thanks gamefreak for nerfing status as well as crits; can you now please do something about FUCKING DAMAGE ROLLS? theres no reason for damage to be this inconsistent, the game is enough RNG as is
>>31704116
If I wanted to play chess I could just go play fucking chess.
>>31704140
this
if the game becomes too static it will be even more fucking god awful than it already is
>>31704140
>>31704147
if you reallly want to keep them, then at least make it three ways and show me what roll I get : high roll, neutral roll and low roll, each being equally likely, so that I know what chances I'm working with. I dont want to be sitting there seeing my attack did 50% and not knowing wether or not the next one will take it out, which is vital information.
>>31704174
The multiplier is between .85 and 1, just assume you rolled min damage every time.
>>31704300
>just assume you rolled min damage every time.
you mean max right? otherwise I'll be telling myself that the next attack will do at least as much as the previous one. or what do you mean
>>31704316
Assume you rolled the minimum amount possible. For example if an attack knocks an opponents hp down to half, assuming you rolled the minimum amount of damage possible then you know the next attack is guaranteed to KO it.
>>31704342
>assuming you rolled the minimum amount of damage possible then you know the next attack is guaranteed to KO it.
yeah sure I can assume that, but in reality it might have been a high role and I have no clue wether or not the next attack kills. I get the mechanic, I just don't like it
>>31704368
op in a nutshell
rng is a part of the game. dont like it suck it up. fuck. are you a child who throws a tantrum everytime you cant win a game because you dont know whats gonna happen?