster would think about her cute girlish mouth and tongue wrapped around a thick cock slick with her saliva, pumping in and out of her mouth until it erupts, the cum more than her little throat can swallow.
The idea of thick viscous semen overflowing, dribbling down her chin over her flat chest, her tiny hands scooping it all up and watching her suck it off her fingertips is just horrible. You're all a bunch of sick perverts, thinking of spreading her smooth slender thighs, cock poised at the entrance to her pure, tight, virginal pussy, and thrusting in deep as a whimper escapes her lips which are slippery with cum, while her small body shudders from having her cherry taken in one quick stroke.
I am disgusted at how you'd get even more excited as you lean over her, listening to her quickening breath, her girlish moans and gasps while you hasten your strokes, her sweet pants warm and moist on your face and her flat chest, shiny with a sheen of fresh sweat, rising and falling rapidly to meet yours.
It is truly nasty how you'd run your hands all over her tiny body while you violate her, feeling her nipples hardening against your tongue as you lick her chest, her neck and her armpits, savoring the scent of her skin and sweat while she trembles from the stimulation and as she reaches her climax, hearing her cry out softly as she has her first orgasm while that cock is buried impossibly deep inside her, pulsing violently as an intense amount of hot cum spurts forth and floods through her freshly-deflowered pussy for the first time, filling her womb only to spill out of her with a sickening squelch. And as you lie atop her flushed body, she sighs breathlessly and her fingers dig into your back as she feels your cock hardening inside her again.

File: IMG_1585.gif (897KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 800x430px

>>31992196

>>31988755
Sure, like lying to one's self has never occured. Why do we need psychologists at all? I mean we are so honest with ourselves all the time.

>>31992919
>like being stupid as shit has never occurred

What's more likely, that you can accurately ascertain multiple people's psyche from a sliver of information, or that you're 6 foot tall and 8 foot up yourself?

>>31984888

John 15:13 (KJV) "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends."

>>31992979
Wow, getting that butthurt over being called out on something obvious. I stand by my original statement. It isn't at all unnatural for such things to occur in human relationships. The norm though is that there are things that stop us from acting on said feelings. It is the reason I congradulated the one anon for having the courage to be honest enough with themselves to even think of their relationship with their BFF going in that direction. I will state it again, something more is needed to put your life and future on the line for someone else.

That said, back to topic of thread. Gardevoir could have such feelings. I perpose she is the test case. Since she could be, others could follow suit.

>>31983226
Wow, we skipped straight over the straw man and went straight to the personal attacks. I'm impressed.

My headcanon is that humans are the only organisms who are part of the animal kingdom in the Pokémon world. The Pokémon are part of the Pokémon kingdom, and what makes a lifeform a Pokémon is that they are partly made of magic and reproduce by magic. No one has seen a Pokémon lay an egg because the egg was never laid via a birth canal. The two Pokémon exchanged tbeir genetic material by magic and converted magic to matter (like e=mc squared) to create the egg. Pokémon have no vagina, womb, penis or uterus (but they may have an urethra and anus) so it's impossible to have "sex" with them, though I suppose psychic types could have "mental sex" with anything they could connect with.

>>31983182
This topic is cringe as fuck. I fap to Pokemon now and then when the mood strikes me, but trying to have an "intelligent" discussion about it is maximum autism.

Neck yourself.

>>31993406
>humans are the only organisms who are part of the animal kingdom in the Pokémon world
what about chickens and indian elephants?

File: 1470403499899.png (23KB, 453x268px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 453x268px

>>31993414
>he faps to fictional monsters from a 20 year-old E rated videogame
>Thinks he has the right to tell anybody to do anything, let alone necking themselves
Go back to furaffinity Mr. Professional degenerate.

>>31993420

They're memes.

>>31993497
You can't just call things that upset you memes
At least chickens are real, since they're straight up mentioned by Hau, even if the elephants are dex-only and people sperg out when the damn thing is even mentioned

File: 1471132753060.png (300KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 480x640px

>>31993502
>tfw when you fuck up your post twice
just fuck my shit up

>>31993471
You get the point anyways

>>31991372
>ashnime
Opinion discarded.

>>31993502

Alright then, the only animal kingdom organisms are humans, chickens and Indian Elephants.

>>31993510
much better

>>31993508
the anime is still a source of information
Saying that isn't canon is as dumb as saying the games aren't canon.

File: projecting.jpg (95KB, 486x330px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 486x330px

>>31993340
>Wow, getting that butthurt

I'd continue to point out how silly you are, but you felt the need to get the last word in and shut down, which is fine.

>>31993406
The official Pocket Monsters manga showed that Pokemon do have penises.

>>31993780
[citation needed]

>>31993414
Are you a child?

File: d04d0435d80b7135e4882f165310ff739df3b68b_hq.jpg (35KB, 375x254px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 375x254px

>>31993808

File: kosaku2.jpg (84KB, 387x680px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 387x680px

>>31993808

File: 1470411422547.png (224KB, 646x515px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 646x515px

>>31993847
>>31993867
o-oh....

>>31993867

That manga was made super early in the franchise and is filled with weird stuff anyway.

>>31990477
parasect.

File: old-treecko-194045-202297.jpg (123KB, 655x368px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 655x368px

>>31990477
Elderly and unevolved

>>31983182
>A discussion about Pokemon and sexuality
>but most specifically a Pokemon and human sex discussion
Fucking pokefetishists trying to pass their degeneracy as something normal. Kill yourselves.

>>31994087
Ok pedo.

>>31994122
>he is a degenerate so he thinks everyone has a different degenerate fetish
Literally another reason for you to commit suicide. Right fucking now.

>>31994141
I can tell you are sexually frustrated

>>31994141
>he's this triggered by degeneracy on 4chan
Reddit's that way, my man. Come back when you're ready.

>>31994087
>>31994141
Nigga you are edgy as fuck.

File: 1485487810936.jpg (294KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 768x768px

>>31991968
>rebuilds

>>31993867

Plus for all we know that penis could be used for urinating only.

>>31983585
>Sexual Maturity
this is a tricky one, because is show that pokemons can (and some do) stay in it's first evos and reproduce/die without evolve, the only exceptions are the baby pokemons like pichu

>>31993757
Funny comment, you even top it off with the perfect picture. Which side are you on by the by? Do you think pokemon can give consent? Really doesn't matter who gets the last word as others invariably comment after us until the topic rolls off the board.

>>31997777
You need to die for stealing quads from /vpmd/

>>31997777
I wanted those quads.

>>31983411
I liked the Klefki one.

>>31983411
That's pretty good

>>31994900
They have balls too. Their anatomy is too similar to mammals.

As seen here >>31994043
aside from baby forms age have nothing to do with being a high level or fully evolved. I would compare it to karate belts. You would expect the older people to hold higher ranks with the old men to be the master and the young boy the white belt rookie but it is entirely possible for an old man to be a white belt and a young boy a black belt.

This thread turned out much better than I honestly expected

>>31989514
>implying that not everybody is Rayquaza's fucktoy

>>31999246

I can't believe I missed his balls.

>>31993508
>No counter argument
>Bails out
How like a fuccboi

File: c40ad3ad61db8a477edc093d9b5ee6da1381722147_full.png (356KB, 640x497px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 640x497px

>>32001505
How could you have missed these?