Ash-Greninja have a fantastic design. the coloring of red-black-blue is good. the big-ass shuriken looks cool. people hate it only because it's "Ash", but if it was called in the games (You)-Greninja, people would have loved it.
A lot of your will disagree with me but I think Pokemon is actually good
>>31799392
I hate it cause I don't like hairy frogs those sideburns look disgusting.
>>31799392
I like Ash-Greninja. The concept itself is kinda eh, Ash getting a previously-unseen new thing in the bond evolution was a wasted opportunity that seems pointless, but there's room to expand upon it in future, I guess.
Red and blue are my favourite colours, and the design looks neat. I like how it took Greninja and turned it into something completely different gameplay-wise, without rendering Protean obsolete.
>>31799884
>hairy
>sideburns
Those are fins you know
>>31799392
What if Ash-Greninja is a lost-in-translation name?
Satoshi-Gekkouga could have a double meaning - a tribute to Satoshi Tajiri, the creator of the franchise, for the 20th Anniversary, since he created the franchise. That does explain why they kept the name Ash-Greninja and not (You)-Greninja.
>>31800305
Fuck Satoshi
>>31799392
I don't like it because Protean is more flexible, and it's a very subpar pokemon without Battle Bond being active. Until you can proc it, it's useless. It can't swap into anything, it can't do much damage, and it's a very easy to predict mon. Greninja is good because of its coverage with Protean. Without it, it's arguably one of the worst starters in the series.
>>31799392
I hate Greninja's retarded paper airplane head in general
>>31800376
>I hate great designs
>>31800771
>why do people like what I don't like.