What makes a Pokemon design great according to /vp/?
I see that a constant in most of /vp/'s opinions are the "it just gets bigger" thing. Generally, the most liked Pokemon are those that change their appearance a lot throughout the evo line, like pic related. What else would you say that makes a good Pokemon, good?
>>31567274
1) Have a Pokemon line stick to a theme
2) Make every Pokemon in said line adjust to this theme, while making a noticeable difference then the last form
3) Have the line have features that make sense for it to survive in the wild
That's what i like anyway
>>31567274
>What makes a Pokemon design great according to /vp/?
It should look good enough to fuck
Shot in the dark here It's has to look cool BUT it must not have fur and stand on 2 feet or have "edgy" colors I assume.
>>31567301
>It just gets bigger
As long as this rule works with my penis then it is a well designed pokemon
also
>Literally my mom
also works
>>31567306
Okay but how about this instead?
Not actually sure what most people think of this guy honestly
>>31567309
This. Pokemon should not be judged with your mind, but with your penis.
>>31567317
That's what I was alluding to actually. I love the mutt but many others despise it.
Good: what I like for whatever arbitrary reason
Okay: whatever I don't for whatever arbitrary reason
Bad: Mr. Mime
Step 1: Be Fug
>>31567274
Personally, I just like things that looks pleasing to the eye. I could care less if it was edgy or lacked details or had boring origins. As long as it looks pleasing, with a likeable theme and a nice color scheme, that's all that matters.
>>31567274
Golduck is good
Everything else is bad
>>31567300
Thanks for the advice.