This is a Neopet...Is it not? What has Pokemon done to itself?

>>31182756
oh shit it is lol

I think Gen 6 had the worst designs honestly. So many of them are just shapes with rough theming.
Luckily, Gen 7 has some of the best.

>>31182799
I have come back from a long pokemon hiatus and then I see this and it's like I'm 9 again on my shitty ass dial-up.

File: 476987EF-4E40-401C-A9F3-D793E005F0D0-2415-000001F3A0A9EEE9_tmp.png (60KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 250x250px

>>31182756
Stayed the same

>inb4 cherry picking

Because that's what you are doing so I am too

Which generation do you think has, on average, the most solid designs?
>That's hard because Gen 6's bad ones are REALLY bad!
Just which has the highest percentage of ones you think are good is all.

Gen 6 had some of the best designs in the series, and a lot of them, but Amaura is really not one of them.

Why does it have toes on its back feet but not its front feet.

File: literally neopets.png (119KB, 688x426px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 688x426px

lol

>>31182837
The most solid designs? I would say Gen 2 or 6. >>31182819
This is a neopet man. Horsea is an OP.

>>31182951
this is good content. what else do we have?

File: sentret.png (50KB, 439x313px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 439x313px

>>31182984
>>31182951