>Want to play main series Pokemon >Don't want to play

>soon
Not before November or so at least.
And besides, isn't the Switch controller tiny as shit?

>tfw there are no mods on this board

>>31409719
>Don't want to play on the small screen and controller of the 3DS
But you want to play on the small screen and controls of the Switch. What logic is this?

>>31409846
>>31409749
Pro Controller on my HD Tv

>>31409846
>Click here
there are external controllers available. Plus, if you play it as a handheld without detaching the joycons the whole thing is being controlled like a PS Vita.

>>31409749
Switch is 6.2'', a New 3DS XL is 4.88'', while a classic 3DS is 3.53''.

>>31409934
It's a lot bigger than a Vita actually.

File: 1472736588222.png (504KB, 650x482px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 650x482px

>>31409719
So you want to pay for online?

I don't really keep up with video game rumors and news. Is there any weight to Stars being the 3rd version/port for switch?

>>31410094
Yes.

>>31410165
No.

>>31410094
It's nowhere written all games will need the switch gold subscription.

>>31410165
Just a tranny's rumors.

>>31410271
No but Pokemon pretty much requires you to be constantly online all the time.

>>31410320
More of a reason for the online not to be a premium service.

Nice blogpost
>>31410165
the person who claimed switch would have stars was utterly BTFO
Pokemon games will happen on the switch, just not anytime soon.

>>31409719
the pokemon game for the switch will not be a mainline game. Gamefreak will create a Sumo game (kinda like Pokken) called "pokemon Sumo" So that those litte faggots will stop calling Sun and moon "SuMo"

>>31410546
lmao

>>31409719
have fun having to pay to play online

>>31409719
>Want to play main series Pokemon
>Don't want to play on small screen and controlers, the traditional way to play Pokemon

>>31410667
Being true to traditions is good, being true to some traditions while dropping the bad ones is better.