Does catching a pokemon violate the NAP?
The NAP extends to animals?
Shit I better not butcher any cows.
>>30043378
No, but trying to catch a traimer's pokemon does. In this case he has the right to contract Team Skull to nuke you and your property otherwise you're living in a communist dictatorship with roads.
Here is a question, assume you are walking along your property line when you see that the adjacent property line's owner is being attacked by a pokemon. Let's also assume you had a master ball on hand.
Now you could catch the pokemon, but you would violate the neighbor's NAP. Or you could let him get killed. Which is the ethical choice?
>>30043564
Ask your neighbor if he needs help.
>>30043587
But what if he doesn't like the soundwaves of your voice towards his autoproperty? Would it violate the NAP?
>>30043710
Text him.
>when you realize the pokemon world is the same as ancap strawmans with pokemon replacing military hardware
>>30043758
>When you send your son to his bedroom but he annexes your Fridge using his Charizard, so you have your Alakazam mind wipe him and reprogram him to be more obedient.
>>30043758
>win a pokemon battle
>rape the loser and lock them up on my McRape Dungeon(tm) (Now with ergonomic shackles for slaves of all shapes and sizes! New colors available!)
>Their family disagrees with my decision
>wipe the floor with them with my lv 100 Smogon Approved Anti-Revenge Anything Goes Pokemon Team
>Only to realize my Platinum Smogon Waiver Of Copyright Pass just expired and violate their rights over the build and composition of my team, so I have to spend the rest of my life doing slave work to pay the extraordinary prices for legal fees in a corrupt private court and copyright infringement fine
>>30043587
kek
ancaps are dumb as fuck
>>30043564
Let it kill him and then annex his property.
>>30045061
this
>>30044875
>NAP
Slip in, pull the switch, and get the hell out of dodge. I'm extremely stealthy. No one will ever know