>People complain about all the gen I pandering in Gen VI and VII
>But don't complain about the much, MUCH worse gen I pandering in Gen II
Explain this.
>>31015041
Gen II was a direct sequel at the height of Pokemania
People bitch about gen 1 even though it's the 20th anniversary of gen 1.
People are stupid. There's your explanation.
>>31015041
That's called being a sequel, anon. I know it's very difficult for you to figure out with a sub 30 iq, but please try.
>>31015041
I mean it at least made sense in Gen 2.
Johto is literally bordering Kanto, and they share a league. (Also it was a direct sequel before GF decided they'd branch out more in other Gens)
Kalos and Alola have no real in story reason to be pandering to Kanto so much. It's just shilling to Gen 1 lovers
Gen 2 was developed as an expansion to Gen 1, a complement to round out the series and end it with style.
GF planned it to be the ultimate, last Pokemon game.
But of course being a Sinnohfetus with the aid of hindsight you wouldn't understand this at all. What gen 6 and 7 do is geniune pandering for the sake of it.