In this game, Giratina is a midget.

>>30589867
I really dont see why they pushed so hard for trainers when it messed up the framerate, and still didnt make us more immersed because wrong sized pokemon became more apparent

>>30589867
I swear if the switch version doesn't have to scale models i'll be pissed. I kinda get it because the 3DS is garbage, but the switch should be more than able to handle proper sized models.

>>30589867
Yes, the models in-battle are completely fucked up.
Shame the dex doesn't have any sort of scale comparison, the Rotomdex is one of the shittiest dexes ever.

>>30589900
>proper sized models
>can't see a cutiefly when fighting wailord

This is why you niggas don't make games. Even PBR wasn't to scale.

>waah why aren't wailord to scale game ruined waaah
meanwhile you jack off to human-size salazzle porn ignoring that it's supposed to be 4ft tall

File: PIC_0012.png (732KB, 1140x684px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 1140x684px

>>30589867
And? Celesteela is taller than Giratina and looks small on battles but I don't have a problem, I like this game

File: PIC_00122.png (781KB, 1140x684px) Image search: [Google]

781KB, 1140x684px

>>30589990

File: rEguh1r.jpg (4MB, 8799x5525px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 8799x5525px

I seriously hope we get true scale back.

Especially considering they played with the sizes this gen but you'd never fucking know thanks to size limitations in battles.

I love hugemons so seeing Wailord, Wishiwashi, Celesteela and the like get fucked out of looking as cool as they really are is annoying.

>>30590079
>albino living in alola

did he dye?

>>30589990
Shaders really do magic, the game looks like shit without them.

>>30590098
where's celesteela

>>30589986
>implying

Here's a (You).

>>30589920
You post this every thread, and it's always wrong and gets shat on by everybody.

First off, you don't technically NEED to see the battle to know what happens. It's all irrelevant to the gameplay, it's just nice to look at. So in that extremely rare, fringe situation, it would detract absolutely nothing from the experience. In fact, you know damn well more people would enjoy it and meme about it on the internet than anything.

Besides, as if consistently innaccurate size models would off put 1 or 2 uncommon situations of jarring difference. Literally any pokemon that's supposed to be significantly larger or smaller than a human is jarring with the current system. It looks like fucking shit. Stop defending it.

>>30590129
what was the point of this post?

>>30589867
Somehow, that makes it adorable

>>30590098
True scale is there, Wailord all the way down to Joltik are the exact size of model they need to be. But they are scaled in-game to the size you see.

>>30590138
>it's irrelevant to gameplay
>but I'll still post about it's value

Neat!

File: 1392359417441.jpg (38KB, 540x684px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 540x684px

>>30589899
>Trainers finally visible in battle
>Character customization is present again
>2/3rds of the time i'm battling in the outfit you are given when using the ride pager
>3DS software can't even handle it, framerate drops everywhere
Bravo GF

>>30589908
>the Rotomdex is one of the shittiest dexes ever

Fucking this.

It never shuts up. Runs through the same shitty dialogue every time you get an entry. Plays the Rotom cry instead of the Pokemon you just caught.

What the fuck were they thinking.

>>30590205
>Implying mechanics are the only element of a game
>Implying "value" can only mean one thing
>"I'll just use vague terminology to try and make you look a fool, good sir!"

Yeah, stretch harder, faggot.

There's a clear difference between the size affecting the actual balance of mechanics, like in a fighting game, or this where it's literally just a numbers game. The visuals have absolutely 0 impact on the way a battle plays out, but if we have visuals, I expect them to be good. And theyre not. They look like shit.

>>30590115
Apparently no official art of decent quality so it wasn't included. Shame since I want to see her in it the most.

She's about as tall as the top of Alolan Exeggutor there, minus its head leaves.

>>30590198
Obviously, they can just scale the models up and down as they pleasure. Don't think it'd even be a performance hit.

I'm fairly sure the reason we don't have true scale on 3DS is simply the resolution. Anything remotely big would require distant cameras which would make anything small in the same shot basically indistinguishable.

Imagine trying to see a Caterpie while the camera is zoomed out far enough to show Celesteela or Wailord at true scale.

>>30590260
The ghost companion from Yokai Watch, my friend. Well, that, and the constant need for a companion in today's games (ala Midna, Fi, etc).

>>30590287
>I'm fairly sure the reason we don't have true scale on 3DS is simply the resolution.

Pretty sure you're dead on about this, yeah. Added to that, the generated contour line that they have around the models is meant to resemble sprite art (likely also as a stylistic compromise due to the shit resolution), instead of actual smooth, photoshop-esque lines like the official artwork, so even in less extreme situations like with say Grubbin to Solgaleo, what little you could see of it would likely just be black pixels.

>>30590098
Damn, Decidueye is tall. I pictured it as more like 3-4 feet.

>>30590138
>First off, you don't technically NEED to see the battle to know what happens. It's all irrelevant

Dumbest thing I've read all day. Might as well just make the games a text adventure.

>>30590274
Battles are already suspension of disbelief. Or do you really think people just instruct their pokemon to wait around till the opposing trainer has their move picked? Size does impact stuff related to the visuals. They would have to rework several animations to get them to scale right for big vs small encounters. But thats okay to waste time on that shit because your ego would be stroked.

And can't forget the memes as you so pointed out. We can't live without memes.

File: Cyndaquil.png (156KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 600x600px

Will my framerate be better if i play on a New 3DS?

My birthday is in a few days, but i also really like the Persona Q 3DS i have now,

i don't even know what's the best New 3ds special edition

>>30590435
Not by much. Not worth a new console for sure.

>>30590375
You're a retard. I'm not saying it shouldn't have visuals, I'm saying that they're not needed for the battles to function. Which is true, you could play the battles, with ease, only knowing the text on something like Showdown. That's a fact.

In fact, if you actually read the converastion you're shitposting about, you'd know I'm saying that the visuals should be better.

>>30590431
>Battles are already a suspension of disbelief, so lets just not put in any effort to make them look nice and just be shit.

Yeah, okay.

>They would have to rework several animations to get them to scale right for big vs small encounters.

Bullshit they do. Worked just fine in the Stadium and Colosseum games. Literally all they need to do is scale it.

Also, even IF they did, you're claiming that making the game look better is a waste of time. Yeah, no, no problem with that.

>>30590347
>constant need for a companion

I hate that shit so much. Doesn't help that the Rotom dex weirdly hits on you, calling you "big boy" and shit. I don't know who wrote that shit.

>>30590347
You YW shills never shut up, do you?

>>30590490
You're forgetting things launching beams and shit at one level and then adjusting to the smaller level. That looks like ass too. But that's okay, because scale!

>>30590490
>Worked just fine in the Stadium and Colosseum games.
Because they were on a fucking TV. And Pokemon like Roselia and Diglett got shit on because you couldn't see them properly.

>>30590522
>Rotom dex weirdly hits on you, calling you "big boy" and shit.

That's weird. I picked Chicken and only remember it calling me partner.

>>30590580
>You're forgetting things launching beams and shit at one level and then adjusting to the smaller level.

Okay, so even if that was the only way to handle it, that'd still be miles better than a midget Giratina fighting a giant worm.

But guess what, the game ALREADY deals with that, nerd. It just angles the beam accordingly to height. So, yeah, it is okay, because you literally lose nothing because the current system already fucking does that anyway.

File: 7982 - animated_gif tagme thumbs_up.gif (795KB, 250x200px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 250x200px

>>30590104
>did he dye?
underrated

>>30590606
>Because they were on a fucking TV.

Yeah, no shit faglord. We're talking about a Switch port, not what's on the 3DS.

>And Pokemon like Roselia and Diglett got shit on because you couldn't see them properly.

Good. It should show the size descrepancy. Besides, it's not like they have dynamic, moving camera's or anything that show them from different angles. I mean, thats fuckin crazy talk right?

how do you even have giratina here

>>30590435
I've seen some side by side comparisons and there is a small difference. I have an older 3dsXL and when my Incineroar uses Darkest Lariat, it occasionally gets laggy. But that's the only instance I've noticed it.

Short answer, yes. Long answer, yes, but not in any considerable way IMO

>>30590104
leave.

>>30590539
>tfw autismo rage is so strong that mere mention of Yokai Watch inflicts uncontrollable blood rage

feelsbadman.jpeg. yw shills always win. u.u

>>30590703
post game

>>30589908
>Rotomdex is one of the shittiest dexes ever.
You shut your whore mouth.

>>30590727
>autism is so strong that you have to insert YW into everything
I feel bad for you.

>>30590828
>aspie ywshill bloodrage so strong that you can't tell advocation apart from passing mention

when will ywshill ever learn?

>>30590230
Dud wtf you cant post that pic here go back to pol you idiot

>>30590882
>post a la "direct copy"
>"passing mention"
Okay.

>>30589899
The worst part is that we lost two game modes because of it.

File: Rotom.jpg (31KB, 404x336px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 404x336px

>>30590522

>>30590106
I hope you don't think those shaders look good.

>>30590138
so I guess we just shouldn't have models or sprites at all then

>>30590974
>implying it the talking ghost companion wasn't influenced by the other talking ghost companion
>implying SM wasn't being developed at the same time Yokai Watch was at it's popularity height
>implying this major radical shift out of nowhere is just a coincidence
>implying even if it was somehow false, you're not being an autismo for raging out about it pointlessly anyway
>implying the anon who brought it up was even me

>>30590435
>Will my framerate be better if i play on a New 3DS?
Ever so slightly.
I can't help but wonder if the game would have run without frequent drops if they had just left out the trainers in battles.

>>30590522
>>30590608
Is their any dialog from Rotom that makes it lean on what gender it would have been if it could actually have one?

>>30591048
Can you fucking fags at least read what you're posting about before you make yourselves look like even more of an idiot?

>>30590347
>(ala Midna, Fi, etc).
You know Zelda has had companions since Ocarina of Time right?
That was nearly 20 years ago.

>>30591114
No, it has a crush on both Ilima and an aether grunt too.

>>30591119
What's there to read?
You're pretty much saying that people shouldn't want more than the mediocrity they have.

>>30591158
Apparetly all of it needs to be read, because I literally said the exact fucking opposite.

>>30589867
why don't they just make them normal size or do some camera magic to make their mis-sized models seem big?

i feel like there are multiple ways of fixing this

>>30591076
>>implying it the talking ghost companion wasn't influenced by the other talking ghost companion
You mean the one from Mystery Detective? Yeah.

>>implying SM wasn't being developed at the same time Yokai Watch was at it's popularity height
>implying the game influenced by YW was SM and not XY

>>implying this major radical shift out of nowhere is just a coincidence
What?

>>implying even if it was somehow false, you're not being an autismo for raging out about it pointlessly anyway
I fail to see how a small, forgettable "you YW shills never shut up" post is "raging about".
Maybe it's somebody else that's raging and can do nothing but respond, mmh?

>>30591149
The Female Aether Grunt?

>pokemon never had size-appropriate mons outside spinoffs
>now it has to for some reason

>>30591186
Just so you know "literally" doesn't mean "I thought I said that but said something else entirely".

>>30590138
Let's just read everything then, there's no need to see shit

>>30591272
Yes

File: Golurk.jpg (50KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 480x640px

>>30590949
I'm just posting my favorite jewish pokemon, what's wrong with that?
Here's my second fav

>>30591186
>because I literally said the exact fucking opposite.
Dude, you LITERALLY said that people should stop saying they want true scaling because it doesn't matter.

>>30589899
They're all scaled to the trainer for following pokemon in Stars

>>30591292
>>30591323
>>30591344

Alright faggots, since you can't fucking figure it out on your own, i'll break it down for your dumbasses.

>Anon says "we should have to-scale models on the switch!

>Faglord >>30589920 replies "No, that's impossible, le game design memes"

>I reply >>30590138, saying in summation and essence "no, it is possible, because the visuals have no impact on the actual game mechanics in Pokemon, its pure strategy. They should have to scale models, the visuals should be better."

>I then continue on for several posts arguing in favor of having more accurate visuals


This is the part where you all come in, decide not to read anything, and then say a bunch of stupid shit.

Get it now, retards?

>>30590435
Not really

>>30591186
>First off, you don't technically NEED to see the battle to know what happens. It's all irrelevant to the gameplay,

literally word for word. we don't need any models, sprites, or anything really. according to you, it is irrelevant and we would be just as good off if the trainers just looked at each other in the over-world and selected moves.

>>30591400
Good lord.
It's like you don't even know how words work.

Both you and him are retarded but you more so because you couldn't comprehend your own text.

>>30591400
>visuals have no impact on game mechanics, so focus should be put into the visuals!

how about we don't need scaling because it's irrelevant to the gameplay?

>>30591433
>>30591463

I said that because having to scale models wouldn't negatively impact gameplay whatsoever, because visuals have no direct influence on the game itself, you fucking moron. Its not like fucking context matters, right? It's not like you just inserted some random implication that was the exact opposite of what I was saying, right?

This isn't a fucking fighting game or a shooter where scale matters for gameplay reasons. Yet that's what the second anon was implying.

>>30591504
See: >>30590274

>>30591511
>this isn't a game where scale matters for gameplay reason

thank you for agreeing with me. we don't need models to scale because it has no effect on the gameplay.

you're literally arguing against yourself here

>>30591566
See: >>30590274

>>30591114
If I recall correctly, it calls the trainer female naughty girl at least once.

>>30591573
>visuals have absolutely 0 impact on the way a battle plays out.

exactly! thanks for proving my point. we don't need everything to scale because the visuals don't matter

>>30591573
You do realise that linking to a post that people have already commented on and torn apart does absolutely nothing for your argument or person other than show how idiotic you are right?
Also you still have yet to refute your own words.

>>30589867
im tall so this is more immersive
you manlets

>>30591604
Do they NEED to? No. Never fucking said that they NEED to be. However, I expect the visuals to look good, especially in a scenario where they have no outstanding effect on the mechanics of the game, and thus can do whatever without stressing the mechanics.

You don't technically NEED anything, but just because there's no direct necessity, how is that somehow a bad thing to objectively improve it? If your point was purely "hurr we don't NEED to do that", then yeah it's correct but that literally means nothing of any importance because we also dont need to be playing a video game either.

>>30591660
>I expect the visuals to look good especially in a scenario where they have no outstanding affects on the gameplay

do you know what the fuck you're saying?

>I expect time, effort, and money to be put in to this, especially when it does nothing!

>>30591620
>>30591692
Ah, yes, the good old
>i've been thoroughly butt blasted, so instead of arguing against the shown counter arguments, i'll act smug and vague about my points to pretend im still right

Maybe you should take a pointer from this, and actually read the entire conversation, so you can understand the context, instead of just taking a random selection out of it and adding in your own narrative. It'll save you a lot of butthurt.

>>30591726
Again, another faggot who fails to read. Once again, I'll direct you to this post: >>30590274

Just because it doesn't directly affect gameplay, doesn't mean it has no value. Otherwise, according to your logic, the game should be nothing but a spreadsheet. No music, no visuals, nothing, its all wasted time, money and effort.

>>30591780
linking to your post again isn't making it less retarded

>>30591780
I'll just take a page from your own book and direct you to this >>30591620

>>30591802
Alright. I'll bite. What "words have I yet to refute"?

>>30591780
>so instead of arguing against the shown counter arguments
What counter arguments?
You don't even understand why we're calling you a retard. How can you form one without knowing that much?

>>30591818
the ones that are made out of letters

>>30591818
How about your entire post saying no one should ever want better visuals in a visual medium unless it's specifically about the visuals?

>>30591604
The only thing the visuals need to do is be accurate to the lore to prevent disbelief and they're not. If they wanted to have the models that size they should have just wrote the mons as that size in the fucking dex. You people will literally defend GFs every shitty action.

>>30591879
>implying the dex is canon

>>30591822
As far as I can tell, there's 3 different people/reasons,
>1 too stupid to read or use context clues so they completely took the "visuals technically don't matter" out of context, thinking it meant that there shouldn't be any improved visuals at all, when it meant the opposite

>1 saying i'm wrong to think visuals should be improved because they have no value, in complete contradiction to the first one, thereby defeating any sense of unity you're trying to imply

>and 1 saying "hurr u dont know how words work", because they again couldn't pick up context clues, likely because they too initially failed to read before shitposting.

But please, if I'm missing anything, do tell.

>>30591865
Right. So you're shitposting. Got it.

>>30591872
What, you mean the one I already fucking refuted? Read: >>30591400 and >>30591511

Also the entire original argument.

Since you fags have a hard time doing that, i'll sum it up again: I said visuals don't directly effect gameplay mechanics, so that there's no downside in improving the to-scale representation. Is that short enough for you to fucking handle?

And dont even fucking meme at me with "hurr backpedaling" bullshit, because you can RIGHT NOW read through all of that god damn shit, and see that is exactly what I was saying.

>>30591971
Lets get to the root of the problem.
Is English your first language?

I mean at this point you're just rehashing your "arguments".

>>30591971
>1 too stupid to read or use context clues so they completely took the "visuals technically don't matter" out of context, thinking it meant that there shouldn't be any improved visuals at all, when it meant the opposite
>visuals technically don't matter, so they should be improved

not making any sense

>I said visuals don't directly effect gameplay mechanics, so that there's no downside in improving the to-scale representation.

the downside is putting resources into things that don't effect gameplay

>>30592018
Fuck yeah I'm re-using those arguments, because those arguments were never fucking disputed. The two arguments seperate ended in the other anons leaving because they had nothing left to say. Now it's just a couple of you cum guzzlers left who can't follow a train of a conversation and are two bamboozled to understand that not once did I contradict myself.

Literally the only explanations I have left for this is you fags think someone else saying shit is me because you don't get the whole "anonymous" thing and can't track a conversation, or you're just le epic baiting to "save face".

>>30591382
will you get the fuck out?

>>30592112
Visuals don't matter to the mechanics. But they have overall value. Mechanics aren't the only fucking part of a video game.

By that logic, anything not directly affecting mechanics doesn't matter. Do you suggest they should stop producing new music per game? That takes time and money, yet doesn't affect gameplay mechanics.

>>30592113
>re-using

so it's not your first language then?

>>30589867
>Wailord

>>30592113
You failed to answer the question anon.

>>30592146
I never said things that don't effect gameplay "technically don't matter." you did. I think they matter, but I'm going by your logic here.

File: literallyyou.png (155KB, 500x434px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 500x434px

>>30592165
Literally. You.

>>30592210
I was saying that they technically didn't matter to the mechanics, not the entire fucking thing. In that one post you were replying to, I didn't specify, but I did multiple times prior to that, so if you were actually reading you'd realize. Jesus fuck dude, I feel like I need to fucking write proofs for you.

Literally my entire argument was "they should improve the visuals because there's no downside to it"

>>30592286
You do realise we're asking you this because it doesn't seem like you understand basic English right?
Not that you did something as simple as a typo.

>>30592210
To further elaborate, they technically do not affect the gameplay. However, just because they don't affect the gameplay, that doesn't mean that they don't matter or have no value. In no way did I ever state that they don't have value. In fact, >>30590274 here I directly said the opposite of that. I said that that they do in fact have value, but that they have no direct influence on the gameplay, THEREFORE they could implement accurate, to-scale models, without having to consider any mechanics changes, further implying that they should, indeed, strive to make the visuals as best as they can. They have the free room to do it, unlike something like a shooter where size matters directly to gameplay, so why not take advantage of that freedom?

>>30592366
I do realize that. I also realize that you're grasping pretty hard to save face on being called out.

>>30589899
>Push so much for trainers in battles
>Kills the framerate in doubles
>Probably why they removed triples and rotation
I hope it doesn't return next time

>>30592286
>oops I accidentally typed a hyphen

Well, you don't know what "typo" means so yeah it's definitely not your first language.

>>30592286
you do need to write proofs. that's what we've been fucking sking

>>30590539
Not a shill. Never played it. Just saw someone mention it and it seems like an odd coincidence.

You fucking cocklord.

>>30592474
>unlike something like a shooter where size matters directly to gameplay

so having models to scale is only important when it isn't important for gameplay?

>>30592474
>I also realize that you're grasping pretty hard to save face on being called out.
Called out on what exactly?

You're the only one who's trying to save face by avoiding this simple question.

>>30591129
Yes, you stupid fucking faggot. Didn't think I needed to list every companion Link has had.

>>30592564
You're missing the point.
A game that came out 20 years ago is hardly a game of "today".

It's certainly not a modern idea.

>>30590138

I want to call you retarded, but no this actually isn't completely unfeasable. We already have a ton of attacks where it shows the attacking pokemon, then cuts to the defending.

Not to mention scaling up models is piss easy

>>30592555
>so having models to scale is only important when it isn't important for gameplay?

No. That's not what I said. However, size differences do matter when they affect gameplay, yes.

Take a fighter for instance. If I wanted to add a supersized character like in Tatsunoko vs. Capcom, I CAN do that, but I need take into consideration how that would affect gameplay. The size of the hit and hurtboxes matter directly to how it plays, so it takes extra effort to implement. To scale still matters, but it's not just as simple as "make character big, now ship game."

With Pokemon, there would be no consequence on STRICTLY the mechanics of the game, so they have no further consideration or adjustments to make on STRICTLY the mechanics of the game in order to scale them. The visuals are enjoyable, and have value being there, but that value is not at all tied in any way to the mechanics. Thus, the implementation would be easy, and be at no loss of time on the developers' part to make more accurate.


>>30592506
>you need to write proofs because i'm too stupid to follow a conversation.

Literally retarded.

Also no one fucking asked that, moron. I don't know why you would. The information you need has been written down multiple times. I can't believe I'm actually doing this, but I'll go through it yet again:

>Original anon complains, saying that they should make models to-scale next time.

>Next anon replies, >>30589920 saying that to-scale models don't work, and implies the original anon doesn't know principles of game design

>I reply >>30590138, saying the visuals of this game don't directly affect how it plays, therefore they could effortlessly make them more accurate with no downside, therefore they should be compelled to make them as best as they can in their restriction-less state.

>Several anons who decided not to read the posts before or after come in, read only the line "visuals dont technically matter", proceed to sperge out.

>>30592736
learn to take context clues and you would know people were :^)

File: post release.png (820KB, 1000x629px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 1000x629px

>>30590098
Ahaha you posted my image
Good thing I added the watermark

Anyway, here's the updated version

File: 1480305032387.jpg (80KB, 643x820px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 643x820px

>>30592736
you're still going?

I got it guys. No more need to shitpost. Just have a magnifying lens effect to off the smaller mons at all times. Everyone wins.

>>30592793
xD dude thats so cheeky!

I guess it's a good thing I already said all of that shit in that post several times already prior to this! OwO

>>30592809
>salazzle is 4ft tall
>doesn't even come up to an 11 year old's shoulder

I think it's a little off

>>30592871
oh right, it's probably because she's kind of crouching

>>30592826
It's like fucking clockwork, I swear to god. You fags grasp at straws to argue, then when a post gets down to the nitty gritty and filters all of your bullshit out and proves to you without any room for error that you were wrong, you nerds just go "lel too long to read". It's a pure defense mechanism that you use to shield yourselves from feeling like a damn fool.

File: 1460387824992.jpg (47KB, 538x305px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 538x305px

>>30590949

>>30589986
I don't jack off to porn unless it's accurate

>>30592890
>You fags grasp at straws to argue,
How can we grasp at straws to argue when there's no argument being given?

Right now you've gone off on a complete tangent from the current conversation and no one knows what you're doing.

>>30592916
>can't into ironic mocking shitposting

should have known you were a newfag

>>30592871
Anon, salamanders (and of the like) are measured from head to tip of tail. Obviously if you were to stretch her out hehe she'd come to about 4 feet

>>30592916
He's obviously being ironic you fucking faggot.

>>30592898
pretty sure you're the new one...

anti-semitism is bad

>>30592928
Literally how can you even say that, when that post that was "lulz 2 long 2 read" was in direct response to an argument?

Oh. Right. Because you didn't read it. Fucking faggot.

>>30592935
wow it's almost like I was, too!

File: 1473359817029.png (265KB, 512x499px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 512x499px

>>30592939
>ellipses
>no capitalization
>deflecting the argument
>>anti-semitism is bad

>>30592968
maybe if you had a concept of coherence, you would realize he was referring to previous posts. I swear, you're a fucking robot.

>>30592968
>when that post that was "lulz 2 long 2 read" was in direct response to an argument?
Because literally none of it made sense given what we said to you.

And keep in mind you aren't just talking to one anon but multiple.

>>30593010
an image macro of some guy that I'm supposed to know somehow? nice, you really oroved me wrong! go back to memebase.

>>30592970
yeah nice damage control faggot. I've already proven MULTIPLE times as to why models should be to scale, and all you can do is make "lul no" statements

>>30593026
Referring to the previous post, huh? Except he just contradicted you here:

>>30593028
How the fuck didn't any of that make sense? Are you actually fucking kidding me?

>Anon asks about importance of model size/accuracy to mechanics, I reply explaining how they do in what circumstances.

>In same post other anon says I need to write proofs to clarify what I was saying. Didn't technically write proofs, but I clarify.

What about that didn't make any sense. Please. Explain.

>>30593071
>some guy that I'm supposed to know somehow
I concede. You've baited me good.

File: carlcuck.jpg (39KB, 600x615px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x615px

>>30593101
>are you actually fucking kidding me?

>>30593101
>Except he just contradicted you here:

>And keep in mind you aren't just talking to one anon but multiple.
Yeah try again.

File: mockup.png (57KB, 585x451px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 585x451px

>>30592830
See this is perfect. So much realism here.

>>30593187
I'd play it.

>>30593159
So you're just replying out of order, not specifying, and getting confused when the responses lines up in a direct reply chain and not in random order based on your own (You)'s. Got it.

>>30593238
yeah get fucked bitch

>>30593238
More like you're either refusing to answer directly or just not addressing the point at hand. It's literally right in front of you.

>>30593334
Alright, what point? Explain. Don't be vague. What point at hand did I not already address?

Are you talking about the bullshit "hurr is english your first language" bait? Because yeah, it is my first language. Not like it fuckin matters. It could be my fifth language, it wouldn't change how shitty you are at comprehension.

>>30593398
but it's not your first language.

>>30593518
What are you fagging on about?

>>30592736
Holy shit you are so fucking stupid it hurts.

>>30593552
>I have no argument, so I'll just throw insults!

>>30593575
No it's just that you put up a massive pile of shit that I don't care to dissect. I read the first few sentences and I can tell that you're braindead.

>>30593575
You can't argue against someone that doesn't present one.
So you're kind of right there.

>>30593612
Read as: I'm too scared to get proven wrong, so i'll just avoid it and call you names, you big dummy!

>>30593619
What about this >>30592736 contains no argument?

>>30593644
That post is literally you just reposting the same thing again with a little rewording.

>>30592564
>you stupid fucking faggot
>doesn't understand the other poster's point

>>30593686
Yeah, it is. And, like before, it's followed by total lack of an argument from anyone else, just people grasping at the slightest bit of insults that they can to save face. No counterargument, no "that argument is wrong for this reason", etc.., nothing.

So whats your issue again?

>>30593727
>it's followed by total lack of an argument from anyone else
That's because you've ignored each and everything given to you and proceeded to respond with the same posts over and over.
That or you've just ignored posts to go on an irrelevant rant.

There's only so much idiocy people can take anon. After a while they're just going to stop replying seriously to you.

>>30593803
You think he's got a folder with screencaps of 4chan "arguments he "won""?

>>30593803
Holy shit. What fucking post did I ignore? Please. Fucking show me. Use the fucking reply function that 4chan has conveniently built into it, and point me in the direction.

EVERY TIME I've asked you to show me where this magical, phantom argument I'm not replying to is, there's no response on the matter. So either show me or shut the fuck up.

>>30593837
I wouldn't put it past him.

>>30593727
because you're "argument" was debunked a million times the first time you said it and all you do is say the same thing like a robot.

>>30593839
I think you're colorblind for posts that prove you wrong

>>30593919
Fucking show me where. Because nigga, I don't see it.

Yet again, I ask, and no one can come up with these magical posts.

>>30593839
>Holy shit. What fucking post did I ignore?
Just look at that text wall you've posted, you even admitted that it was just you repeating the same thing over and over because "it's followed by a total lack of an argument from anyone else".

You basically just said you stuck your fingers in your ears and went "no no no no no".

>>30593957
oh you're one of those niggaposters? explains everything

>>30593985
So once again, you fail to show anything. In all preceding times i've re-iterated those statements, those reply chains ended, because no one counteracted the final arguments.

Actually show me what I didn't reply to. Fucking do it. Use the reply function, faggot.

>>30594249
lol no you do it. you're fucking mad lol

>>30592809
>Good thing I added the watermark
It's not like anyone was claiming that the image was their own, mate.

We get it, you put the effort in to make it, but that doesn't mean anyone reposting it is trying to steal it. Surely the entire point of making something like this is for it to be passed around as a general informative image?

Either way, do you have the full resolution version of that one?

>>30592809
what are people going to steal that and get money or credit from it? you just copy pasted artwork

>>30594249
>you fail to show anything.
Like I said your own post is literally proof of that. People refuted your previous arguments and yet you just reworded them and threw them back out.

> those reply chains ended, because no one counteracted the final arguments
That's not how it works anon. You still have yet to provide an adequate counter argument.
Claiming they've ended just because you refuse to answer isn't making you look any better.

>Actually show me what I didn't reply to.
You've conveniently placed them into your text wall. Good for me huh?
On top of that you've admitted you've not addressed their points here >>30593727 and passed it off as them "saving face".
Not to mention that anon you ignored here >>30592018 and still haven't given an adequate response to. In fact you avoided the question completely for no particular reason.

>>30594044
>>>/tumblr/

>>30594387
How much do you want to bet he'll just go
>SAVING FAAAAAAAACE
again?

>>30594391
>nigga wat
>lol nigga
>nigga lmao

>>>/twitter/
>>>/facebook/
>>>/gaschamber/

>>30592489
The switch will be more than capable for handeling that

>>30594519
Not with GF at the helms.

>>30589900
>I kinda get it because the 3DS is garbage, but the switch should be more than able to handle proper sized models.

the 3ds to switch gap is like a pond compared to a lake
even if the switch has the same power as a wii u, that's still at least 5 times more power than the 3ds

>>30594274
>Y-youre just m-mad right?

>>30594387
>Your post is literally proof of that

No it's fucking not. If no one replies to the what I originally re-iterated and clarified, and then people continue to ask "what?", thats not proof I didn't answer or make an argument. It means that argument was ignored.

If you ask me what time it is, and I answer five o'clock, yet you don't reply and ask again, that doesnt' mean I never said it in the first place.

>You still have yet to provide an adequate counter argument.

Except I did.
The argument was "you said visuals dont matter!" and I explained why thats NOT what I said. Multiple times. And yet when I do, its ignored.

>You've conveniently placed them into your text wall. Good for me huh?

What the fuck? Are you referring to >>30592555
>>30592506
these two, in this >>30592736? If not, what ones?

>On top of that you've admitted you've not addressed their points here

???
What??
Except that's not fucking at all what was said in >>30593727. How can I admit to something, and also pass it off as something else? That makes fucking no sense.

>Not to mention that anon you ignored here >>30592018

Actually, faggot, I did reply to that eventually, here. >>30593398
And the reason I ignored it was because it had no relevance, and was clearly just bait. And guess what? When I replied to it, and was the response? It was>>30593518, complete denial to the answer of the pointless question anyway.

Imagine spending 4 hours straight shitposting on /vp/.

Just imagine it.

>>30594770
The hilarity is only matched by the sadness.
Seriously though this anon has some kind of mental issues.

He honestly does think he's making a defense for himself.

>>30590129
4u for you

>>30594646
>literally making text walls filled with jargon just to put people off from arguing with you.
What a pathetic way to post.

And you STILL haven't got an argument.
Yeesh.

>>30594921
Right. So you're just baiting.

>>30594936
>I'm just baiting
The irony.
Just so you know I'm not the anon you were talking to. I'm just calling you one sad motherfucker.

>>30594967
Yet still no counter argument. Just a "youre saying nothing". Its like fucking groundhogs day.

>>30594987
Duh. I'm not arguing with anyone here,