>Want to play main series Pokemon
>Don't want to play on the small screen and controller of the 3DS
Guess I'll keep my fingers crossed that Stars is on the Switch and comes out soon
>soon
Not before November or so at least.
And besides, isn't the Switch controller tiny as shit?
>tfw there are no mods on this board
>>31409719
>Don't want to play on the small screen and controller of the 3DS
But you want to play on the small screen and controls of the Switch. What logic is this?
>>31409846
>>31409749
Pro Controller on my HD Tv
>>31409846
>Click here
there are external controllers available. Plus, if you play it as a handheld without detaching the joycons the whole thing is being controlled like a PS Vita.
>>31409749
Switch is 6.2'', a New 3DS XL is 4.88'', while a classic 3DS is 3.53''.
>>31409934
It's a lot bigger than a Vita actually.
>>31409719
So you want to pay for online?
I don't really keep up with video game rumors and news. Is there any weight to Stars being the 3rd version/port for switch?
>>31410094
Yes.
>>31410165
No.
>>31410094
It's nowhere written all games will need the switch gold subscription.
>>31410165
Just a tranny's rumors.
>>31410271
No but Pokemon pretty much requires you to be constantly online all the time.
>>31410320
More of a reason for the online not to be a premium service.
Nice blogpost
>>31410165
the person who claimed switch would have stars was utterly BTFO
Pokemon games will happen on the switch, just not anytime soon.
>>31409719
the pokemon game for the switch will not be a mainline game. Gamefreak will create a Sumo game (kinda like Pokken) called "pokemon Sumo" So that those litte faggots will stop calling Sun and moon "SuMo"
>>31410546
lmao
>>31409719
have fun having to pay to play online
>>31409719
>Want to play main series Pokemon
>Don't want to play on small screen and controlers, the traditional way to play Pokemon
>>31410667
Being true to traditions is good, being true to some traditions while dropping the bad ones is better.