>gen 8
>50 regional forms
>30 new pokemon
>>31694615
GF couldn't even be arsed to give us new Megas in Gen 7, what makes you think we will even get new regional forms? It'll be more like:
>gen 8
>50 new Pokemon
>20 are legendary
>3 are event
>2 new Grass/Ghost Pokemon
>10 new Pikachu variants (Gen 6 had costumed Pikachu, Gen 7 has hat Pikachus)
>all regional are just Kanto mons again
Gen 9:
>30 new pokemon
>new starters
>generic 2 stage normal type
>3 stage normal/flying type
>Pikaclone
>"special" Pikachu
>rest are legendaries.
Gen 10:
>starters are Pikachu, Charmander, Squirtle, or Bulbasaur
>entire Dex is Kanto
>with some Pokémon gamefreak likes to shill, like Lucario
>Charizard Z introduced
Gen 11:
>Gen 1 rereleased in 3DS cartridge form.
>>31694725
>Gen 10
Honestly I can see them doing this for the 25th anniversary.
>>31694725
>Gen 12
>not compatible with previous games
>Kanto Dex
>half the dex is locked behind Amiibos
>all Megas and Z-moves are distributed at events
>breeding is part of the Pokemon Bank and no longer in-game
>Battle Tower removed because too hard
>rival no longer battles you and just helps out because competition is hard
>all trainer battles are optional
>you get exp just by walking
>day/night removed because too much coding
>doubles battle removed because slowdown
>Saving lots of data...
>>31694830
Gen 13:
>Hey You, Pikachu! remake
>>31694725
>Pikaclone
>"special" Pikachu
god no, not again, I want the dumb jolt rat to fucking vanish.
>>31695050
You're getting another Pikaclone and [Insert Adjective] Pikachu and you're gonna like it.
>>31694615
There is finite design space when it comes to new pokemon and I would rather have only 10 new pokemon which are well thought out than another Unova dex.
>>31695092
It's Gamefreak though. Your 10 new Pokémon would include starters and a Pikaclone, my dude.
>>31694725
>>31694830
yep this is the future of pokemon
>>31694615
>regional forms aren't new pokemon
ebin meme
>>31695236
>recolours are new pokemon
ebin
>>31695240
>new stats
>new look
>new types
>new abilities
>not new pokemon
i see
>>31695253
>not even the game itself considers them new pokemon
>he insists that they're new pokemon
>>31694830
and you will still buy it
>>31695275
If instead they were all split evolutions with different names, would that make it better?
>>31695315
We're stuck here, aren't we?
>>31695325
>different
Yes, actually. A Marowak is a Marowak is a Marowak. But a Bellossom isn't a Vileplume.
>>31695334
absurd logic tb.h pham
>hurr if a country only has people named jack it has a population of 1
>>31695348
Boi you can't even use both Alolawak and regular Wak on your team. For the game itself it's the same pokemon.
>>31695348
that's the dumbest fucking comparison I can't stop laughing
>>31694725
>Gen 11
>3ds
>>31695315
I haven't bought Sun and Moon yet, so maybe not.