Battle tree or Battle Royale for fast points?
Tree.
Royale is 5000x slower.
Tree
Royale lag is a pain in the ass
>>30828941
Tree so long as your team isn't dicks.
just like the 2 before , tree is the best , go for it
1) Use your shitty story team to cheese wins in tree until you have enough points for a lucarionite.
2) Catch a riolu, evolve it, give lucario the mega stone.
3) Steamroll everything with mega lucario for max points
Farm at royale to get training items.
Train a competent team.
Farm at Tree.
>>30829027
Best set for m-lucario?
>>30828941
I'd say Royale once you learn how the system works. I usually get 3-5 BP per battle. You still get BP if you lose too
>>30829949
Close combat
Close combat
Close combat
Close combat
>>30831680
Dont forget it being proud of it's power
Casual Mode: Royale
Losing still gets you BP and matches don't take long. Doesn't make you rely on using just the absolute best mons available. Shitmons still don't stand a chance in Master Rank though.
Masochist Mode: Tree
The AI WILL cheat at the game to end your streak, but rewarded BP increases every 10 wins. Only for the people who enjoy beating unfair odds. Use Mimikyu, Tapus and UBs to even these odds. One can get by using proper team synergy. But chances are that like most of /vp/ you suck Smogons dick and expect the Tree to play with "optimal" sets. Hope you like getting fucked by physical Togekiss sets and Walrein!
>>30829750
This, once you realize how to cheese royale at the master level you can get 5 BP per game easy.
>>30829027
Can't believe I'm saying this but salamence would be a better choice wouldn't it?
More HP, defenses, speed so it can survive hits better
Aerilate cheese
Intimidate to make physical attackers even less of a threat
No earthquakes...but in exchange of ice beams
Not dissing the aura mutt but it can't take a hit i imagine.
>>30831680
>ghost types
>sturdy mons
>will o wisp/status mon