Were Ultra Breasts and Tapus a mistake?

>>31024974
>Even implying Xurkitree was a mistake
Next time watch your fucking mouth before you spout absolute crap like this.

>>31024974
Yes.

>>31024974
No
They're the most inventive thing we've gotten out of Pokemon in decades
Shame only Tapu Koko and Nihilego got the spotlight
Fuck y'all, I wanted cutscenes that showed the monster that is Guzzlord appearing and being menacing

>>31024974
Probably but I love them

File: IMG_8658.png (87KB, 480x306px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 480x306px

>>31024974
>Ultra Breasts

File: 1482001540970.png (1016KB, 1050x1400px) Image search: [Google]

1016KB, 1050x1400px

>>31024974
>celesteela
>a mistake
delet this

>>31024974
>Ultra Breasts
No.
>Tapus
Yes.

I like UBs but its going to be annoying if they introduce new ones in every gen.

>buzzwole will never suffocate you with her ultra breasts
Why live?

>>31025098
>buzzwole
>she

>>31025823
>only female mosquitoes succ blood
Gee, I wonder

>>31024974
>Competitive
Yes. They are everywhere. At this point you barely even see regular pokémon in OU anymore, it's all Tapus, UBs and legendaries from previous gen. It's fucking awful

But competitive aside no. Tapus are the most interesting sublegendaries so far introduced (they could have more screentime though), and UBs are a neat concept that I hope they expand upon

>>31025842
>pokemon from other dimensions are mosquitoes

>>31025823
Yes.
>Leech Life (only female skeeters succ blood)
>hairless, smooth proboscis and antennae (both features of femsquitos)

>>31025904
UB isn't even a concept. It's just a name for pseudolegendarys. We won't see more of them in Gen8.

File: 1482601694608.gif (822KB, 600x366px) Image search: [Google]

822KB, 600x366px

> Xurkitree, Kartana, Pheromosa and Buzzwole
> mistakes

>the year is 2013
>OP is 15 and sees a "Were Megas a mistake?" thread
>"Dang, you have to be 18 or older to post on this website"
>the year is 2016
>"Finally, my time has come"
>starts typing
>"Were Ultra Beasts and Tapus a mistake?"

Aesthetically and conceptually? Yes. But in-game they contribute to a more diverse endgame roster which means we have more genuinely all-around viable Pokemon.

>>31028892

Expounding on this, I know Battlespot is literally just Legendaries, Tapus and UBs plus the maybe six regular Pokemon from this generation that are brainlessly easy to rely on - but it's honestly better in terms of variety than say, 5th Gen. Remember 5th Gen Battlespot? Aka Pseudolegendary Dragons and Dark And Fighting Types Plus Rain Teams The Online Experience™?