>paying for online to use basic Pokemon online features
Shit man...I will defend Bank being like $5 a year but Nintendo might actually charge $60 a year.
For shit that has been free since Pokemon first went online back in DP.
>>31362051
TIMMY TIMMY TURNER
HE BE WISHIN FOR A BURNER
>might actually charge $60 a year.
How about we stop until they actually announce the price, it's not like Nintendo are going to change the price because of bitching.
For all we know it could just be $5 a year like Bank.Not saying it's likely
>>31364210
They raised 3DS price before coming out because of the Internet. People critizing (it means for positively or negatively, anon) can actually have a significant influence on a product.
The more you know. Idiot.
If they think I'm paying to get nothing but Abras they can fuck off. I don't mind paying for bank, but I'm not paying a goddamn fee to use features literally required to beat the game. I bought the fucking game, I will not buy the right to complete it,
I expect no more than 20. It's really shitty to sell that. Trading with friends is now 60 bucks plus a 20-60 Yearly fee? Nah.