ITT: Make the games worse by altering mechanics or adding new

1% fishing chances

>>30327592

TR actually steals your pokemon

>>30327592
All pokemon flee if you score a critical hit, super-effective hit, or fail to catch.

>>30327637
That would actually be really based. It would make the battles a lot more tense.

Pokemon will be able to summon other Pokemon onto the battlefield. You won't be able to catch anything if there's more than one guy in battle. We'll even make some Pokemon available in the wild only through being called for help.

>>30327592
Make the items obtainable by BP now obtainable by micro transactions via some shop in the game which use e-shop credits.
Exp share is given to you by the very start (even earlier) and you can't turn it off, now it's a basic mechanics, not even an item anymore.
Teleport not usable outside of battle (seems they already did this monstruosity)

>>30327592
Ditto can no longer breed.

>>30327592
You have to PokeGo balls at pokemon.

>>30327592
You have to aim the ball throws a la Go

File: 1289425468597.jpg (69KB, 450x403px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 450x403px

>>30327790

>>Pokéballs will sometimes miss if the Pokémon has raised evasion
Funny joke, OP. This actually happened in Gen 1.
>http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/198314-pokemon-yellow-version-special-pikachu-edition/50523100

>>30328236
Nah, make BP items obtainable with those weird Nintendo coins you get from walking with the system on/shaking it. Sounds much more possible given Go and the Pokewalkers.

>>30328666
You misunderstand how Gen 1 capture mechanics work.

Instead of having multiple checks via shaking to determine whether you capture a Pokémon, the number of shakes of a Pokéball is tied to its capture chance directly. The lower the chance, the less shakes it gives if you fail.

"You missed the Pokémon!" is the message you get for the lowest catch chances. It just means you have a very small chance of catching the Pokémon. If you do manage to capture it, it will always give all three shakes and then be caught, with nothing between missing the Pokémon and capturing it ever appearing in the fight (unless you raise its capture rate with something like freeze, of course).

>>30327637

This is enough reason for another Kanto remake.

File: SkullHard.jpg (27KB, 599x359px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 599x359px

>>30327637
What if it was an XCOM style system, where blacking out lost you one of your mons, but you could reclaim it in a battle later?

>>30330059
That would be good shit. But you'd need to keep a fallback 'mon if you were really fucking underage.