Stop denying it. Everything after Gen one was shit. Only real

>>30006429
>(you)

>>30006429
If you change "bad tier" to "okay tier" then you'd probably, sadly, find many post-college age normies who agree with your list.

>>30006429
running shoes were a mistake

>>30006429
here have it, saged though

>>30006429
kys retard

>>30006429
Fags like you give GenWunners a bad name.

>>30006429
>>30006434
>>30006454
>>30006475
>>30006475
>>30006503
>>30006515
Anime was my favorite video game Haha LOL XD

>>30006547
>genwunners

>having a good name at all

Genwunner is an insult

and I'm offended

>>30006429
Lol even the games with exactly same storyline and world but with improved graphics are in the shit tier

Pokemon has always been shit and it shouldn't have existed

File: The Only True Answer.png (2MB, 1552x932px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1552x932px

>>30006429
You are a braindead troll

File: 1464218960418.gif (186KB, 500x491px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 500x491px

>>30006429
Even if you're a genwunner - and you're probably not, you're probably just fishing for (You) - I don't see how you could possibly think RBY and GSC top FRLG and HGSS. They're the same games but better in every way (except, on some counts, the music).

>>30006561
not that guy but in this day and age you can't be a fan of Gen 1 without being called a Genwunner (even though you don't exhibit any traditional traits of those who are normally called Genwunners by those who aren't Gen 1 fans). I am sure that that Anon was broadly calling himself a Genwunner because... wait for it... he is a fan of Generation 1.

For all you know he/she/it coyuld also be a fan of Gen 2 or Gen 3 or Gen 4 or Gen 5 or Gen 6 or even Gen 7, he could even be a fan of Pokemon in general.

Why don't you ask him/her/it and inform yourself before you make a tool yourself (a blunt tool at that).