Oh no the starters aren't that good

>>29738696
People love powercreep for some reason

File: ngbbs50e4e4d91dff1.jpg (35KB, 250x272px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 250x272px

>It's not like previous starters fair that much better
>What is greninja

>>29738696
It's just that ol' console wars mentality getting the best of people with too much free time, yet again, but Pokemon flavored.

>>29738696
People were hoping for another Greninja. Problem is that GF tried so hard to avoid making another one that they made the starters even worse than usual.

Well to be fair this time around all three are really well designed imo and they all have interesting typings even if GF fucked up big time on the stats.

I don't give two shits for starters outside of 0-2 every gen and all 3 of gen 2s but these guys are still p cool

I still won't use any of them in game but on repeat playthroughs I prolly will

>>29738696
yea, its like you have to catch other and better pokemon to beat the game
I dont know what people expected

OP is right though

>competitively viable starters (when their gen came out)
Greninja
Infernape
Empoleon
Blaziken
Swampert

that's it, 5/18 Pokemon

>>29740318
Sceptile wasn't good in Gen 3 despite Leaf Blade and ThunderPunch being special? I call bullshit