What did they mean by this?

File: QpR5d3G.png (2KB, 113x39px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 113x39px

*teleports behind you*
*presents evidence*
pshh, kid

>>31864488
Wyverns are a kind of dragon

>>31864488
Charizard's design is based on dragons, even though its in-game type isn't dragon. A lot of Pokémon's types are dumb like that.

But spyro is a dragon, I see nothing wrong with this

>>31864488
I know right? No matter with any form of credibility calls wyverns dragons.

File: ∕ tg ∕ intensifies.gif (118KB, 490x375px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 490x375px

>>31864488
>Wyvern
>Dragon
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>31864591

>>31864506

Monster Hunter also has monsters that look like dragons, but aren't of the Dragon Element

File: 715Noivern[1].png (691KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 1280x1280px

>>31864591

>NoiVERN
>Dragon type

>>31864488
>hur hur if isn't Dragon Type isn't a dragon

kys

File: Dragon Egg Group.png (515KB, 643x1558px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 643x1558px

These are (genetically) dragons in the Pokemon world

>>31864762
Okay but they specifically call out Charizard and not the Entire Dragon type which is way more obvious

>>31864725
And Gamefreak has no credibility. What's your point?

>>31864982
It's like you think normies know there's a type called Dragon

>>31864631
That grates my cheese.

>>31865854
You realize Pokemon is one of the most popular VIDEO GAME frnachises of all time right? The average normie knows FAR more than "hurr durr le pikachu and charizard".

>>31864725
>Primary Type: Flying
It's a bat that acts like a dragon, not a dragon that flies.

Anyone can edit wikipedia, right? Just edit the article and put "The entire Dragon type in Pokemon" or something according to their standards

why tf does wikipedia need a 'List of dragons in games'

like who does that help

>>31866011
A lot of wikipedia articles have a list of notable pieces of popular culture using the subject of the article.

>>31865943
It's a cloud that dragons

>>31864591
>>31864631
I always forget how much /tg/ crossposting there is here.

>>31864982
There are enough dragon types in pokemon that arent actually dragon.