Google search trend of gen 7, alola starters over past 30 days

I thought that incineroar would have been higher then primarina

>>30917504
yeah, i always thought the popularity would be decidueye>incineroar>primarina. seemed like primarina had a huge jump over time

File: pokemon-sun-moon-starters.png (446KB, 1500x800px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1500x800px

they are all my favorite

This had been pretty consistent since the start, though with incinerator over primarina

File: 1481728098452.jpg (656KB, 1300x934px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 1300x934px

wooohoo my favorite pokemon.

no hate please.

Glad that prima baby is up there

Wtf, my favorite cat should be higher

Primarina=decidueye> incineroar

>it's totally not because poeple wanted to check if they spell it right

>>30917592
Nu-male.
>>30917634
Waifufag.
>>30917729
Barafag.

>>30917767
So u don't have the brain capacity to remember names?

It's seemed like around the past few days seal and cat search went down while owl got a little bump up. Interesting to see how it will turn out

>>30917787
Kek

>>30917450
>silvally is just as popular as the starters
yesss

>>30917787
I'm bara IRL (literally married to a bear)
but I like Primarina because waterfag and also she's hella qt

>>30917888
OK I like silvarrirary also

>>30917920
Post some pictures of u

So, instead of discussing the stats on the thread made for it you isolated a bit and made a new thread?

>>30917450
who even care

they all suck like every starter that's not zard, greninja and blaziken

Reminder that this does not mean favorites, it's search results.

a lot of primarina searches could very well be "primarina trap porn" for all we know

>>30917949
t. TPCi marketers

File: slowl.png (11KB, 715x151px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 715x151px

>>30917450

>>30917450
Judging by the figures presented it is safe to assume that nobody understands what the appeal of the Edge Owl or the Trap Seal is and decided to research.

>>30917945
The stats thread can be misleading as each evolution stage have different popularity level, thus there would be the confusion of saying this mon is better then that mon (but it may not be true as it could be the pre evo or the next evo that is more popular) This thread just focuses on the last stage.

File: 1347428397558.jpg (21KB, 478x345px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 478x345px

>>30917965
>why is primarina mostly male
>why is incinerator [sic] so ugly
>why is incinerator bipedal
google is a goldmine

File: hm.jpg (78KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 960x960px

>>30917940
OK

>>30917954
yup agree. and thus OP also only state is average interest, and not making a broad statement as who is most popular

File: 1464206988701.jpg (64KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x640px

>>30917965
>>30917995

>ITT OP mistakenly proves how shit his favorite starters are

>>30918022
Of course he doesn't outright state it, but it's obviously an implicit statement based on how he words it

The x > x > x is the classic way VP goes about shitposting their opinions. But moreover many people are too stupid to think correlation doesn't imply causation

>>30918065
well the statement made wasnt wrong technical? based on the figures it is the fact.

>>30918095
Yea no shit, it's the way people intemperate results which is why I said search results do not mean they are more popular.

>>30918239

yeah i dont deny that. there are other factors that also shows a mon's popularity such as sales, polls etc.

Not a surprising result