Is this any good?
>>31318981
>charizard on boxart
>Is this any good?
No.
>>31318981
its good as a game, but bad by PMD standards
>>31318981
It's gameplay has been considered overall better than Explorers of Sky, but it is lacking in the story section.
If you play Mystery Dungeon for story, play Gates to Infinity.
If you play Mystery Dungeon for gameplay, play Super.
If you want a solid Mystery Dungeon game, play Explorers of Sky.
>>31319072
Top taste
>>31319072
/thread
>>31319072
Sky best game.
Best soundtrack in the series.
>>31318981
The first 10-14 hours are slow as fuck and easily the worst part of any PMD game, after that it gets surprisingly good.
It's hard for me to rate personally because the first part and second part are like completely different games. The first part is linear as fuck and is completely missing several mainstay features, but then the game opens up and they all suddenly come rushing back at once with a bunch of new features alongside them in the second part, and the tone and pacing of the story completely change too.
After the first part I'd give it a solid 8 or 9 out of 10, but with that first part making you go through a lengthy boring slog, I think I'd say overall more like a 6.
>>31318981
It's the best Generation 6 game.
>>31318981
i don't know just one day before the game arrive at my home my 3ds was stolen so up until to this day it still teasing me
>>31318981
Absolutely not.
Unless you like talking Pokemon, shit random dungeons every time, and abysmally boring combat.
>>31319369
That's like trying to pitch FFXIII
Don't do it anon
>>31318981
It's the only worthwhile game to come out of Gen 6. I still like Explorers more among PMD games but this was a huge step in the right direction after Gates.
>>31319072
I prefer Sky's gameplay but Super is still very good.