Perfect game

Imagine a titfuck from older Bianca.

>each time you lose to an oppenent all of your pokemon should get a minus 5 level penalty
That would make the game basically unbeatable if you ever lost, unless you feel like grinding to hell.

>>30740864
I think thats basically OP's point... he thinks we should go back to traditional rpg grinding style aka dragon quest.
There is a reason rpg are less and less popular. Grinding is just tideous but I got no issue having a more strategically challenging game

>>30740861
Imagine there being any actually good porn of older Bianca

>>30740832
Not sure if I am a fucking noob but making exp share post game exclusive would make the games instantly harder. you just need to make the ai less braindead then you have a challenging game. also better moveset for their pokemons

>Trainers can rebattle you after a certain amount of time
>Pokemon WILL not listen to you past the badge cap
>Anti-Rare Candies cost 1k Pokebucks
Did I make it harder?

>>30741064
>Trainers can rebattle you after a certain amount of time
With leveled up and approved mons.
Toxic still works outside the center and each faint costs the pokemon 5 levels

>>30740832
>each time you lose to an oppenent all of your pokemon should get a minus 5 level penalty
What the fuck is the point of this? If you're already behind, why would you be set back even further? Why force grinding?

Most other things are okay.

>>30741150
Costing levels would be a good thing in my scenario, though.

>>30740832
>>exp share should only be obtained after you beat the game
>>each time you lose to an oppenent all of your pokemon should get a minus 5 level penalty
>make it harder to grind
>need to grind now
Go ruin some other franchise.

>>30742826
>sudden Audino flashbacks

>>30740832
>exp share should only be obtained after you beat the game
>each time you lose to an oppenent all of your pokemon should get a minus 5 level penalty
It's a fucking kid's game and grinding is unfun.
Also why do the same 2 anons keep complaining about an item that you can turn off?

Here are my suggestions:
>AI difficulty can be toggled (outside of battle)
>for each individual pokemon, you can make it so that EVs of your choice will not be obtained
>when you start a new game, there are 3 options: Novice, which assumes you've never played pokemon before (tutorials); Veteran, which assumes you've played a pokemon game before (no tutorials except on stuff that is new or exclusive to this game); and Replayer, which assumes you've finished this game before (cutscenes progress quicker, no tutorials at all)
>VS seeker is back, and can be set so that you can choose to either battle their pre-ending or post-ending team

>>30740922
Strategy is good because it makes things interesting.

I want to see a pokemon game where your rival has a shiny and no matter how much you kick his ass they'll always be smug as fuck because of the shwing

>>30740832
I uh, do believe this is a game aimed at children, OP

>>30740832
>>exp share should only be obtained after you beat the game
Fuck you I like Exp share because I can train many new pokemon withouth spending hours.
Also you haven't even add the most importantthing:
>You can choose same numer as opponent
Suddenly game becomes harder

>Implement level cap
>beat gym results in the level cap being raised
Whew that was easy.

>>30747272
Thats actually a quiet brilliant idea.
If random trainers had more then just one pokemon in their disposal

>>30740832
>memecenter

>>30740832
Some totem battles already used abilities, though. Lurantis could call a Castform which would use sunny day, activating Lurantis' leaf guard and letting it fire off that physical solar beam, while Castform itself fucked your ass raw with Weatherball.

>>30745206
Seconded

File: 1471775185043.png (292KB, 600x592px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 600x592px

>>30740927
Never ever

>Each faint costs 5 levels
Completely retarded. Adds nothing to the game but meaningless grinding.

>>30747272
>>You can choose same number as opponent

This alone would make the games much more fun for me, especially if you had to choose blind without knowing the opponents roster. I generally do it as a self imposed rule as it is, but it'd be nice to see it codified. Though it'd require seeing more trainers with at least 2-3 pokemon to battle.

File: 1390247711591.jpg (438KB, 660x1403px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 660x1403px

>>30740861
All American baby.