Find a flaw
anatomy
>>31939018
Clothing is probably uncomfortable af
Complete bastardizations of design
>>31939018
Haven't got their hands yet
>>31939018
>draw a naked girl
>color some parts to look like clothes
OI, JUST FUCKIN MAKE EM NAKED IF UR THIS SHIT GOD DAMN.
They are not naked
>>31939018
my dick isnt sandwiched between them
>>31939018
this is so fucking disgusting that I don't even know where to start
>>31939018
>rosa
>clothes are basically just paint on their bare skin
>>31939018
I like the artist and the drawing but why are the clothes so tight? They'd be impossible to remove for a bath or to take a shit.
Good art, poor logic.
jesus this is ugly
If we look at other Rosas by the same artist, we can see that her ass is gradually eating her skirt.
They are teen and they aren't boobs monsters no matter how much you faggots can't accept it
>>31939185
>>31939018
You didn't post the official arts.
The girls themselves are the two best female protagonists, so no flaws there.
>>31939258
>The girls themselves are the two best female protagonists, so no flaws there.
This I agree with.
>>31939225
>>31939018
Everything about the pic is so wrong.
>>31939018
their clothes look dont even look like clothes.
its just body paint
>>31939018
Those tits are drawn so, so small.
>>31939018
only flaw is not posting the artist
>>31939018
Exaggerated proportions: The Image
Also, there's an illegal alien in the pic.
>Complaining about anatomy on a pokémon board
As if the anatomy mattered to any of them
>>31939018
Those are some badly draw boobs.
>>31939018
There's so many flaws that I don't know where to begin.
>>31939018
they're not farting
>>31939018
Rosa (the worst designed female protag) is present.
>>31940027
>That pic
kek
Find a flaw
>>31940180
>"BRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP"
>>31939018
May's tits appear sentient.
The perspective is terrible around Rosa's chest.
>>31939018
Not diapered
>>31939018
>>31939185
artist??
>There are people on this very planet who value more on following stupid rules linked to reality while drawing rather than appeciate fantasy specially created to appeal.
really rustles your jimmies famalam
>>31940418
if its shit, its shit, faggot.
if youre an artist there are rules you gotta follow to be a good artist. this artist is a stupid cunt who cant even keep something as simple as the eye color of his character consistent. i dont like cowtits anyways. i like my girls natural.
there are way too many flaws in their anatomy, not to mention rosa's fucking spine breaking in that one picture where shes on her knees, for this art to be appreciated. at least by me. period.
>>31942034
>his character
pardon, the character he's drawing.
>>31939018
They don't exist in our reality.
>>31940418
I just like the art style. It's obviously intended to be the way they drew it. I enjoy having a bit of differences in fictional stuff, or else I might as well just use pics of 3DPD. I don't see what's wrong with the anatomy of the pic either when it's heavily overemphasizing the traits his audience wishes to see.
It's good art for what it's supposed to be and I think the guy is a good artist. People get too hung up on stuff being absolutely perfect and if it isn't it's shit. Reminds me of people whining about Yasuda art. What is the artist's name anyway?
>>31942034
Preach it, nigga.
But seriously though, people who excuse horrible art with something along the line of "it's fantasy so it doesn't matter" should keep their mouth shut.
I don't mind if you want to fap to this either, but please don't go:
>There are people on this very planet who value more on following stupid rules linked to reality while drawing rather than appeciate(sic) fantasy specially created to appeal
Like you know what you're talking about
>>31939018
Rosa's misshappen boob
>>31939113
Says the furfag
>>31942290
>Using a Pokemon reaction image makes you a furfag now
>>31939999
>liking cowtits
wasted quads
>>31942214
It is well done art though. The bodily structure may be forced in a different manner because it's fetish art but the artist has talent. I can't fap to it because of the exaggerated proportions and posing but the shading, detail, and facial details are excellent for what it is. The other guy isn't necessarily completely right but the art is specifically made to look like that.
>>31940418
Some people don't share the same fetish that the creator was catering to. I know some guy who can only fap to hideous marvel comics style people, and some that find the same thing repulsive and shitty looking.
>>31939018
The asses are nice but the tits look off.
>>31942510
Ya, I understand that much; I just don't like having a valid point dismissed like that.
Hell, had he point it out like you did, I probably couldn't care less.
>>31940184
The ass isn't even presented to the screen.
Stop forcing it.
>>31940418
I'm not the type who knows anatomy 100% but there's even a point where one's suspension of disbelief can't hold together.
Sometimes the style can be jarring regardless of anatomical accuracy because there are shit choices made.
>>31942697
All I was trying to get across was that the art itself is well-done for what it is and the artist isn't a bad artist. Both sides started rather extreme, one making a dumb assertion of preference and the other calling it shit and the artist bad. I suppose that's what should be expected on 4chan but I can't say I like it.
I would actually expect an artist of this caliber to be a professional in their field, and could see them getting requests outside of their specialty.
>>31939018
i like bums but not that big
I don't really like big tits either
I like spandex though, so their clothing is good for me.
>>31942353
It does when it's used in Phox threads.